The both adapters have to be running simultaneously.
I can explain how it worked in Windows 7:
1. The Main Monitor is connected using the Nvidia card's VGA output.
2. After installing Windows 7, download the Nvidia Drivers. Once
installed you will see Nvidia icon in system tray.
3. The Motherbo
Can someone who has one of the motherboards here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1155 which supports using Intel's
built-in GPU, and a dedicated GPU card like Nvidia, test?
That is, to see if using multiple video adapters simultaneously works
in Fedora 17? Please.
PS. My specs right now are:
M
On 10 June 2012 18:18, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
[..]
>
> Therefore, I have rereleased ownership of raptor. Maintainer(s) of flickurl
> and
> rawstudio (CCed), please either pick up raptor, or port your package(s) to
> raptor2, or both.
>
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for mail. I will look at flickurl. New
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:43:05 +0300
Jonathan Dieter escribió:
> On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > This was an issue in the f17-updates and f17-updates-testing mash
> > configs that bodhi was using.
> >
> > I just pushed out an
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place tomorrow (Wednesday June
13th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
Current items on the agenda:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:48 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > No offense, but you seem to have a very unusual idea about how much leverage
> > Fedora has anywhere. Why would hardware vendors listen to a community
> > distribution that they
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 13:11 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > You are, and that was being very un-excellent, so please refrain from it
> > in future.
>
> I'm left wondering where your concern about being excellent to each
> other has been
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 09:46 -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:08 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
>
> > Let Fedora help bring to market better hardware.
> >
> > Do not agre
On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 23:16 -0700, Malcolm Turmel wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1155
>
> The above article lists all the LGA 1155 motherboards which "Allows
> using built-in GPU" also known as Integrated GPU / iGPU. But basically
> it is talking about the Integrated GPU which comes wi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 08:10 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
>> Due to my respect to your request, I thought about it for nearly 72
>> hours. I still stand behind what I said: People who are incapable of
>> switching a BIOS setting, which might involve doing
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 00:37 +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
>
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9040/lighttpd-1.4.31-1.fc17
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9103/quagga-0.99.21-2
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I was building a package and not getting any debuginfo packages, and
> luckily rdieter was around to tell me (again) that I was missing the
> redhat-rpm-config package.
>
> Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:12:44PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The text I was responding to was:
> "Why would hardware vendors listen to a community distribution that
> they never preinstall, have no plans to preinstall, and brings them
> absolutely no money?"
>
> And my point was that if the
Hmm. Sorry, that is the only article I found on the subject (having
searched for "Linus Torvalds Fedora" on search engines). There was also a
summary on LinuxToday, which then linked the same ZDnet article.
2012/6/12 Peter Jones
> Aside Linus being incorrect, the rest of the article is also full
Greetings.
As previously announced[1], the recent Board election resulted in a
two-way tie for the third elected seat, between Nick Bebout and Robert
'Bob' Jensen.
The runoff election for this remaining seat has started. Voting began
today, Tuesday, June 12, at 00:00:00 UTC, and will end Wednesd
I was building a package and not getting any debuginfo packages, and
luckily rdieter was around to tell me (again) that I was missing the
redhat-rpm-config package.
Why is redhat-rpm-config not a dependancy dragged in by rpm-build?
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 06/12/2012 04:16 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
I cannot guarantee that any particular negotiation with Lenovo,
nor with Dell, will succeed. But certainly negotiating only with
ourselves, without even trying to negotiate with Lenovo/Dell,
will result i
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/388
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/388/0001-Ticket-388-Improve-replication-agreement-status-mess.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Reynolds
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedorapr
On 06/12/2012 04:16 PM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> I cannot guarantee that any particular negotiation with Lenovo,
> nor with Dell, will succeed. But certainly negotiating only with
> ourselves, without even trying to negotiate with Lenovo/Dell,
> will result in a loss for us.
I'm not sure why you a
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jay Sulzberger (j...@panix.com) said:
> There is here no irrestible tide. Rather, Fedora is jumping to
> surrender before engagement.
