Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:32:15 +1000 > Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > >> What do you mean "leave it alone"? The people using it WANT the >> changes. Why are you telling them how they can use their system? > > Not at all. :) > >> They want the changes, it's trivial for me to give the

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:32:15 +1000 Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > What do you mean "leave it alone"? The people using it WANT the > changes. Why are you telling them how they can use their system? Not at all. :) > They want the changes, it's trivial for me to give them the changes, > why wouldn't I gi

Re: KompoZer packaging/review

2010-10-11 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/11/2010 5:06 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > If any mozilla/xulrunner experienced packagers would mind helping out with the > kompozer package, that would be appreciated. > Sorry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:44 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > Sadly enough, this means that a shiny Ubuntu installer is to the whole > distribution what GNOME shell is to the GNOME project. It doesn't matter > if you've got a lot of bells and whistles underneath, or what you can > do, if you don't look p

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Chris Lumens (clum...@redhat.com) said: > > > - downloads updates in parallel too > > > > Package updates? > > 1) Given that it's using yum, downloading multiple things in parallel > would need to be fixed there. > 2) If it means downl

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:32:15AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > >> What do you mean "leave it alone"? The people using it WANT the changes. >> Why are you telling them how they can use their system? > > Because by pushing updates you're also potentially making it imposs

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said: > > That is certainly a big part of the problem. Anaconda does a _ton_ of > > crap that only very few users care about. And keeping all these minority > > features from falling apart is leaving y

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:12:35AM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Matthew Garrett [11/10/2010 19:57] : > > > > debian-installer? Yes. > > Shipping 2 different installers is a recipe for disaster from a user and > QA perspective.Choose one between Ubiquity, Debian-installer and Anaconda. Ubiqui

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:32:15AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > What do you mean "leave it alone"? The people using it WANT the changes. > Why are you telling them how they can use their system? Because by pushing updates you're also potentially making it impossible for people who don't want n

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Lars Seipel
On Monday 11 October 2010 23:44:01 Farkas Levente wrote: > but our opinion simple do not count. better is what most user like. period. We all know that's not true. In an ideal world the best things would also be those with the most success. Sadly, in reality this doesn't apply. Just look what th

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:23:24AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 >>> Jeff Fearn wrote: >>> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 > "Pavel Alexeev (ak

Re: e4defrag support?

2010-10-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 6 października 2010 15:42 użytkownik Eric Sandeen napisał: > Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 6 października 2010 05:01 użytkownik Eric Sandeen >> napisał: > > ... > >>> cool!  I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just >>> build your own e2fsprogs to get it ... >> >> I a

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:23:24AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 > > Jeff Fearn wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 > >>> "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" wrot

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 > Jeff Fearn wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 >>> "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" wrote: >>> In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons t

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/11/2010 08:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:44:49 -0500, > Chris Adams wrote: > >>> I think that is a misfeature. I don't want anything irreversible to be done >>> until I say go. >>> >> You know that Fedora has done partitioning/mkfs about halfway throu

KompoZer packaging/review

2010-10-11 Thread Orion Poplawski
If any mozilla/xulrunner experienced packagers would mind helping out with the kompozer package, that would be appreciated. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...

F-14 Branched report: 20101011 changes

2010-10-11 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Oct 11 20:23:17 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 gnome-pi

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Chris Lumens
> Shipping 2 different installers is a recipe for disaster from a user and > QA perspective.Choose one between Ubiquity, Debian-installer and Anaconda. We only ship one installer, and that is anaconda. I suppose you could argue over whether livecd is its own thing or not, but that's a nitpicky de

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Matthew Garrett [11/10/2010 19:57] : > > debian-installer? Yes. Shipping 2 different installers is a recipe for disaster from a user and QA perspective.Choose one between Ubiquity, Debian-installer and Anaconda. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedora

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-10-12)

2010-10-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #topic Updates policy #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 #

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Farkas Levente
On 10/11/2010 06:09 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > >> Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks >> ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing >> 747. >> Sure, both can accomplish the sam

