On 16/02/13 01:55, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 février 2013 à 23:04 +, Jamie Nguyen a écrit :
>> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of python-sleekxmpp to request to
>> co-maintain (as it's a bit out of date). Emails to his/her FAS email
>> address are bouncing but there are no ot
Hi
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I think settings should be made available to the user, but not in a
> half-assed "tweak tool". That's what the settings dialog is for.
>
We understand that is your view point and it is fine to hold that view
point and as a KDE maintain
Hi
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and which fool has written the feature page without knowing what binary
> compatibility
>
You have been repeatedly using offensive language and shouting on the
mailing lists on a regular basis. Can you stop doing that? It is getting
On 02/15/2013 09:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Several people on #fedora-kde see this UI as a way to push the agenda
of making users not even realize there's an alternative to GNOME
Those "several people" have poor attitude when they assume malice. It is
a poisonous thing to do
Rahul
--
devel
On Qui, 2013-02-14 at 09:37 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 02/13/2013 07:40 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> what you mean by redundant ? if I not reboot system, do I need
> >> --reload-rules on F16+ ? (when install the package )
> >> and whe
On 02/16/2013 01:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 15/02/13 02:15 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 09:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 12:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
There is no change, the unit file is still mysqld.se
drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:16:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>>> What I want is that "yum distro-sync" removes the package eventually.
>>
>> Then it will need an "Obsoletes" tag somewhere else to get rid of any
>>
On 02/15/2013 06:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, yes, that's true. How does that count as 'well hidden'? It's not
like you can login without entering your password.
I call it "well hidden" because real users have come complaining to
#fedora-kde claiming GDM "does not su
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 09/02/13 01:03 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Last I checked, GDM also hid that feature so well that many users missed
>> it. In fact, unless this changed recently, when you input your user name,
>> the option is NOT shown, it only appears after you confirm your user
>> nam
Martin Sourada wrote:
> I don't think that's what he is trying to tell. I believe it's: either
> expose the setting, or don't have the setting. The middle way is
> broken, be it semi-official tweak tool or even worse "advanced" tab.
> Especially if the tweak tool is for settings that are expected t
Le vendredi 15 février 2013 à 23:04 +, Jamie Nguyen a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of python-sleekxmpp to request to
> co-maintain (as it's a bit out of date). Emails to his/her FAS email
> address are bouncing but there are no other maintainers to contact.
>
> No
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dan Mashal wrote:
>> I will look at switching MATE Desktop to KDM or MDM if necessary
>> (which I kind of wanted to do from the start, not the hugest fan of
>> LightDM as a user personally).
>
> As much as I like KDM, I don't think it'd be the
Le samedi 16 février 2013 à 00:15 +0100, Martin Sourada a écrit :
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:13:08 -0800
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On 09/02/13 01:03 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Last I checked, GDM also hid that feature so well that many users
> > > missed it. In fact, unless this changed rec
Am 16.02.2013 01:29, schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:05:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> * even MySQL 5.5 had a HIDDEN soname break on a minor update with the
>> need of rebuild depending packages and now people will explain me
>> that two different forks are bi
Am 15.02.2013 23:15, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On 02/15/2013 09:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
>> On 02/15/2013 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>> On 02/15/2013 12:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
There is no change, the unit file is still mysqld.service.
>>> Hmm..
>>>
>>> It's probably
On 15/02/13 02:15 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 09:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 12:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
There is no change, the unit file is still mysqld.service.
Hmm..
It's probably better to have an m
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:05:48PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> * even MySQL 5.5 had a HIDDEN soname break on a minor update with the
> need of rebuild depending packages and now people will explain me
> that two different forks are binary compatible - this is very
> thin ice and can
Am 15.02.2013 22:32, schrieb Honza Horak:
> On 02/15/2013 3:31 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 02/15/2013 01:50 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
>>> I still see the differences between MariaDB and MySQL to be very
>>> little.
