On 22 Jan 2013 20:35, "Josh Boyer" <jwbo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:23:44PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 14:13:23 -0500, > > Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote: > > >On 01/19/2013 05:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote > > > > > >>>The hundreds series is speific to the fedora version. Currently > > >>>f17 is 1xx and f18 is 2xx. The purpose is to keep f18 versions > > >>>ahead of f17 versions so that updates will work better. > > >.. > > >>Presumably as new kernels come out the base number will change to > > >>reflect the currently supported versions of Fedora. So that for the > > >>3.9 kernel, f18 will probably be 1xx and f19 2xx. > > > > > > > > >That's a pretty arcane scheme. Would it work to use 17xx, 18xx and > > >19xx instead? > > > > Probably. Putting the release after the dist tag would also probably > > work. > > We're not changing it again. It's just a number. The only reason > anyone even noticed is because it was a jump, but we've already been > doing this for months.
I agree. We really don't need a discussion as to the colour of the bike, the people who are maintaining shed have made the decision it will work. Peter
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