>
> Secret discussions with Microsoft is perhaps part of this
> engagement. But such discussion is not the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> No, they literally cannot do that. Having a special debugging key that
> chains to a CA key that's in the key database (DB), which would allow the
> ability to do kernel debugging activities which could, for example, write
> to arbitrary memory
On 06/12/2012 01:46 PM, Denis Arnaud wrote:
> Though most of you already certainly know about it, Linus Torvalds has
> expressed his point of view about that story:
> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-windows-8-uefi-and-fedora/11187
Yes, though he's wrong on some facts. Not
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This was an issue in the f17-updates and f17-updates-testing mash
> configs that bodhi was using.
>
> I just pushed out an updated setting that should fix it.
>
> Sorry we missed it at final. Basically we had everything in place, but
> it
On 06/12/2012 11:33 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
>> This seems like a pretty unlikely scenario. You have to disable secure boot
>> to perform most kernel-level debugging operations in Windows 8. It'd
>> alienate
>> pretty much the entire OEM com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> Quit trying to have it both ways, Greg. If we get vendors to let us ship a
> Red Hat key - and to be clear, it was a *Red Hat* key that's been offered
> to be shipped - then we're putting forked projects and stuff in a
> significantly worse pos
On 06/12/2012 01:11 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> You are, and that was being very un-excellent, so please refrain from it
>> in future.
>
> I'm left wondering where your concern about being excellent to each
> other has been hiding throu
On 06/12/2012 01:48 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> No offense, but you seem to have a very unusual idea about how much leverage
>> Fedora has anywhere. Why would hardware vendors listen to a community
>> distribution that they never preinsta
This was an issue in the f17-updates and f17-updates-testing mash
configs that bodhi was using.
I just pushed out an updated setting that should fix it.
Sorry we missed it at final. Basically we had everything in place, but
it was waiting for the actual final repos to exist and be open. It
shou
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> No offense, but you seem to have a very unusual idea about how much leverage
> Fedora has anywhere. Why would hardware vendors listen to a community
> distribution that they never preinstall, have no plans to preinstall, and
> brings them a
Though most of you already certainly know about it, Linus Torvalds has
expressed his point of view about that story:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linus-torvalds-on-windows-8-uefi-and-fedora/11187
Kinds regards
D
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
Jay Sulzberger (j...@panix.com) said:
> There is here no irrestible tide. Rather, Fedora is jumping to
> surrender before engagement.
>
> Secret discussions with Microsoft is perhaps part of this
> engagement. But such discussion is not the whole battle.
>
> Fedora should call a conference to
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:20:51 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote
>
>> See $subject. I'm assuming that this is because delta_dirs in the
>> mash config doesn't include the updates repository, just the GA
>> repository.
>
> I'm not sure I fo
Hi.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:20:51 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote
> See $subject. I'm assuming that this is because delta_dirs in the
> mash config doesn't include the updates repository, just the GA
> repository.
I'm not sure I follow you. I do get deltas for my F17 updates.
--
"The Board views
On 06/12/2012 01:11 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Let me make this more clear: People in this thread have been saying
> that instructions can't be created because the hardware is not
> available to the public yet. However, the people working this stuff
> actually do have access to UEFI secureboot
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> You are, and that was being very un-excellent, so please refrain from it
> in future.
I'm left wondering where your concern about being excellent to each
other has been hiding throughout this thread, and where it was when
you made the "Yo
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:08 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> Let Fedora help bring to market better hardware.
>
> Do not agree that Microsoft should have the Hardware Root Key on
> just about all x86 style computers for sale next year.
That tide
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:08 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
>
> > Let Fedora help bring to market better hardware.
> >
> > Do not agree that Microsoft should have the Hardware Root Key on
> > just about all x86 style computers for sale next ye
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 11:08 -0400, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
> Let Fedora help bring to market better hardware.