>>
>> Difference never the less and difference in behavior ( which maria
On 02/15/2013 09:32 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 3:31 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 01:50 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
I still see the differences between MariaDB and MySQL to be very
little.
Difference never the less and difference in behavior ( which mariadbs
own benchma
On 02/15/2013 09:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 12:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
There is no change, the unit file is still mysqld.service.
Hmm..
It's probably better to have an mariadb own unit files and create
corresponding mysql s
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:55:51AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 02:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >It's all going to depend on what we want the upgrade experience to be like
> >for people going from f18 to f19. I believe that FESCo punted it down the
> >road since there w
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:22:33PM -0500, Honza Horak wrote:
>
> Upstream chose the way of drop-in replacement, which means that the same
> API including file names was actually a feature. Why we don't do it
> differently in Fedora is obvious -- we don't want to differ from upstream.
>
Actually..
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > It's all going to depend on what we want the upgrade experience to be like
> > for people going from f18 to f19. I believe that FESCo punted it down the
> > road since the
On 15 February 2013 12:24, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 15/02/13 05:44 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 15/02/13 03:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
>>>
I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
wrong, but isn't it fairly
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:13:08 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 09/02/13 01:03 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Last I checked, GDM also hid that feature so well that many users
> > missed it. In fact, unless this changed recently, when you input
> > your user name, the option is NOT shown, it only app
On 02/08/2013 08:46 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The mediawiki package is severely outdated. I have attempted to contact
the maintainer and received only one reply in a couple of weeks. He has
ignored my requests for co-maintainership.
I commented on the NRM bug[1] two weeks ago with no respon
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:31:42 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Kevin, you work on a desktop which sufficiently represents your
> views. I think we're all aware that if we want fifteen thousand
> settings in the control panel, we can run KDE. Do you really believe
> you're going to convince the GNOME
Hello,
I'm trying to contact the maintainer of python-sleekxmpp to request to
co-maintain (as it's a bit out of date). Emails to his/her FAS email
address are bouncing but there are no other maintainers to contact.
Not really sure how exactly to get in touch given that email is the only
form of c
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:50:28AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> - make a script to identify all the packages that are broken and
> shipping debug stuff.
AT least for the directory a simple yum call should suffice:
yum --disablerepo '*' --enablerepo fedora\* whatprovides /usr/lib/debug
But it
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:24:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 15/02/13 05:44 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >You're both kind of right - the README.RPM file that comes in the
> >mediawiki package tells you to run "mw-createinstance " to create
> >an instance and that sets up a document root in th
Am 15.02.2013 14:10, schrieb Jan-Frode Myklebust:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:17:00AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other
>> distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL", "MySQL-server",
>> etc, which simply conflicted with
On 02/15/2013 09:40 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
Neither Andrew or I will do the packaging. I'll be involved, but
someone from our build team will do the actual packaging. None of us
are Fedora packagers, so I guess we'll need someone to review our
packaging and sponsor us.
Or current maint
On 02/15/2013 05:40 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:07:22 +0100, Rahul Sundaram
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
MariaDB WILL replace MySQL on upgrades.
Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to g
On 02/15/2013 01:50 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 12:39 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 11:07 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
If mysql on the other hand is banned in the distribution then arguably
it makes sense to migrate those instances to the latest release of
mariadb inst
Am 15.02.2013 04:13, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
>> maintainers in Fedora as well. They did offer to do that but don't seem
>> to have stepped up yet.
>
> I really don't see what we have to gain from having
On 02/15/2013 09:09 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
So again, if you have some concrete concerns, let us know, please.
