On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> In fact, systemd offers quite a number security features to secure your
> services wich can be easily used to enhance local security. I'll
> probably blog about this soonishly, but there's a lot of nice stuff in
> there. For example, set
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 20:09 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> >
> >>> -Steve
> >> Obviously a lot on this list value boot up speed over security!
> >
> > You're making a false assumption, whic
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:33:58PM -0400, Douglas Landgraf wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> On 08/22/2011 01:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > (Sent on behalf of jima, the former owner)
> >
> > The dnsmasq package in Fedora has now been orphaned. This package is in
> > need of a new maintainer and sh
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 22:24 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:33:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > > We'll be doing this in #fedora-kernel next Monday (22nd)
> > > I expect that the wiki page will continue to evolve as we start working
> > > on this, and perhaps this
Weird, I know I am submitting a f16 update to f16. So not sure why
mine isn't going. I tried two different packages of mine and still
gives me a problem.
Though with one "clex", after I run fedpkg build, after koji
finishes, it gives me:
BuildError: package clex is blocked for tag f16-updates-can
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:33:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We'll be doing this in #fedora-kernel next Monday (22nd)
> > I expect that the wiki page will continue to evolve as we start working
> > on this, and perhaps this can even become a regular thing.
>
> apologies for not help
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 20:58 -0500, Nathan Owe wrote:
> Is there a block or something for submitting packages into F16? I am
> trying to request an update to add packages I have in F15 into F16 and
> bodhi gives me a error saying that package not tagged as an update.
it's not entirely clear from yo
Is there a block or something for submitting packages into F16? I am trying to
request an update to add packages I have in F15 into F16 and bodhi gives me a
error saying that package not tagged as an update.
Thanks
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
[SNIP]
>> Is this all I need? It does not depend on any other service that I know of.
>
> Depends. If this daemon provides some interface to local clients you
> either want to make it socket activatable (requires patching) or use
> "Type=f
On Mon, 22.08.11 17:19, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 20:09 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > On 08/22/2011 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> > >
> > >>> -Steve
> > >> Obviously a lot on this li
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 20:09 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> >
> >>> -Steve
> >> Obviously a lot on this list value boot up speed over security!
> >
> > You're making a false assumption, whic
On 08/22/2011 07:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>
>>> -Steve
>> Obviously a lot on this list value boot up speed over security!
>
> You're making a false assumption, which is that socket activation is
> only about speed. It's also about resou
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Sent on behalf of jima, the former owner)
>
> The dnsmasq package in Fedora has now been orphaned. This package is in
> need of a new maintainer and should not be allowed to lapse, as it is a
> critical component of the virtualization features.
>
>
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:31:49 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:41:43 -0600,
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:14 +
> > Branched Report wrote:
> >
> > > Compose started at Mon Aug 22 13:15:30 UTC 2011
> >
> > The repodiff/spam-o-matic failed here,
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> > -Steve
> Obviously a lot on this list value boot up speed over security!
You're making a false assumption, which is that socket activation is
only about speed. It's also about resource usage. (There may be other
advantages I haven't consid
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 20:34 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> You're not seeing the hundreds - no thousands of emails about systemd? You
> are not
Most of which seem to come from you, Reindl, or Steve Clark; a very
active cabal doth not a rebellion make.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 10:59 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 17:50:21 +0200,
> Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since days it's not possible to update my F16 system fully (a lot of
> > updates are refused because of dependency problems [see BZ 731617]).
> >
> > Anyb
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:36 -0400, Eric Mesa wrote:
> Why does KMyMoney in Rawhide not have OFX input compiled? It is in Fedora 15.
>
> Thanks,
> -
>
> Eric Mesa
>
> http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com
>
> Most of the emails from this account should be signed with my GPG key so
> that
Am 22.08.2011 22:48, schrieb Kai Engert:
> On 21.08.2011 23:53, Heiko Adams wrote:
>> Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert:
>>> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but
>
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:32 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> We've been planning on doing one of these forever, but never seeming
> to get around to it.
>
> The kernel gets a lot of bugs (possibly more than any other package),
> and as such, we've got nearly a thousand bugs open right now, and just
> th
Am 22.08.2011 23:58, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:15:38 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 22.08.2011 23:01, schrieb Tom Callaway:
>>> On 08/22/2011 04:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I'd vote for simply making this an implementation detail of the
package. I.
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 13:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:21:17AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Of course with this method SVG is not an option
>
> If you _did_ have an SVG, then I can tell you that this is the only
> format you need. GNOME and XFCE appear to
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:15:38 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.08.2011 23:01, schrieb Tom Callaway:
> > On 08/22/2011 04:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> I'd vote for simply making this an implementation detail of the
> >> package. I.e. if a package gets the permission to enable its
>
Am 22.08.2011 23:01, schrieb Tom Callaway:
> On 08/22/2011 04:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> I'd vote for simply making this an implementation detail of the
>> package. I.e. if a package gets the permission to enable its service by
>> default it's up to it whether it wants to be started at b
Am 22.08.2011 16:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>
>>
>> Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>>> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
>>> what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the
>>> above?
