On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 02:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bill Nottingham writes:
> > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
> >> (If the compatibility testing goes *really* smoothly, maybe we could
> >> just drop the requirement for original mysql to still be available,
> >> in which case it reduces to the
Bill Nottingham writes:
> Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
>> (If the compatibility testing goes *really* smoothly, maybe we could
>> just drop the requirement for original mysql to still be available,
>> in which case it reduces to the standard package-replacement problem.
>> But I'm not prepare
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
>> Hi everyboy,
>>
>> My name is Juerg Haefliger and I'm a software engineer with
>> Hewlett-Packard based in Switzerland. Part of my responsibilities is
>> building guest images for the
> 3) ghc - using LLVM as compiler, as a result incorrect triplet
Not sure what this is referring to: ghc ARM devel for F18 is
basically done (except for a few minor libs appearing
in the Branch report that need rebuilding) and working fine.
Maybe this is referring to this Rawhide llvm issue
https
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
> to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
> list.
> FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announce
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 19:30:25 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the
final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the
first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the
list archives). So I dec
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I can think of a couple of potential issues with the 'dynamic' tracker
> names (I'm not sure whether nominations will 'transfer' from one release
> to the next when we change where the alias points, and if so, whether we
> want that, espe
Hey folks!
At FUDCon Lawrence, Tim Flink presented on the Fedora blocker bug and
'NTH' processes, and we got some interesting and useful feedback. People
felt that the 'nice to have' / 'accepted' name used in that process was
confusing and difficult to understand, and that the aliases used for the
On 1/22/13 7:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ext4 metadata checksums feature was merged into Linux 3.6. Can I use
> it out of the box with Fedora kernel or is there some magic switch to
> enable it?
>
> Are there any plans to support it in e2fsprogs shipped in Fedora -
> backport or reb
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 19:00 CET) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #896 Refine Feature proc
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
> Yes, that's the general idea --- any dependencies on mysql should result
> in installing mariadb, unless the user takes specific action to get
> mysql instead. Ideally we'd just do the standard Provides/Obsoletes
> dance for replacing one package with another, b
On Mon, 21.01.13 10:25, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > The glibc maintainers don't seem to be against this idea and I am
> > willing to put time into design and implementation.
>
> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you're after, but doesn't "getaddrinfo_a"
> already provide a
Hi,
Ext4 metadata checksums feature was merged into Linux 3.6. Can I use
it out of the box with Fedora kernel or is there some magic switch to
enable it?
Are there any plans to support it in e2fsprogs shipped in Fedora -
backport or rebase to 1.43 version?
Last but equally important - how stable
Good evening all,
Please join us tomorrow in #fedora-arm on Freenode for a VFAD to address our
final
blockers for F18 RC1 for ARM.
Let's start off with a short meeting beginning at 10am (EST) to discuss the
remaining
items - what needs to be done and who will be assisting with each part.
F18
I'm starting to look at packaging up x2go (http://x2go.org) which appears to
be taking up the charge of maintaining the nx libraries as well as developing
new tools around it.
So the proposal would be to replace the current "nx" packages with a "nx-libs"
package using the x2go sources. Some i
On 22 Jan 2013 20:35, "Josh Boyer" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500,
> > Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > >On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
> > >
> > >>>The hundreds series is speific to the fedora ve
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> Would this involve moving around any of the provides for mysql over to
> MariaDB?
Yes, that's the general idea --- any dependencies on mysql should result
in installing mariadb, unless the user takes specific action to get
mysql instead. Ideally we'd just do the standard Pr
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:25:46 -0500
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bill Nottingham writes:
> > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> >> We would like to replace MySQL with MariaDB in early development
> >> cycle for Fedora 19. MySQL will continue to be available for at
> >> least one release, but Mari
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500,
> Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> >On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
> >
> >>>The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
> >>>f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purp
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:22:00PM +0100, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
> > See
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/175876.html
> > for details. Once gcc-4.8.0-* is built into Fedora, after a few days or
> > we
Bill Nottingham writes:
> Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
>> We would like to replace MySQL with MariaDB in early development cycle for
>> Fedora 19. MySQL will continue to be available for at least one release, but
>> MariaDB will become the default. Also, we do not intend to support
Jaroslav Reznik schreef op wo 16-01-2013 om 12:35 [-0500]:
> See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/175876.html
> for details. Once gcc-4.8.0-* is built into Fedora, after a few days or weeks
> a mass rebuild should be performed.