What are the plans to handle the name change in the daemon startup (
systemd unit ) in the migration faze to prevent users having to find out
on their own how to start mariadb along
On 02/15/2013 02:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:17:00AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
"Norvald H. Ryeng" writes:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:07:22 +0100, Rahul Sundaram
Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
maintainers in Fedora as well. They did
On 02/15/2013 11:07 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 11:27 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Mariadb is evolving into it's own product with it's own feature set [1]
thus should be treated as different product it should have it's own .cnf
file it's own configuration directory which is best i
On 02/15/2013 09:09 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/13/2013 02:16 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
I for one would not want to find out that my mysql install would have
been replaced with mariadb on upgrade ( or visa versa )
The discussion already started several weeks ago but we still need any
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:22 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> (subject changed, please strip the [was...] when replying)
>
>> On 13/02/13 10:15 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> > (well, more like crap, since I still haven't figured out how to
>> > get pulseaudio to use my digital audio outputs).
>>
>> Really? It
On 15/02/13 10:22 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
(subject changed, please strip the [was...] when replying)
On 13/02/13 10:15 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
(well, more like crap, since I still haven't figured out how to
get pulseaudio to use my digital audio outputs).
Really? It's not that hard. It's either
On 15/02/13 09:49 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
Interestingly, 'repoquery -l' does show some of the mediawiki packages
owning files in /var/www/. Whether grandfathered, broken, or just
misconception, I'll keep further comment to myself until I can play with
a VM.
There are cases when there really ha
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:10 PM "Jan-Frode Myklebust" wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:17:00AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some
> > other
> > distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL",
> > "MySQL-server",
> > etc, which
Rahul Sundaram writes:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I really don't see what we have to gain from having 2 conflicting versions
>> of MySQL in Fedora.
> We never had the culture of questioning why anyone should include any
> package as long as it meets the current gu
On 02/15/2013 3:31 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 01:50 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > I still see the differences between MariaDB and MySQL to be very
> > little.
>
> Difference never the less and difference in behavior ( which mariadbs
> own benchmarking on their website proof )
On 02/15/2013 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 12:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > There is no change, the unit file is still mysqld.service.
>
> Hmm..
>
> It's probably better to have an mariadb own unit files and create
> corresponding mysql symbolic link to those unit file
On 02/15/2013 02:32 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Please see the following link for further details:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Talks/ARMTechTalks
>
> Today's talk is on debugging vexpress (Versatile Express) kernels
> running under qemu models with gdb. It will simply cover se
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:03:50 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 11:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:36:03 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> >
> >> Running some automated tests I stumble over the debug directories. E. g.,
> >>
> >> $ repoquery -qf /usr/lib/debug
> >>
> >>
> Yeah, a test environment would be good.
Found a first one! EL6 with Openbox from EPEL. That one auto-spawns
g-s-d when running Audacious unpatched.
$ find /usr/share/dbus-1|grep Sett
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.service
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 15/02/13 05:44 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 15/02/13 03:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content
from /usr/share/ to /var/www/
I am working to become a packager for spice-html5 [1].
Eduardo Echeverria has suggested that I break out the dependent
Javascript libraries into separate packages, which I am now working on.
I am attempting to follow the Javascript library packaging guideline
[2], however I have uncovered an issu
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:13:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Could you tell me a test environment where auto-starting the daemon is
> > reproducible? Then I might take a look at trying to avoid it.
>
> It should be auto-started when your app pokes at the not-yet-spawned
> well-known D-Bus name.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:03:50PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Thanks for reply... Still, I'm puzzled about 45 packages owning
> /usr/lib/debug, none of them the filesystem package. This looks
> weird, although I don't grasp the consequences (if any).
>
> A normal review rule says that a package
Hi All,
A heads up that we're planning an outage of arm.koji.fedoraproject.org
to migrate the koji instance to the new infrastructure in Phoenix.
The outage will begin about 02:00 UTC on Saturday the 16th February
and while we're not certain the exact time it should take we estimate
it should be
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> When talking to Ubuntu users, they are telling Unity is as biasing as
> Gnome3.
Aside from the visual arrangement of things, I haven't seen *major*
differences between the GNOME 3 and the Unity user interfaces. It's
not all that hard for m
(subject changed, please strip the [was...] when replying)
> On 13/02/13 10:15 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > (well, more like crap, since I still haven't figured out how to
> > get pulseaudio to use my digital audio outputs).
