Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

On 08/17/2013 01:47 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Will the bluez-compat be killed in this move? Yes, already gone in the rawhide package: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/commit/?id=e321c716dddf55724776b8686de01cd7f45cbc4a https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754523 --

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On 08/16/2013 03:01 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: your better off using koji to query the builds tagged as it gives you the source package named. $ koji list-tagged --latest f20 | grep fc1[4-8] torque-3.0.4-1.fc17 f20 stevetraylen I've given torque a litt

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 19:17 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > I just fixed these and gallery3, no need to file BZs, unless you'd like to > > for tracking. Additional testers welcome! > > Nah, I'll rerun the query in the script that files BZ

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > I just fixed these and gallery3, no need to file BZs, unless you'd like to > for tracking. Additional testers welcome! Nah, I'll rerun the query in the script that files BZs later on. Although if one of you ends up crippling your package by d

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

We've go the resources. An entire DE doesn't appear out of nowhere. Just trying to determine how to proceed. Dan Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Adam Williamson Sender: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:19:27 To: Developm

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:10 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > >>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

On 08/13/2013 09:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote: Other probs are: 1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself. 2. if gnome revert this change in upstream 'OnlyShowIn=MAT

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-08-14)

On 08/15/2013 03:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 15 August 2013 15:48, Matthew Garrett > wrote: Oh, and to clarify - upgrades were supported even before then, but required booting Anaconda from new install media. That's been true since the Re

Re: doxygen directory reference files

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > doxygen (at least for some packages) is creating files like: > > _builddir_build_BUILD_torque-3.0.4_src_drmaa_src_.3 > > that have contents like: > > .TH "src Directory Reference" 3 "Fri Aug 16 2013" "Version 3.0.4" "torque" > \" -*- nroff

Re: doxygen directory reference files

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> doxygen (at least for some packages) is creating files like: >> >> _builddir_build_BUILD_torque-3.0.4_src_drmaa_src_.3 >> >> that have contents like: >> >> .TH "src Directory Reference"

Re: RFC: Old packages remain on the mirrors for one week

On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 22:46:10 +0100 Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:15:11 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > That sounds like it would be a lot of duplication in mirrormanager > > and other parts of the project. ;) > > > > kevin > > Why not do it's on the users PC\Laptop. (As a cha

doxygen directory reference files

doxygen (at least for some packages) is creating files like: _builddir_build_BUILD_torque-3.0.4_src_drmaa_src_.3 that have contents like: .TH "src Directory Reference" 3 "Fri Aug 16 2013" "Version 3.0.4" "torque" \" -*- nroff -*- .ad l .nh .SH NAME src Directory Reference \- .SH SYNOPSIS .br

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: >> > On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >> >> >>> FTBFS pa

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: >> > libvpd-2.1.1-2.fc15 f20 ausil >> > lsvpd-1.6.8-3.fc15f20 ausil > > ... and note that these two are PPC only,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: > > libvpd-2.1.1-2.fc15 f20 ausil > > lsvpd-1.6.8-3.fc15f20 ausil ... and note that these two are PPC only, IIRC. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> > >>> FTBFS packages need: > >>> > >>> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >>> FTBFS packages need: >>> >>> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things >>> still have earlier d

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On 08/16/2013 10:15 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> FTBFS packages need: >> >> 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things >> still have earlier dist tags > [snip] > Nevertheless, as far as I can see there

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:17:42PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > FTBFS packages need: > > 1) a list gathered by pruning the old F18FTBFS bug, or noting what things > still have earlier dist tags There is no such bug, therefore I checked whether any package from http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f

Re: Orphaned: libgnomecups

Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Underlying dep of libgnomeprint22/libgnomeprintui22, which is used by a few > > end-user things (gpp, conglomerate, gnome-genius), but nothing I need for > > now, so giving up ownership. > >

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-08-14)

Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said: > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 08:42 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > Actually no, the system is all hacked up and works in a super-abusive way, > > see > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979083 > > That bug is really an illustration why it is just w

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said: > On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two > > releases [...] > > From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are > there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well? >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said: > On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two > > releases [...] > > From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are > there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well? (

Re: [fedora-arm] Criteria for adding new ARM boards to F20 support list

On 08/14/2013 04:09 PM, Omalley_s wrote: Just a suggestion, two developers with the actual board in hand for testing and qa purposes. The reason for two I simply sometimes a single developer can't keep up for personaland maybe there should be a "working group". The should be a working but not of

Trousers package changed license to BSD

Hi, The 0.3.11 release of trousers has changed from the CPL license to the 3 clause BSD license. -Steve -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-08-14)

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 08:42 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > Actually no, the system is all hacked up and works in a super-abusive way, > see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979083 That bug is really an illustration why it is just wrong to keep information about the update history in

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-08-14)

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 16:12 -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 08/15/2013 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:36:53 -0400 > > "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > >> Interesting since they did not do that when I joined QA what 5 or 6 > >> years ago so again can you refe

[perl-Email-Address] 1.900

commit 3316746a34d897f57f3f2a24e8602edade952113 Author: Tom Callaway Date: Fri Aug 16 12:48:52 2013 -0400 1.900 .gitignore |1 + perl-Email-Address.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.g

File Email-Address-1.900.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by spot

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Email-Address: 40a76806c7cf5cb8ef65bc80328436b8 Email-Address-1.900.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 19:37:29 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: 在 2013-8-16 PM7:25，"Kalev Lember" 写道： From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well? Why? Still many FTBFS on my hand, most are related to docdir change.