>
> Do not agree that Microsoft should have the Hardware Root Key on
> just about all x86 style computers for sale next year.
That tide still appears to be coming in despite your commands,
commit 96bd42516bddadd845ff3af6bffdf60a8cbd5605
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:29:51 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-IPC-Run3.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IPC-Run3.spec b/perl-IPC-Run3.spec
index 2ca375f..6b042ed 10064
commit 3e0b4b762a3c96268fa994990586d6f5a1f2c030
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:29:34 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-HTML-TagCloud.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-TagCloud.spec b/perl-HTML-TagCloud.spec
index 4fdab56
commit 1edf230e455bd474905a25964b24d42aa4c1cf08
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 18:29:19 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Convert-Binary-C.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Convert-Binary-C.spec b/perl-Convert-Binary-C.spec
inde
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 10:17 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > Of course we are missing that part *now*, there is no motherboard with UEFI
> > and Secure Boot in the wild so we can take screenshots and publish them.
> > Once such board will be
On 06/12/2012 10:58 AM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 06/12/2012 12:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
The point is we have a target audience:
http://fedoraproject
commit 3a4934a27a1f234981a5b684b0b1750cfc99fba0
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:41:20 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-HTML-Quoted.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Quoted.spec b/perl-HTML-Quoted.spec
index 64d538f..2513
commit d6ba3794c134cc7e861276ea9e23dccb31c6feed
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:39:08 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Test-Portability-Files.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Portability-Files.spec b/perl-Test-Portabili
Le mardi 12 juin 2012 à 10:58 -0400, Jay Sulzberger a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, drago01 wrote:
>
> >
> > No because secure boot does not limit your freedom in *any* way. If
> > you want to hack on the kernel or other low level stuff flip a switch
> > in the firmware.
> > It is reasonable
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> This seems like a pretty unlikely scenario. You have to disable secure boot
> to perform most kernel-level debugging operations in Windows 8. It'd
> alienate
> pretty much the entire OEM community for Windows add-on card drivers, pretty
> much
commit 874d512f4896352e47c19ac10baecc06908ac6bd
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:11:15 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Class-Data-Inheritable.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Class-Data-Inheritable.spec b/perl-Class-Data-Inh
commit c0ab93a0b288399d34dd5774dbefb6aa92682978
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:11:16 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-HTML-Form.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-HTML-Form.spec b/perl-HTML-Form.spec
index 4203237..3f7c600 10
commit 61e8bf974dbfcb9a48da5840db41aa5cb9158167
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:11:06 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Directory-Queue.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Directory-Queue.spec b/perl-Directory-Queue.spec
index 4
commit 748998640f8d6c95f372cbee3c166507f37bc922
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:10:11 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec b/perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec
index 8983db1..88c4
commit 720ce0a3ea62c786ae75c5a76973006835ff8c78
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:10:06 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Math-BigInt-GMP.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP.spec b/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP.spec
index 9
commit d3ab6d5ac034dcec046ceac3724f352abd47ac3e
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:10:00 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Time-Duration.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Time-Duration.spec b/perl-Time-Duration.spec
index 8610b22
commit f7fd4fee1811f5e14442f0ab41d9d614715b33eb
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:09:55 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Module-Runtime.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Runtime.spec b/perl-Module-Runtime.spec
index e2ed
commit fe7904caa92f775b3de191be3809396f3dc079b4
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:09:50 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-IPC-Run-SafeHandles.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IPC-Run-SafeHandles.spec b/perl-IPC-Run-SafeHandles.