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Lars Seipel
On Monday 11 October 2010 12:41:13 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This is in contrast to anaconda (certainly from the live CD install) > which seems to be a usability no-go area. > > Thoughts? Can we switch to their installer? > > Rich. It may be nice usability-wise but it lacks support for LVM2,

Re: Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-10-11 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/10 1:57 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > John Poelstra redhat.com> writes: > >> Mon 11-Oct Mon 11-Oct Submit Installer Builds for Final TC Compose > > Does this mean that the (real) TC1 ISOs will show up tonight (instead of > October > 12)? >

Re: Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-10-11 Thread Andre Robatino
John Poelstra redhat.com> writes: > Mon 11-Oct Mon 11-Oct Submit Installer Builds for Final TC Compose Does this mean that the (real) TC1 ISOs will show up tonight (instead of October 12)? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:51 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:44:49 -0500, > Chris Adams wrote: > > > > > > I think that is a misfeature. I don't want anything irreversible to be > > > done > > > until I say go. > > > > You know that Fedora has done partitioning/mkfs

[Bug 357641] EL branches perl-Tk

2010-10-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357641 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-10-11 15:41:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://

'milkymist' group in comps?

2010-10-11 Thread Bill Nottingham
1) When you added this to F14/F15/EL6, you added a typo; this broke the F-14 branched compose and the EPEL updates push. *Please* verify your changes before pushing. 2) Aside from that... how does this merit a separate group? - We already have the electronic lab group - If we add a group each for

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Christian Krause
Hi, On 10/11/2010 07:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:20:54 -0400 > Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we upgrade banshee (and >> banshee-community-extensions) to 1.8.0 in F13. I estimate that this >> will close about half our open bugs. Doing this will r

[389-devel] Please Review: (544321) remove-ds.pl should not throw fatal error is selinux port label is not found

2010-10-11 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544321 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=452770&action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On 10/11/2010 01:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:20:54 -0400 > Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we upgrade banshee (and >> banshee-community-extensions) to 1.8.0 in F13. I estimate that this >> will close about half our open bugs. Doing this will requir

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On 10/11/2010 01:50 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Would the libgpod update require rebuilding or changing anything >> else? How many other packages depend on that? > > The libgpod update should be safe. Though if it was up to me I'd wait > for libgpod to reach 0.8.0. Upstrea

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread seth vidal
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Chris Lumens (clum...@redhat.com) said: > > > - downloads updates in parallel too > > > > Package updates? > > 1) Given that it's using yum, downloading multiple things in parallel > would need to be fixed there. We have an open rfe

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:44:49 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > > I think that is a misfeature. I don't want anything irreversible to be done > > until I say go. > > You know that Fedora has done partitioning/mkfs about halfway through > the install for a while now, right? I don't see why th

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:09 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks > > ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing > > 747. > > Sure, both can acc

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Todd Zullinger
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Would the libgpod update require rebuilding or changing anything > else? How many other packages depend on that? The libgpod update should be safe. Though if it was up to me I'd wait for libgpod to reach 0.8.0. Upstream is treating 0.7.95 like a release candidate. I don't

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:41:13 +0100, > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > Some of the things it does which are IMHO better: > > > > - starts disk formatting / copying / installing in parallel > >with asking user questions > > I think that is

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:20:54 -0400 Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > I'd like to propose that we upgrade banshee (and > banshee-community-extensions) to 1.8.0 in F13. I estimate that this > will close about half our open bugs. Doing this will require the > following package upgrades in F13: > > * cl

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:41:13 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > Some of the things it does which are IMHO better: > > - starts disk formatting / copying / installing in parallel >with asking user questions I think that is a misfeature. I don't want anything irreversible to be don

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Ah, if I understand correctly you don't need to do anything. It's just default which is off, and could be on by user demand. But, it would be better to have the default is "on". On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > Christian, do you have any objections to enabling this? >

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Jos Vos
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:07:26PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > That is certainly a big part of the problem. Anaconda does a _ton_ of > crap that only very few users care about. And keeping all these minority > features from falling apart is leaving you no time to polish the user > experience f