[Bug 992675] perl-Math-NumSeq: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992675 --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok --- It builds without it, but slic3r does not, so I'm leaving this open. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token

Re: Bundled Flash

There are several options for uploading multiple files from browsers - and the latest versions of all modern browsers support multiple file selection. A random example is this one: https://github.com/blueimp/jQuery-File-Upload With information about browser support here: https://github.com/blueim

EPEL Version requirements

Are there any requirements that the version of a package in say EPEL 5 needs to be less than the version in RHEL6? Since upgrades are not supported between EL versions, I was wondering if this was a requirement or not. Is this noted anywhere? I can't find a particular mention, although I susp

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:09:09AM +0200, Johan De Taeye wrote: > T.C., > > >>Please remove this prohibited content from your packages, or ensure that > >>any included .swf files are built from source using a free software > >>toolchain like `swfc` during the %build phase. > > The single SWF file

[perl-ExtUtils-Depends/f19] (3 commits) ...Update to 0.304

Summary of changes: f841e56... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) e448533... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) 1301f0f... Update to 0.304 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Bundled Flash

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:45 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth < tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) > files, > but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash > toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping

Re: Review Request 36: improve update syncs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/36/#review69 --- Ship it! Looks good to me - it's now working in my dev env wit

Re: Suggestion: bmap files and bmaptool

On 8/16/13 3:46 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> Another approach which might (?) be more robust, is to somehow encode >> > that sparseness in a single file format that can be >> > transported/compressed/copied w/o losing the sparseness information, >> > and another tool to operate efficiently on tha

(+libebackend, libedataserver) Re: evolution-data-server soname version bump for libedata-book/libedata-cal next week (3.9.90 release)

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 08:03 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > there will be a soname version bump in evolution-data-server update > 3.9.90 the next week, namely for libedata-book and libedata-cal > libraries. Affected might be evolution-mapi and evolution-ews, which are > updated together with it anyway.

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-08-14)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:43:27PM -0400, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 08/15/2013 03:16 PM, drago01 wrote: > >Suddenly? They always have been "supported" that even dates back to > >the Redhat Linux days ... > > > > I should clarify what I'm talking about is the discussion of > "officially"

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:42:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I don't know how many plugins that affects, but at least not core > WordPress. The bad news is that, as that text mentions, Plupload is > Wordpress's "library of choice", and it's the other thing with a .swf > file. I don't have Fla

Re: Introduction

Hello Brian, On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:59:10 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 15.8.2013 23:39, Brian Schonecker napsal(a): > > Per request at > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join > > I would like to introduce myself. > > > > Who am I?

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:04 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this > >> point in time. > > > > Reforking? And then wa

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

在 2013-8-16 PM7:25，"Kalev Lember" 写道： > From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are > there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well? Why? Still many FTBFS on my hand, most are related to docdir change. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20 v2

On 08/10/2013 08:50 PM, Till Maas wrote: > The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two > releases [...] From what I can tell, the list below was only for orphaned packages. Are there plans to retire FTBFS packages as well? -- Thanks, Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedo

Re: Orphaned: libgnomecups

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Jiri Popelka wrote: > On 08/16/2013 01:54 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bill Nottingham >> wrote: >>> >>> Underlying dep of libgnomeprint22/libgnomeprintui22, which is used by a >>> few >>> end-user things (gpp, conglomerate, gno

Re: retiring gpointing-device-settings

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > The package currently fails to build and upstream appears to be dead. > Even the working package does not save settings. > > https://wiki.gnome.org/GPointingDeviceSettings > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gpointing-device-settings/ > > Problem:

Re: Merging accounts on ask.fedoraproject.org

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 10:03 +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Hello, Hi Lukas, > > when the site was launched, I used my generic OpenID account, but now > I > would like to merge also my Fedora OpenID to it. > > I tried to login using FAS and it just created a new one. Searching > around did not re

Re: Introduction

Dne 15.8.2013 23:39, Brian Schonecker napsal(a): Per request at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join I would like to introduce myself. Who am I? Brian Schonecker, RHCE and complete novice at building packages? What will I contrib

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 15:41 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > WordPress? > > Not easy. Two of the ones in wordpress are both in upload libraries - plupload and swfupload. Both are present in the source tarball, it doesn't look like they're built during source compile. It looks like we could lift

Re: Suggestion: bmap files and bmaptool

Hi Eric, thanks for the question. Sorry my answers contain extra information, but I assume that other people read this, and may benefit from the info. After all, I am trying to get people interested, this is a good tool IMO, and I would like to get more users and hopefully contributors. :-) On Th

Re: Orphaned: libgnomecups

On 08/16/2013 01:54 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Underlying dep of libgnomeprint22/libgnomeprintui22, which is used by a few end-user things (gpp, conglomerate, gnome-genius), but nothing I need for now, so giving up ownership. Isn't it jus

Re: orphaning of packages

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > Jima has not been able to make enough time for Fedora lately and asked > me to orphan and announce the packages he maintains. > > alsa-oss > aoetools > banner > banner taken.

Merging accounts on ask.fedoraproject.org

Hello, when the site was launched, I used my generic OpenID account, but now I would like to merge also my Fedora OpenID to it. I tried to login using FAS and it just created a new one. Searching around did not reveal any merging possibilities (maybe I am just blind - help me here please). Thank

Re: Bundled Flash

WordPress? Not easy. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

rubygem-i18n_data license change

Hi, rubygem-i18n_data 0.4.0 license changed from 'Public Domain' to 'MIT'. Thanks Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-08-14)

On 08/16/2013 09:42 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: On 15. 8. 2013 at 09:37:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:32:27 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: what does *not* matter in case of "yum distro-sync" because it does also downgrades and if fedup has a problem with it the people who say yum is not