I see that gcc 4.8 was just imported in
Hello Fedora faithful,
My name is Ben Harper and work for Rackspace as a RPM developer in
Austin, TX. My duties include creating RPMs for internal use, but also
for iuscommunity.org (IUS). IUS provides new versions of packages found
in RHEL. I am looking to become a package maintainer for E
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive:
d80a27859c13d471019c75494409282e Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001008.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:44:11AM -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> > 7xx, 8xx, 9xx, 0xx,
> > The first number of a Fedora release seems mostly superfluous.
> 9xx->0xx breaks the goal "that updates will work better".
Also would be unnecessarily confusing. It's not like we're running out of
numbers here.
Le Sam 19 janvier 2013 13:34, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
> 2013/1/19 Nicolas Mailhot :
> Do you have any hints on working on option 3? Well, that means not
> using fontconfig, so might not be worth for a generic Linux solution...
What renderer is matplotlib using now ? Because II
On 01/22/2013 11:28 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 7xx, 8xx, 9xx, 0xx,
>
> The first number of a Fedora release seems mostly superfluous.
9xx->0xx breaks the goal "that updates will work better".
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
Le Dim 20 janvier 2013 06:46, David Tardon a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a):
>> >On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> >>On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik
On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
>
>>> The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
>>> f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purpose is to keep f18 versions
>>> ahead of f17 versions so that updates will work be
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500,
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purpose is to keep f18 versions
ahead of f17 versions so that updates will work better
On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote
The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently
f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purpose is to keep f18 versions
ahead of f17 versions so that updates will work better.
..
Presumably as new kernels come out the base number will change
2013/1/22 Przemek Klosowski
> On 01/20/2013 11:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Ray Strodewrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I find it easier (and smaller) to download the netinst.iso (like
>> > Fedora-18-x86_64-netinst.iso)
>> > Loop-back moun
Alexander Bokovoy píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 19:59 +0200:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'm going to push update cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 into Rawhide soon. Part of this
> >update
> >is also SONAME bump to libsasl2.so.3.
> Are there any reasons for soname bump? Could you p
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI?
I very much doubt it
> Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity.
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: Peter Robinson
>>> To
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to push update cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 into Rawhide soon. Part of this
update
is also SONAME bump to libsasl2.so.3.
Are there any reasons for soname bump? Could you please point out for
those?
Are there are changes to existing API/structu
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
> to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
> list.
> FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
>
> = Features
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:35:08 -0500 (EST)
Anthony Green escribió:
> Dennis wrote:
> > I am right now building a compat-libffi package that has just the
> > old .so nothing to be built against. so expect that early this week
> > the .so of libffi will b
Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI?
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity.
Peter Robinson wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: Peter Robinson
>> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>> Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
On 01/20/2013 11:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Ray Strodewrote:
Hi,
> I find it easier (and smaller) to download the netinst.iso (like
> Fedora-18-x86_64-netinst.iso)
> Loop-back mount and pull the vmlinuz and initrd.img into /boot
The
commit 3060956d5f15186b1b2a84bb4270659254997980
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Jan 22 16:47:00 2013 +
Update to 0.42
- New upstream release 0.42
- No longer silently remove directories that are in the way before untar()
- Better error diagnosis on failing untar() te
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sysadm-Install:
9f9d3a7b174b8be45a326b833dd8401e Sysadm-Install-0.42.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Please take discussions like these to the installer development list;
fedora-devel is too broad a list to discuss mintuae like this I think.