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread James Laska
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said: > > That is certainly a big part of the problem. Anaconda does a _ton_ of > > crap that only very few users care about. And keeping all these minority > > features from falling apart is leaving y

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 Jeff Fearn wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 > > "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" wrote: > > > > > In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to > > > make differences

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Bill Nottingham
Chris Lumens (clum...@redhat.com) said: > > - downloads updates in parallel too > > Package updates? 1) Given that it's using yum, downloading multiple things in parallel would need to be fixed there. 2) If it means downloading packages in the background while it does other tasks, given that pa

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Christian, do you have any objections to enabling this? Nathaniel On 10/11/2010 01:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There is the file in the source tree called 'Banshee.Mpris.addin.xml'. > It contains plugin info (? sorry, I'm not familiar with c# projects at > all), where > defaultEnabled="f

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Bill Nottingham
Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said: > That is certainly a big part of the problem. Anaconda does a _ton_ of > crap that only very few users care about. And keeping all these minority > features from falling apart is leaving you no time to polish the user > experience for the large majority

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
There is the file in the source tree called 'Banshee.Mpris.addin.xml'. It contains plugin info (? sorry, I'm not familiar with c# projects at all), where defaultEnabled="false" And commit which brought that support tells the same "by default it's disabled" On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Na

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:48 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > > Useless waste of time. Just grab Ubuntu iso and see a stunning gap in > > both technology and usability between anaconda and their own > > installed. > > Does the Ubuntu installer support installing to iscsi? Multipath? > CCISS? Fully au

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
I don't actually see that as a build option in either banshee or banshee-community-extensions. Am I missing something? Nathaniel On 10/11/2010 12:38 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Agree if the maintainer enables the MPRISv2 support there. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Nathaniel McCallum >

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Well, seeing as I am one of the maintainers, I don't have a problem with that. Does anyone know if it is disabled for a reason? On 10/11/2010 12:38 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Agree if the maintainer enables the MPRISv2 support there. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Nathaniel McCallum > w

Re: RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Agree if the maintainer enables the MPRISv2 support there. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > I'd like to propose that we upgrade banshee (and > banshee-community-extensions) to 1.8.0 in F13.  I estimate that this > will close about half our open bugs.  Doing this will r

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Liang Suilong
I think anaconda is better than ubuntu installer. Ubuntu installer does not support LVM and RAID. I need these features. Anaconda does not easily support upgrading from internet. It is quite regretful. On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:14 AM, John Reiser wrote: > On 10/11/2010 03:41 AM, Richard W.M.

RFC: Upgrade Banshee to 1.8.0 in F13

2010-10-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
I'd like to propose that we upgrade banshee (and banshee-community-extensions) to 1.8.0 in F13. I estimate that this will close about half our open bugs. Doing this will require the following package upgrades in F13: * clutter-sharp - Upgrade (I'm pretty sure Banshee is the only user) * gio-shar

[perl-Padre] Fixed releases of BR and R mentioned by ppisar in 633737.

2010-10-11 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 8d8fba8c83d4a1095d99bb40e472ea92915c693a Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Oct 11 18:16:03 2010 +0200 Fixed releases of BR and R mentioned by ppisar in 633737. perl-Padre.spec | 30 +- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- diff --git

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-10-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 633737] perl-Padre-0.70 is available

2010-10-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633737 Bug 633737 depends on bug 636518, which changed state. Bug 636518 Summary: JSON-XS-2.3 bump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

[Bug 636518] JSON-XS-2.3 bump

2010-10-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636518 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread John Reiser
On 10/11/2010 03:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Some of the things [Ubuntu 10.10 installer] does which are IMHO better: > > - starts disk formatting / copying / installing in parallel >with asking user questions > > - downloads updates in parallel too What was the wall-clock duration

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Jon Masters
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks > ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing > 747. > Sure, both can accomplish the same task. Read: transporting people from > one airpor

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 05:53:20PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Does it support text based minimal install? debian-installer? Yes. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/11 Richard W.M. Jones : > > I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), > and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed.  It's > starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. > > Some of the things it does which are IMHO better: > >  - starts disk

[perl-Padre] Update to 0.72 Stable release, remove unnecessary BR and R.

