On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:39:03 -0600
Jon wrote:
> Another aspect I worry about is the mirroring stuff.
> With the coming WGs I fear the rsync mirroring will grow very large,
> and spins are an attractive piece of fat to cut.
> Reducing size is something we worry about on the infra, rel-eng side
> o
On 29/01/14 05:17 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
Spin maintainer as well sharing Dan's view about spin used to display Fedora
uses of FOSS applications without needing to download either DVD or
netinstall. Remixes like Korora for example are comp
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 17:11 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, inode0 wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Josh Boyer
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar
> >>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 5:11:31 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Is it OK to file bugs at bugzilla for nightlies, or should we only file
> bugs for the versions pushed to Fedora?
Yes, it is, sure.
Best regards
--
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
--
devel maili
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 18:17 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> 1) Disk space. Disks are not cheap in the world of data-access ready
> disks. The 4 TB SATAs sound nice but when you try serving FTP off them
> you find that you have to raid more than you did of the expensive SAS
> disks and your
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 16:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > > I'd rather not confuse what is made from Fedora bits with what is
> > > based on Fedora bits but includes other bits. The remix branding does
> > > not seem appropriate for spins
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 16:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > I'd rather not confuse what is made from Fedora bits with what is
> > based on Fedora bits but includes other bits. The remix branding does
> > not seem appropriate for spins that are made purely from Fedora bits.
>
> That's fair. From a r
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 12:11 -0500, Radek Holy wrote:
> I have just added the metadata creation. Good point, thank you.
Is it OK to file bugs at bugzilla for nightlies, or should we only file
bugs for the versions pushed to Fedora?
This repo file works for me:
[dnf-nightlies]
name=DNF nightlies f
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 12:47 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I'm just throwing "jigdo" into the mix[1].
And pyjigdo:
https://fedorahosted.org/pyjigdo/
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wi
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 12:47 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> 2. Upstream seems dead[2]
Not really dead moved from .net to .org
http://atterer.org/jigdo/
We've got
jigdo-gui.x86_64 : Jigdo graphical interface
pyjigdo.noarch : Python version of Jigdo, slightly modified
jigdo.x86_64 : Ease distributio
Hi,
I'm just throwing "jigdo" into the mix[1].
From the infrastructure side, jigdo only needs templates to be hosted.
It picks rpms from the mirrors just like $package_manager. Would it be
feasible to host jigdo files for spins instead of ISO files? The users
would be downloading the same amount
commit b25c7db824d00c05f96598912dd69272d42e4a4d
Author: Ruediger Landmann
Date: Thu Jan 30 11:21:41 2014 +1000
build for EPEL
perl-Locale-Msgfmt.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Locale-Msgfmt.spec b/perl-Locale-Msgfmt.spec
index 6a4
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Spin maintainer as well sharing Dan's view about spin used to display Fedora
> uses of FOSS applications without needing to download either DVD or
> netinstall. Remixes like Korora for example are completely different because
> of the use
On 29 January 2014 16:48, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> > On 29 January 2014 15:49, inode0 wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jon wrote:
> >> > Putting on my rel-eng hat I can say that any spin that fails to
> >> > compose will be dr
Spin maintainer as well sharing Dan's view about spin used to display
Fedora uses of FOSS applications without needing to download either DVD
or netinstall. Remixes like Korora for example are completely different
because of the use of software outside Fedora repository.
I think Workstation Gr
Hello,
- Original Message -
> From: "inode0"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 8:01:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
>
..
>
> I guess I'd like those active in the spin community to make
> suggestion
On 30 January 2014 00:01, Ian Malone wrote:
> Two thoughts:
> 1. Is there scope for a spin to be a particular sub-focus of a product?
> Desktop (all)
> . desktop gnome
> . desktop kde
> . desktop twm (maybe not)
> Server (all)
> . server web
> . server fileserver (or whatever might make sense)
>
On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
> they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
> or small it might be. I also think they can be done by the people
> wishing to provide them without relying
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:48 PM, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>> On 29 January 2014 15:49, inode0 wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jon wrote:
>>> > Putting on my rel-eng hat I can say that any spin that fails to
>>> > compose will be
On 29 January 2014 22:44, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 29 January 2014 15:01, inode0 wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar
>> >>> Something like => propo
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:48 PM, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>> On 29 January 2014 15:49, inode0 wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jon wrote:
>>> > Putting on my rel-eng hat I can say that any spin that fails to
>>> > compose will be
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 29 January 2014 15:49, inode0 wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jon wrote:
>> > Putting on my rel-eng hat I can say that any spin that fails to
>> > compose will be dropped.
>> >
>> > I believe we also encourage or even r
On 29 January 2014 15:49, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Apologies for the slightly alarmist $SUBJECT, but I want to make sure
> >> that
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Jon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Apologies for the slightly alarmist $SUBJECT, but I want to make sure
>> that this gets read by the appropriate groups.
>
> [snip]
>
On 29 January 2014 15:01, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Josh Boyer
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar
> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal proces
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Apologies for the slightly alarmist $SUBJECT, but I want to make sure
> that this gets read by the appropriate groups.