On 01/20/2013 05:15 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> we see 3 items, one of them "no disk selected"
> it has the same level of importance as the rest two,
> I bel
On 01/21/2013 07:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> * DO NOT REWRITE code! It will ALWAYS break things!
You're joking, right? If nobody ever rewrote code... we wouldn't have Linux.
~m
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:31:37 -0600
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> If you expect simple rebuilds (just changing the version in the spec
> file) to work, you can ask for help from proven packagers and
> probably get it. I'd probably be able to help depending on the
> timing. Kevin has been known to do th
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:17:48 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> John Reiser wrote:
> > I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements
> > have been "skyrocketing" over the last several releases.
>
> The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least:
> RHL 9: http://www.gurulabs.c
As mentioned in the FUDCon kernel talk, we are trying to figure out
exactly what causes the massive slowdown for some people with debug
kernels. At this point, debug is completely off in the rawhide kernel.
Every update this week will turn on more debug options until we find out
which one is causin
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 16:13:49 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach wrote:
The rebuild will likely be in a side tag and things won't be fixed until the
rebuild is complete. It may be better to do the manual rebuild for the affected
packages.
At first I'd planned to do it manually so I requested a tag
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:53:06 -0600
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
>Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> >It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I
> >wouldn't rebuild all of them manually, but I would wait for this
> >rebuild.
> >
> >Comments? Sugge
Le Lun 21 janvier 2013 16:47, Susi Lehtola a écrit :
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:30:04 +0100
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>> I would like to help this poor soul get his package into Fedora:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249
>>
>> (adobe-source-code-pro-fonts)
>>
>> I'm a packager
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 23:43:07 +0100,
Björn Persson wrote:
And since people don't check the certificate anyway it would be better
if Firefox would silently switch to plain HTTP when it can't verify the
certificate? Not just use the unverified certificate but skip all the
cryptography altoge
Summary of changes:
aa1c16c... * First Fedora build. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Summary of changes:
aa1c16c... * First Fedora build. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On 01/22/2013 03:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach wrote:
It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I
wouldn't rebuild all of them manually,
but I would wait for this rebuild.
Comments? Suggestions?
The rebuild will li
John Reiser wrote:
> I await documentation of claims that anaconda RAM requirements
> have been "skyrocketing" over the last several releases.
The officially documented RAM requirements are, at least:
RHL 9: http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/RELEASE-NOTES-RHL9.html
| Memory:
| - Minimum for text-m
On 01/22/2013 03:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach wrote:
It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I wouldn't
rebuild all of them manually,
but I would wait for this rebuild.
Comments? Suggestions?
The rebuild will like
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 15:19:18 +0100,
Petr Lautrbach wrote:
It's my understanding that there will be mass rebuild soon so I wouldn't
rebuild all of them manually,
but I would wait for this rebuild.
Comments? Suggestions?
The rebuild will likely be in a side tag and things won't be fixed
Hi all,
I'm going to push update cyrus-sasl-2.1.26 into Rawhide soon. Part of this
update
is also SONAME bump to libsasl2.so.3.
The main issue with this update is that it would break buildroot since there is
the openldap
package requiring libsasl2.so.2 which is part of buildroot. So I'll do ne
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 01/22/2013 07:43 PM +9:00:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +:
> > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
> >
> > There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the
> > following lines:
> >
> > %if "%
Richard W.M. Jones píše v Út 22. 01. 2013 v 08:19 +:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
>
> There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the
> following lines:
>
> %if "%{fedora}" >= "18"
> Conflicts: dracut < 024-23
> [...]
> %endif
> %if "
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/952/4890952/root.log
There's no conflict in dracut.spec. However mdadm.spec has the
following lines:
%if "%{fedora}" >= "18"
Conflicts: dracut < 024-23
[...]
%endif
%if "%{fedora}" >= "17"
Conflicts: dracut < 009-14
[...]
%endif
But as far as I c
61 matches
Mail list logo
