On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com>wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 16:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > I'd rather not confuse what is made from Fedora bits with what is > > > based on Fedora bits but includes other bits. The remix branding does > > > not seem appropriate for spins that are made purely from Fedora bits. > > > > That's fair. From a resource and quality perspective though, I'd > > rather not burden rel-eng and QA with having to maintain, create, and > > test spins. > > The 'burden' they create on QA is precisely zero, as we explicitly do > not block releases on spins other than desktop and KDE. I don't believe > releng considers the spins much of a burden, either - it's more just > that they don't like building and pushing out stuff that no-one's even > done a sanity check on. However, we have several high quality spins that > people *do* care about and *do* test: at least the desktop spins, but I > know for e.g. finalzone puts a lot of work into the design spin. > > I think it's fairly presumptuous to suggest chucking all that stuff in > favour of something that doesn't even *exist* yet. > > > F20 improved spins overall, but that was because of a concerted effort > > with our existing resources. If Fedora.next is going to succeed, > > those resources are already going to be overwhelmed with the 3 > > products. > > Again, there is no 'burden' on QA due to spins. > As a user of Fedora I like to say that Fedora spins give so much value to Fedora. I know a lot of people who use spins rather than the default Gnome-desktop-Live. Please don't gutter the spins !
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