[snip]
>
> 1) Are Spins useful as they currently exist? There ar
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, inode0 wrote:
>> So I am being pulled in both directions on this. One of the goals of
>> agility is to facilitate more things being made from Fedora (at least
>> that was a discussed goal at various times). I ag
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 16:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal process to
> >> accept new products.
> >> Something li
On 01/29/2014 10:01 PM, inode0 wrote:
So I am being pulled in both directions on this. One of the goals of
agility is to facilitate more things being made from Fedora (at least
that was a discussed goal at various times). I agree with that and
pushing aside the best things we have built from Fed
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:01 PM, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal proc
On 01/29/2014 09:33 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
Hi,
I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal process to
accept new products.
Something like => proposal => crop (aka product-to-be
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:03:08 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Well, one of the things we need to decide is whether we address Spins
> at all during the F21 timeframe. I suspect that QA will ask for a
> reprieve on that score.
>
By "Spins" do you mean
1: http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora#de
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal process to
>>> accept new products.
>>> Something like => propos
On 01/29/2014 01:36 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Also:
>>
>> libcacard.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
>> /usr/lib64/libcacard.so.0.0.0
>> libcacard.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
>> /usr/lib64/libcacard.so.0.0.0
>>
>>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal process to
>> accept new products.
>> Something like => proposal => crop (aka product-to-be) => validation =>
>> product
>
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
648
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
138
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11560/fail2ban-0.8.10-4.el5
102
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
648
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
77
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-12079/bip-0.8.9-1.el6
41
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA
Hi,
I agree that we can't support more than a limited number of products.
The point is to make a validation process sufficiently strict so we can
guarantee that the would-be product would be sustainable.
After all, if there are people willing to maintain it on the long term
*and* our infrastructur
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal process to
> accept new products.
> Something like => proposal => crop (aka product-to-be) => validation =>
> product
> When we'll have that, drop the whole spin thing, any sp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2014 03:57 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal
> process to accept new products. Something like => proposal => crop
> (aka product-to-be) => validation => product When we'll have that,
Hi,
I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal process to
accept new products.
Something like => proposal => crop (aka product-to-be) => validation =>
product
When we'll have that, drop the whole spin thing, any spin that isn't fit to
be a product should be reclassified as remi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at -MM-DD 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-01-30 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2014-01-30 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2014-01-30 1
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Also:
>
> libcacard.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
> /usr/lib64/libcacard.so.0.0.0
> libcacard.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
> /usr/lib64/libcacard.so.0.0.0
>
> needs some scripts.
Already fixed in December, I supp
The lightweight tag 'perl-Error-0.17022-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
db46218... Update to 0.17022
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apologies for the slightly alarmist $SUBJECT, but I want to make sure
that this gets read by the appropriate groups.
During today's FESCo meeting, there was the start of a discussion on
how to approve new Products into the Fedora family. As part of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-01-29)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:59:12 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-29/fesco.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2014 07:32 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:21:22AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> I've switched to rawhide yesterday, and discovered that vinagre now
>> forces rsyslog onto my system. That's not great.
>
On 01/29/2014 07:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Eric H. Christensen
mailto:spa...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to catalog what packages are using what
cryptographic ciphers within Fedora (specifically RC4). Does anyone
know o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2014 12:06 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Our mission and branding, including our foundations, tend to
>> steer away from the dull and towards new shiny. In fact, whenever
>> we do something that could be characterized as
Summary of changes:
a01074e... Initial import (#1058968). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 09:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 06:42:52PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Using the wiki as a TCMS is of course a gross hack, but it comes with a
> > surprising number of advantages - see
>
> Makes sense to me. I'm actually not opposed to using
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Eric H. Christensen <
spa...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how to catalog what packages are using what
> cryptographic ciphers within Fedora (specifically RC4). Does anyone know
> of a good way of figuring that out?
>
AFAIK there isn't one.
Eric H. Christensen (spa...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> I'm trying to figure out how to catalog what packages are using what
> cryptographic ciphers within Fedora (specifically RC4). Does anyone know
> of a good way of figuring that out?
I'm imagining some dystopia where every imported and rebase
I have just added the metadata creation. Good point, thank you.
--
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
- Original Message -
From: "Mikolaj Izdebski"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 5:18:41 PM
Subject: Re: Nig
Matthew Miller wrote:
>Our mission and branding, including our foundations, tend to
>steer away from the dull and towards new shiny. In fact, whenever we
>do something that could be characterized as head-down plodding forward
>progress instead of a bold leap, we hear *quite a bit* of sarcasm
>about
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:32:29 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > I've posted a comparison between Sphinx and Dexy [1] - as well as
> > updated the phabricator ticket [2]. The tools are pretty similar in
> > what they can produce, so it really comes down to what people are
> > comfortable with. The
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 08:57 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 06:15:49PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Just to wax philosophical for a minute: I think there's a lot of value
> > in building boring stuff that works well, and I might be weird, but I
>
> [snip eloquent defens
On 01/29/2014 05:03 PM, Radek Holy wrote:
> I am glad to announce the launch of continuous integration job for DNF. Each
> change now starts the bunch of DNF tests on top of upstream versions of
> hawkey, librepo and libcomps.
