As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:11
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and testin
Hi,
I have decided to take on pdfedit. I haven't found the devel email for
why it was orphaned, but I also haven't looked very hard. Someone
needs to keep this software in the repos, it may as well be me. I need
the RPM anyways.
Thanks,
-rhl
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.11.12 for Testing. This release includes support for
POSIX attributes in Windows Sync, several bug fixes, and cleanup of
various issues found by valgrind and Coverity. The 389 team would like
to thank Carsten Grzemba fo
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:13:04 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-08-31 12:32, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> >> From: Kevin Fenzi
> >> I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
> > >
> > > "This site provides status only for services managed directly by
> > Fedora
> > > Infrastructure"
> >
On 2012-08-31 12:32, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: Kevin Fenzi
I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
>
> "This site provides status only for services managed directly by
Fedora
> Infrastructure"
That's short and simple and drives the point home clear enough, I
think.
I preferre
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> I'd prefer to avoid a list... how about:
>
> "This site provides status only for services managed directly by Fedora
> Infrastructure"
That's short and simple and drives the point home clear enough, I think.
--
John Florian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:00:27 -0400
john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > We could add something to that effect perhaps.
> >
> > "We will not and cannot monitor the following Fedora-related
> > services: -Red Hat Bugzilla
> > -RPMFusion
> > -Fedora blogs
> > -Fedora news sites
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > We could add something to that effect perhaps.
>
> "We will not and cannot monitor the following Fedora-related services:
> -Red Hat Bugzilla
> -RPMFusion
> -Fedora blogs
> -Fedora news sites
> -Your Grandma's Fedora laptop"
Exactly! Great examples BTW and I really like
Just a heads up that I've just orphaned python-migrate in devel. Despite
playing around with it many times, I've never actually gotten to the point
where I could use it in the code I'm writing. Ralph Bean has also just
gotten python-alembic reviewed for Fedora. From a look at it, alembic
should
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We could add something to that effect perhaps.
"We will not and cannot monitor the following Fedora-related services:
-Red Hat Bugzilla
-RPMFusion
-Fedora blogs
-Fedora news sites
-Your Grandma's Fedora laptop"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admi
devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 08/31/2012 13:56:34:
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: 08/31/2012 13:56
> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:51:22 -0500
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many
>> > "why isn't bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the
>> > page had some hint that it only monitors s
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:51:22 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > That makes lots of sense, but I suspect you'll get just as many
> > "why isn't bugzilla shown here?" questions ... unless maybe the
> > page had some hint that it only monitors sites directly managed by
> > the Fedora Project, which is why
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, wrote:
> devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 08/31/2012 12:46:31:
>
>> From: Kevin Fenzi
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Date: 08/31/2012 12:47
>> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent by: devel-boun...@
Hi there,
I'm currently messing with xine-ui updates (sync with upstream 0.99.7,
epel6 build, split out xine-check). There were some plans in the past to
move all of xine to rpmfusion and, possibly, build more xine packages
from the same spec.
Is there any new development in this respect?
Michae
devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 08/31/2012 12:46:31:
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: 08/31/2012 12:47
> Subject: Re: Fedora Infrastructure announces status.fedoraproject.org
> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi Danishka,
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Danishka Navin
> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I would like to join for testing for the next release.
> >
> > How may I proceed?
>
> Great! We just
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:26 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >> I might have missed something, but are there plans to add bugzilla
> >> to this?
> >
> > It was suggested, but we don't actually run bugzilla.redhat.com or
> > have anything to do with it. So it would be a bit difficult to try
> > and repo
Hi Danishka,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I would like to join for testing for the next release.
>
> How may I proceed?
Great! We just posted our first F18 development build for the next
release which will be called 13.1.0.
I assume you have an XO wit
Hi Daniel,
I would like to join for testing for the next release.
How may I proceed?
Danishka
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 12.1.0 for XO-1,
> XO-1.5 and XO-1.75. Details of new features, known issues, and how t
Hi,
We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 12.1.0 for XO-1,
XO-1.5 and XO-1.75. Details of new features, known issues, and how to
download/install/upgrade can all be found in the release notes:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/12.1.0
Many thanks to all contributors, testers, upst
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:43:03 -0500
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
>> > Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >
>> >> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it ha
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:43:03 -0500
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
> > Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> >> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it happen!
> >>
> >> Will there be banners for when maintenance is go
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it happen!
>>
>> Will there be banners for when maintenance is going to happen/in
>> progress so that if there's an issue and we go th
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:45:49 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Looks really cool, congrats to all that made it happen!
>
> Will there be banners for when maintenance is going to happen/in
> progress so that if there's an issue and we go there it will let us
> know if it's an unplanned outage or whet
On 31 August 2012 15:25, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > 1- Since the packages I mantain build on RHEL5+ and Fedora 16+ (and have
> > for a long time), can I assume these macros in the spec file is optional?
> > If that's the case, what should I do with the bugs opened?
>
> I'd have to defer to FESCo on
On 08/31/2012 03:21 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
> According to the systemd snippets [1], the new macros should be only for
> NEW packages, i.e. those that never had a SysV init script.
The macros apply for both NEW packages and converted packages, in F18+.
There are additional triggers needed if con
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'm happy to announce the general availability of our
> status.fedoraproject.org site.
>
> This site provides an easy way for Fedora contributors and users to
> check on the status of services provided by Fedora Infrastructure.
>
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5284#comment:9 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
Hello,
sorry to bring up the discussion again but I still have some grey areas in
my head.
According to the systemd snippets [1], the new macros should be only for
NEW packages, i.e. those that never had a SysV init script.
I have a few questions:
1- Since the packages I mantain build on RHEL5+
30 matches
Mail list logo
