Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said: > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 08:42 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: > > Actually no, the system is all hacked up and works in a super-abusive way, > > see > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979083 > > That bug is really an illustration why it is just wrong to keep > information about the update history in a semi-private 'db' that only > yum gets to access. > > This information belongs into the journal. We have the change to fix > that in the dnf transition.
As long as the journal is rotated out at arbitrary times due to space reasons, I really really don't think the information belongs there. It should still be in a public db for other things to use, though. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