commit 85ff55e8899d82fd12959806bd2a407ec817291a
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:09:43 2012 +0200
Specify all dependencies
perl-Archive-Zip.spec | 17 +++--
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Archive-Zip.spec b/perl-Archive-Zip.spec
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/12/2012 08:10 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Due to my respect to your request, I thought about it for nearly 72
hours. I still stand behind what I said: People who are incapable of
switching a BIOS setting, which might involve doing a simple web
sear
commit fe06e08d640b4e7d26ed599b6a723096bea5dfef
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:03:27 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Hash-MultiValue.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Hash-MultiValue.spec b/perl-Hash-MultiValue.spec
index e
commit bccfd4d20f252da868f315697ad0395c05e56884
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:03:23 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec b/perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec
index cd3b17f..093b
commit 5778fcddb7eae878e7bb50705ad44b5d801e1f26
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 17:03:24 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Data-Random.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Data-Random.spec b/perl-Data-Random.spec
index e413105..5b90
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Nicu Buculei
wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 12:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The point is we have a target audience:
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base
>>>
On 06/12/2012 09:00 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
This is MS classic ploy against free software embrace and extend. First it
will be it can be disabled then for windows 9 if you want to have approved
hardware MS will require, like ARM, x86 secure boot can not be disabled and
they will point to Fedora an
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-SQLite:
b8ac1c584befa63cd5ffc391b2366e84 DBD-SQLite-1.37.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
commit 9316d41d8b528b52e65d431bdff045dccd0cfa03
Author: mpaladin
Date: Tue Jun 12 16:02:19 2012 +0200
Initial import (#830811).
.gitignore |1 +
perl-No-Worries.spec | 71 ++
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 73
commit ae9446548c99ce81e5cf6d8232530f119befb1d6
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 15:58:06 2012 +0200
Adapt tests to perl 5.16
perl-rpm-build-perl.spec |4 ++
rpm-build-perl-0.80-Adapt-to-perl-5.16.0.patch | 36
2 files changed, 40 in
On 06/12/2012 08:10 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Due to my respect to your request, I thought about it for nearly 72
hours. I still stand behind what I said: People who are incapable of
switching a BIOS setting, which might involve doing a simple web
search beforehand, should better not touch any el
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831192
Bug ID: 831192
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: mmasl...@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831191
Bug ID: 831191
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: mmasl...@redhat.c
commit 8c56143601d0db26a200b78bbc94fb2611950395
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Tue Jun 12 15:01:42 2012 +0200
Perl 5.16 rebuild
perl-Crypt-Primes.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-Primes.spec b/perl-Crypt-Primes.spec
index c16d71d..2
On 06/12/2012 06:15 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
On 06/12/2012 12:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
The point is we have a target audience:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base
Our desired users ARE con
On 06/12/2012 08:10 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
On 09/06/12 19:34, drago01 wrote:
If Fedora does not implement some form of Secure Boot support,
See $subject. I'm assuming that this is because delta_dirs in the mash
config doesn't include the updates repository, just the GA repository.
Maybe this should be more clearly stated in
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/fedora-releases.txt,
Step 4 (Enable Updates)?
Jonathan
si
commit 8b6af65f1b78743f6ebde9ff0d0bf1e3ef30f055
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue Jun 12 12:59:31 2012 +0100
Spec clean-up
- Don't use macros for system commands
- Don't need to remove empty directories from the buildroot
- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
- Use %
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Chris Smart wrote:
On 09/06/12 19:34, drago01 wrote:
>> > If Fedora does not implement some form of Secure Boot support, 100% of
>> > Fedora users
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 12:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The point is we have a target audience:
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base
>>>
>>> Our desired users ARE contributors.
>>
>>
On 06/12/2012 12:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
The point is we have a target audience:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base
Our desired users ARE contributors.
We do have a mission as well: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview#Our_Mission
"T
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 10:16 AM, drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> We do already exclude contributors for such "dubious reasons"
>>
>>
>> Well you accuse other of not being able to "read a wiki ..." so
On 06/12/2012 10:16 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
We do already exclude contributors for such "dubious reasons"
Well you accuse other of not being able to "read a wiki ..." so please
read what I wrote.
"excluding *users* for such dubious reasons ." ..
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 05:55 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Excuse me, but "people like him" used to be our (Fedora's) target
>>> audience.
>>> Have a read at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_
79 matches
Mail list logo
