On Wed, 19.02.14 18:31, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote: > > > >i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be > >fedora-config-<foo> it could put other config snippets, or pull in > >packages for the experience of the product.
May I suggest calling this "fedora-preset-<foo>" instead? "config" such an over-used term... Not only would "preset" be the appropriate term in the systemd context but I think for other bits you might want to ship in it, too... After all it just contains preset configuation bits in the sense of new "defaults", but not actual user configuration... i.e. it's the preset state before the user started to configure the hell out of it, if you understand what I mean... (But then again, I don't care too much, just my 2c on the name) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