>
> It also means that from now nightly builds of DNF and its depende
In the previous review, the policies (to be applied during replication
of the schema) were hardcoded.
This new review, is to define them into specific entries under
'cn=replSchema,cn=config" so that it will be configurable.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47676/0002-Ticket-ticket
On 01/28/2014 06:01 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Are there plans to add ARM?
It is my wish as well. My plan is to talk on upcoming DevConf.cz to several
people if/how it can be done.
Additionally I'm in contact with Dan Horak from Secondary Arch team and we may
get PPC builders. But the horizon
On 29 January 2014 16:03, Radek Holy wrote:
> I am glad to announce the launch of continuous integration job for DNF. Each
> change now starts the bunch of DNF tests on top of upstream versions of
> hawkey, librepo and libcomps.
Great news, thanks for doing this. Is there any more documentation
Planned Outage: Fedocal outage for update - 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2014-01-30 10:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hours, possibly less.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date
Dear all,
I am glad to announce the launch of continuous integration job for DNF. Each
change now starts the bunch of DNF tests on top of upstream versions of hawkey,
librepo and libcomps.
It also means that from now nightly builds of DNF and its dependencies are
available to you. Download the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm trying to figure out how to catalog what packages are using what
cryptographic ciphers within Fedora (specifically RC4). Does anyone know of a
good way of figuring that out?
- -- Eric
- --
Eric
commit edf5a566cabf6c9623e1458537b131dbe120ab92
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Jan 29 15:32:25 2014 +
Add upstream fix for t/48_utf8.t to work with Text::CSV_XS ≥ 0.99
.gitignore |8 +-
DBD-CSV-0.38-utf8-test.patch | 53 +
On 11/19/2013 10:55 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 10:32 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:28:47PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>>> Or maybe we could start using %autosetup ?
>>>
>>> http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Autosetup
>>
>> '%autosetup -
commit 4c8ccb01e24d0b2a368c017dfe412862eeb849fd
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Jan 29 15:24:13 2014 +0100
Adapt to changes in Postgres 9.3
...for-the-PrintWarn-test-as-Postgres-got-le.patch | 27
perl-DBD-Pg.spec |9 ++-
2 fil
commit a98a54e5ef6f9888e6ea7b2f52b1d757975a4da5
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Jan 29 15:26:10 2014 +0100
Correct changelog
perl-DBD-Pg.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBD-Pg.spec b/perl-DBD-Pg.spec
index 9e71885..c8c0cd0 100644
--- a
Summary of changes:
afc01c8... Adapt to changes in Postgres 9.3 (*)
c83f650... Correct changelog (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.f
commit afc01c8261a61e612d82ca911dedd0fa3ca9e898
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Jan 29 15:24:13 2014 +0100
Adapt to changes in Postgres 9.3
...for-the-PrintWarn-test-as-Postgres-got-le.patch | 27
perl-DBD-Pg.spec |9 ++-
2 fil
commit c83f650e5c7251cafe3734fa68bd562b214660db
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Jan 29 15:26:10 2014 +0100
Correct changelog
perl-DBD-Pg.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBD-Pg.spec b/perl-DBD-Pg.spec
index e3431da..649fc81 100644
--- a
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:12:09AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
I'll be traveling and miss this meeting, by the way.
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora
Hey,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:21:22AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I've switched to rawhide yesterday, and discovered that vinagre now
> forces rsyslog onto my system. That's not great.
>
> The dependency chain goes something like this:
>
> vinagre -> spice -> libcacard -> ... glusterfs ...
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 06:42:52PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Using the wiki as a TCMS is of course a gross hack, but it comes with a
> surprising number of advantages - see
Makes sense to me. I'm actually not opposed to using the wiki in this way,
but I think it highlights the need for _some
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:21:22AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I've switched to rawhide yesterday, and discovered that vinagre now
> forces rsyslog onto my system. That's not great.
>
> The dependency chain goes something like this:
>
> vinagre -> spice -> libcacard -> ... glusterfs ... ->
>
I've switched to rawhide yesterday, and discovered that vinagre now
forces rsyslog onto my system. That's not great.
The dependency chain goes something like this:
vinagre -> spice -> libcacard -> ... glusterfs ... ->
rsyslog-mmjsonparse -> rsyslog
I think there's at least two questionable links
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058723
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
All Fedoras are affected.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gLYiYFuvgX&a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora
On 01/29/2014 02:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 06:15:49PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Just to wax philosophical for a minute: I think there's a lot of value
in building boring stuff that works well, and I might be weird, but I
[snip eloquent defense of the virtues of b
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 06:15:49PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Just to wax philosophical for a minute: I think there's a lot of value
> in building boring stuff that works well, and I might be weird, but I
[snip eloquent defense of the virtues of boring basic distro work]
> This doesn't mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '20
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> (gkrellm and ksensors should probably have that Requires too!)
Don't know about ksensors, but gkrellm works perfectly fine without
hddtemp so a hard dependency should not be added. Besides the
dependency wouldn't even be enough for monitoring
81 matches
Mail list logo