>>> For games, many would argue the pushing the
On 08/22/2011 04:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I'd vote for simply making this an implementation detail of the
> package. I.e. if a package gets the permission to enable its service by
> default it's up to it whether it wants to be started at boot or via
> socket actviation of via any other ki
On Mon, 22.08.11 15:16, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm working on a review request for spacenavd[1] which is a daemon for
> providing access to 3D input devices that use the library libspnav.
>
> I have not built a package that uses sysv for systemd yet so this is my first.
>
>
On 08/21/2011 10:19 AM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:04:48 +0200
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will
>> be possible in F16?
>
> Hi Joachim,
>
> It won't be possible in the near future, because it's orphaned:
> ht
On 21.08.2011 23:53, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert:
>> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but
I suspect that Seamonkey is generally compl
On Mon, 22.08.11 15:09, Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On 08/22/2011 01:29 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that we kicked this up to FESCo and they decided to treat
> > them the same (although the latter may not have come to a formal vote and
> > only been discussed
Welcome, Jaroslav!
Thank you for packaging your software for Fedora.
-Bill
--
Bill McGonigle, Owner
BFC Computing, LLC
http://bfccomputing.com/
Telephone: +1.855.SW.LIBRE
Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com
VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf
Social networks: bill_mcgonigle/bill.mc
I'm working on a review request for spacenavd[1] which is a daemon for
providing access to 3D input devices that use the library libspnav.
I have not built a package that uses sysv for systemd yet so this is my first.
I have a working sysv init script based on the provided template but
it would p
On 08/22/2011 01:29 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that we kicked this up to FESCo and they decided to treat
> them the same (although the latter may not have come to a formal vote and
> only been discussed during their IRC meetings on the overall subject.) Going
> back to the quote i
With xpdf 3.03 (going into updates for f14, f15, f16, rawhide), the
license has changed from GPLv2 to GPLv2 or GPLv3 (note: not GPLv2+).
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 14:09 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Still needs the period in the description.
>
> Note that if you're including this for Fedora 16, you'll want to talk
> to the
> translation team, as this is a new translatable string.
>
> Bill
Hello Bill,
Thanks for the info. I shall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hello Stephen,
On 08/22/2011 01:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Sent on behalf of jima, the former owner)
>
> The dnsmasq package in Fedora has now been orphaned. This package is in
> need of a new maintainer and should not be allowed to lapse, as it is a
> critical component of the virtualizat
Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said:
> > I agree - Medical Software or Medical Applications is better. After all,
> > other derived distributions might pull from the repository or comps file.
> >
> > Description, if included, should end with a period.
> >
> > Other than that, looks OK.
> >
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said:
> > On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 10:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:28:38AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > You may have noticed a lot of p
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:41:43 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:14 +
> Branched Report wrote:
>
> > Compose started at Mon Aug 22 13:15:30 UTC 2011
>
> The repodiff/spam-o-matic failed here, but the compose did finish as
> far as I can tell.
>
> kevin
Were the ba
(Sent on behalf of jima, the former owner)
The dnsmasq package in Fedora has now been orphaned. This package is in
need of a new maintainer and should not be allowed to lapse, as it is a
critical component of the virtualization features.
It is used by libvirt to manage DNS/dhcp for client VMs hos
On Aug 21, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 16:02:08 -0600,
> Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:31:55 -0700
>> John Reiser wrote:
>>
How much memory will anaconda require to install Fedora 16?
>>>
>>> Anaconda requires 768MB, and more (>=1GB)
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:14 +
Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Mon Aug 22 13:15:30 UTC 2011
The repodiff/spam-o-matic failed here, but the compose did finish as
far as I can tell.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-08-22)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 16:59:43 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-22/fesco.2011-08-22-16.59.log.html
Meeting summary
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-22
13:28:36 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-1.224-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611438
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519321&action=edit
From 820c1c3f018c5fdb8e547740edb58bc1c0a558de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:25:21 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 611438 - Add Account Usability
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:45:40PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 08/18/2011 06:28 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 17.08.11 16:43, Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Oh, I just noticed this:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd#Socket_activatio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-22
13:28:28 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-1.224-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
On 08/22/2011 12:03 PM, JB wrote:
Steve Grubb redhat.com> writes:
...
You're not seeing the hundreds - no thousands of emails about systemd?
You are not seeing that all the expected facilities of init are not covered?
There is well founded rebellion here.
...
Yes, you are right. And the peop
commit b449ca26397301685d39dfda026ca00d72c191e6
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Mon Aug 22 13:18:40 2011 -0400
1.224
perl-Gtk2.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2.spec b/perl-Gtk2.spec
index 844c998..
Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said:
> On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 10:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:28:38AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > You may have noticed a lot of packaging activity on the fedora-medical
> > > front[1]. There are stil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731907
--- Comment #6 from Petr Sabata 2011-08-22 13:05:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (...)
> Review request for perl-Digest-Pe
commit 8f4552a810c84929bb3872c4f30318402b65
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Mon Aug 22 12:50:22 2011 -0400
1.224
perl-Gtk2.spec | 22 --
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2.spec b/perl-Gtk2.spec
On 08/18/2011 06:28 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 17.08.11 16:43, Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Oh, I just noticed this:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd#Socket_activation
>> "Since Fedora currently doesn't want any services to do on-demand
>>
On 08/18/2011 10:00 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>> I'm not sure about this as I really don't want to include the full
>> headers. How much of the email is actually required?
>
>> From the apropos wiki page[1]:
> "A copy of the email, containing full headers, must be included as a source
> file"
Steve Grubb redhat.com> writes:
> ...
> You're not seeing the hundreds - no thousands of emails about systemd?
> You are not seeing that all the expected facilities of init are not covered?
> There is well founded rebellion here.
> ...
Yes, you are right. And the people (e-mails, posts) you refe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731907
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Hello,
I didn't want to continue this discussion until I have a working F16 setup.
Recently
something got fixed so that install now works...so...
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 10:39:26 AM Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 08:47 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > My main concern is that the m
Compose started at Mon Aug 22 13:15:30 UTC 2011
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I'm going to update gdbm to 1.9.1 in Rawhide tomorrow (or in a few
days). However, the soname has been bumped, so some packages will need
to be rebuilt. I will reply to this message as soon as gdbm-1.9.1-1 is
built.
List of packages that require gdbm:
Macaulay2
OpenIPMI
OpenIPMI-libs
avah
Excerpts from Denis Arnaud's message of Sun Aug 21 15:05:59 +0200 2011:
> Hello Olivier,
>
> 2011/8/21
>
> > I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> > Jpackage. I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
> >
> > What is the usual behavior
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 14:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
>> what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the above?
>> For games, many would argue the pushing the l
>
> Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
>> what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the
>> above?
>> For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and greatest to every
>> release is good.
Am 21.08.2011 23:09, schrieb Steve Clark:
>>> Read the part about "Parallelizing Socket Services". It explains why
>>> socket actviation is interesting,
>> I find a secure OS interesting. Bootup speed does not matter much to me.
>>
>> -Steve
> Obviously a lot on this list value boot up speed over
Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
> what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the above?
> For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and greatest to every
> release is good. I might agr
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
no tickets
= New business =
#659 Sponsor Request:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663069
--- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot 2011-08-22 10:08:57
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Th updated version fails to start wi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26:29AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Noriko Mizumoto
> wrote:
> > Dear Fedora package maintainers
> >
> > To have Fedora 16 high standard in non-English versions, Fedora
> > Localization will have our review packages process using the i
Hello!
below are two bugs for getting softraided (raid level 1) /boot to
work properly with f16 alpha rc5:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732164
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732441
left to test:
* softraiding two disks as mirror and putting an lvm on top... then
put
On 08/21/2011 06:56 PM, Nathan Owe wrote:
> I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following error using
> rpmlint:
> rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
> c-icap.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
> c-icap.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732254
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On 14:19:51 Monday 22 August 2011 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Dim 21 août 2011 13:24, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
> > What is the usual behavior in this case ? Should I check with maintainer
> > if package can be "moved" to Fedora ? (and do it myself if he does not
> > wish to do so)
>
> If done clea
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Noriko Mizumoto
wrote:
> Dear Fedora package maintainers
>
> To have Fedora 16 high standard in non-English versions, Fedora
> Localization will have our review packages process using the image
> composed specifically for this purpose. This image will be composed
>
Le Dim 21 août 2011 13:24, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
> What is the usual behavior in this case ? Should I check with maintainer if
> package can be "moved" to Fedora ? (and do it myself if he does not wish to do
> so)
If done cleanly importing packages from JPackage to Fedora is fine and will be
Excerpts from Olivier Sallou's message of Sun Aug 21 13:24:16 +0200
2011:
> Hi,
> I have a question regarding packaging for Fedora.
>
>
> I want to package an application that depends on jets3t. It is packaged in
> Jpackage.
> I see in fact that many Java packages are available in JPackage.
>
>
>
Am 22.08.2011 02:56, schrieb Nathan Owe:
> I am currently working on packaging c-icap I get the following error
> using rpmlint: rpmlint
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/c-icap-0.1.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
> c-icap.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib c-icap.x86_64: W:
> devel-file-in-non-dev
76 matches
Mail list logo