>
> Really? It's not that hard. It's either a device or a profile right on
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:16:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> What I want is that "yum distro-sync" removes the package eventually.
>
> Then it will need an "Obsoletes" tag somewhere else to get rid of any
> installed CK packages.
W
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:15:40 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:33:46 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> > PS. Yes, I repeat this message. Looks like it wasn't sent somehow :(
>
> As I had replied to the earlier message ;) here just a mention that
> I've reported the mispackaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911713
Bug ID: 911713
Summary: https stopped working on some sites
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-LWP-Protocol-https
Severity: unspecified
Priority: un
On Feb 15, 2013 5:34 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
.
>>
>> I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
>> wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content
>> from /usr/share/ to /var/www/ then localizing. H
commit 5fa4b7ad47cd42baff8352a703cfc259455de72a
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Fri Feb 15 10:16:20 2013 -0700
update to 0.08206
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBIx-Class.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Feb 15, 2013 6:39 AM, "Aaron Gray" wrote:
>
> Pete,
>
> Yeah that's the easy bits, they need details too. The bit I have yet to
find out how to do is to forward HTTPS and DNS ports between the
primary internet network and the secondary DHCP BOOTP network on
192.168.1.x. I had this working on S
Am 14.02.2013 16:17, schrieb Tom Lane:
> "Norvald H. Ryeng" writes:
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:07:22 +0100, Rahul Sundaram
>>> Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
>>> maintainers in Fedora as well. They did offer to do that but don't seem
>>> to have stepped
commit c94116e175ecb1f7d4881105ef57c968214dc0c2
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Fri Feb 15 08:24:13 2013 -0700
update to 0.22
perl-Scope-Upper.spec | 15 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Scope-Upper.spec b/perl-Scope-Upper.spec
index 9ec98
Hi
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I really don't see what we have to gain from having 2 conflicting versions
> of MySQL in Fedora.
>
We never had the culture of questioning why anyone should include any
package as long as it meets the current guidelines. As long as ther
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:01:52 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I plan to retire xmms before F20 is branched as it is causing issues
with the removal of some other obsolete packages and it has no
upstream support.
If anyone has objections to this please speak up soon.
There were objections
On 02/15/2013 04:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
>> maintainers in Fedora as well. They did offer to do that but don't seem
>> to have stepped up yet.
>
> I really don't see what we have to gain from having
On 02/15/2013 12:39 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 11:07 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
Then it should also need separate binaries, libraries, datadir,
socket, ... I'm not saying it is so bad idea, but it could be taken
into account only in the upstream, we really cannot do something l
On 15/02/13 03:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 08/02/13 01:36 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
I haven't poked at mediawiki in a while, so please correct me if I'm
wrong, but isn't it fairly self contained? I recall copying the content
from /usr/share/ to /var/www/ then localizing. Having a new version
sh
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:17:00AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The way this worked in the past (and still does on RHEL and some other
> distros) is that MySQL AB provided RPMs named "MySQL", "MySQL-server",
> etc, which simply conflicted with the Red Hat-supplied packages named
> "mysql", "mysql-se
On 02/15/2013 01:52 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 02/15/2013 01:24 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/15/2013 09:09 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
So again, if you have some concrete concerns, let us know, please.
What are the plans to handle the name change in the daemon startup (
systemd unit )
On 02/14/2013 11:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:36:03 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
Running some automated tests I stumble over the debug directories. E. g.,
$ repoquery -qf /usr/lib/debug
shows 45 owners on current F18. Other directories under /usr/lib/debug
have a simila
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> It's all going to depend on what we want the upgrade experience to be like
> for people going from f18 to f19. I believe that FESCo punted it down the
> road since there wasn't an actual MySQL package maintainer at the time we
> decided to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910685
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911536
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910685
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911536
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.61-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911536
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version
On 02/15/2013 11:27 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Mariadb is evolving into it's own product with it's own feature set [1]
thus should be treated as different product it should have it's own .cnf
file it's own configuration directory which is best in the long run (
from my pov ).
Then it sh
Hi!
Here is an example:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736498
I filled this bug during the F-16 Graphics test week.
After the Fedora EOL reminder and before the bug was closed, I tried to
reproduce it on F-17 and I couldn't. Thus I marked the bug as CLOSED
CURRENTRELEASE.
After a coup
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:16:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> What I want is that "yum distro-sync" removes the package eventually.
Then it will need an "Obsoletes" tag somewhere else to get rid of any
installed CK packages.
"yum distro-sync" doesn't remove orphans. It only upgrades/downgrades
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:33:46 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> PS. Yes, I repeat this message. Looks like it wasn't sent somehow :(
As I had replied to the earlier message ;) here just a mention that
I've reported the mispackaged nacl-devel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/911405
--
Fedora release 19 (Ra
Hi,
On 02/15/2013 07:57 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 02/14/2013 06:35 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 02/14/2013 01:28 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:53 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
DJ Delorie wrote:
Disadvantage,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:35:23 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>
> >>> DJ Delorie wrote:
> Disadvantage, if you ask me. First thing audacious did was spew
> random errors to the screen and change my Firefox and emacs cursors.
> >
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:30:01 +0100, Toshio Kuratomi
wrote:
"Norvald H. Ryeng" writes:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:07:22 +0100, Rahul Sundaram
Well, unless Oracle as upstream wants to get involved as downstream
maintainers in Fedora as well. They did offer to do that but don't
seem
to have
Package perl-Module-Load-Conditional in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Load-Conditional
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-
commit 94faa4dcfdec033dcd850f90a7ede4558de6d257
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Feb 15 10:22:00 2013 +0100
Import
.gitignore|1 +
dead.package |1 -
perl-Module-Load-Conditional.spec | 67 +
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Load-Conditional:
626d90b25bd461388e4706ff7a631d72 Module-Load-Conditional-0.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
commit 959e51b68497db0336c1c2f973f0271830e9d176
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Feb 15 10:18:51 2013 +0100
Import
.gitignore|1 +
dead.package |1 -
perl-IPC-Cmd.spec | 67 +
sources |1 +
4 files change
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IPC-Cmd:
c9379038439420228567dc3f0e34cd24 IPC-Cmd-0.78.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
On 02/14/2013 06:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/14/2013 04:07 AM, Chris wrote:
In other words: It is not possible to install mysql on ferdora 19???
Fedora and freedom??? Freedom is to have the choice between mysql and
mariadb!
Please read the other threads before exploding like this. To summ
Package perl-IPC-Cmd in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-IPC-Cmd
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
On 02/13/2013 02:16 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
I for one would not want to find out that my mysql install would have
been replaced with mariadb on upgrade ( or visa versa )
The discussion already started several weeks ago but we still need any
feedback. What are you particular concerns
On 02/14/2013 01:07 PM, Chris wrote:
2013/2/14 Kevin Kofler:
>Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>>Surely you are not honestly consider replacing mysql installation with
>>mariadb on upgrades?
>
>Have you missed the discussion? MariaDB is a drop-in replacement for MySQL,
>it will REPLACE MySQL in Fe
On 13 Feb 2013 22:50, "Matthew Miller" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:38:42PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > However, I have already removed consolekit on my F18 without any notable
> > issue, so I do not think any breakage would be blocking. We have the
> > whole F19 cycle to find and d
Summary of changes:
cb65684... Initial import (#904331). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
Summary of changes:
fdb3ace... Initial import (#904329). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:28:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:53 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > > > DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > > > Disadvant
On 02/14/2013 06:35 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/14/2013 01:28 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:53 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>>
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Disadvantage, if you ask me. First thing
On 13/02/13 10:15 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
(well, more like crap, since I still haven't figured out how to
get pulseaudio to use my digital audio outputs).
Really? It's not that hard. It's either a device or a profile right on
the very first tab of GNOME sound properties. If you're using
pavuco
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