2010-10-11 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit cee373141e324aa82d7ef3a4f8339c5080b1ecd7 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Mon Oct 11 17:42:27 2010 +0200 Update to 0.72 Stable release, remove unnecessary BR and R. .gitignore |1 + perl-Padre.spec | 27 ++- sources |2 +- 3 files c

File Padre-0.72.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano

2010-10-11 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Padre: d187654500fd819a70f8e82052d93db4 Padre-0.72.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), > and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed. It's > starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. > > Some of the things it does which are IMH

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Chris Lumens
> - downloads updates in parallel too Package updates? > - uses IP geolocation to guess the user's timezone and keyboard >settings (it's been 100% correct for me each time) We can do this, it's just never really been brought up. I'd like to rework a lot of the l10n stuff anyway, there jus

[Bug 633752] perl-Test-NeedsDisplay-1.07 is available

2010-10-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633752 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:37:15AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > On 10/11/2010 10:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to > >> illustrate the benefits. That way we can

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Adam Miller
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:48:44AM -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > > Useless waste of time. Just grab Ubuntu iso and see a stunning gap in > > both technology and usability between anaconda and their own > > installed. > > Does the Ubuntu installer support installing to iscsi? Multipath? > CCISS? F

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Chris Lumens
> Useless waste of time. Just grab Ubuntu iso and see a stunning gap in > both technology and usability between anaconda and their own > installed. Does the Ubuntu installer support installing to iscsi? Multipath? CCISS? Fully automated installation? Install over VNC? Installation from NFS, IS

Re: e4defrag repetable segfault (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/11 Eric Sandeen : > Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> e4defrag[23597]: segfault at 20 ip 0040232c sp >>> 7fff5bb0cd20 error 4 in e4defrag[40+5000] >> >> This is caused by the race between rm and e4defrag >> >> repeatable with attached >> canto_della_terra2.sh /mnt/tmp/test/ /mnt/

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:21:40PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Proving what? You can just imagine what a rebranded Ubuntu installer > that installed Fedora would look like. My point anyway is that we > could look at Ubuntu for ideas, because the first point of contact > with users is now

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to > > illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and > > overall value add before w

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Peter Jones
On 10/11/2010 10:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to >> illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and >> overall value add before we dive head fi

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2010/10/11 Josh Boyer : > I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to > illustrate the benefits.  That way we can evaluate feasibility and > overall value add before we dive head first into it across the whole > project. Useless waste of time. Just grab Ubuntu iso and s

Re: e4defrag repetable segfault (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-11 Thread Eric Sandeen
Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> e4defrag[23597]: segfault at 20 ip 0040232c sp >> 7fff5bb0cd20 error 4 in e4defrag[40+5000] > > This is caused by the race between rm and e4defrag > > repeatable with attached > canto_della_terra2.sh /mnt/tmp/test/ /mnt/tmp/reply.sh 50 > > Regards, > M

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Mike McGrath
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to > > illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and > > overall value add before we dive head f

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to > illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and > overall value add before we dive head first into it across the whole > project. Proving what?

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), > and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed.  It's > starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. > > Some of the things it does which are IMH

Re: forked-daapd to replace mt-daapd

2010-10-11 Thread Matej Cepl
Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:34:18 -0400: > Sorry, I think I was confusing daapd with another (system-critical) > component. You probably need to contact the maintainer of the original > mt-daapd and make sure they're on-board with switching to this new > forked version, as well as trying

Re: forked-daapd to replace mt-daapd

2010-10-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/2010 08:30 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:20:08 -0400: >> Being that it's a different upstream project now, you need to create a >> new package in Fedora. Once that's reviewed and included in the >> packageset,

Re: forked-daapd to replace mt-daapd

2010-10-11 Thread Matej Cepl
Stephen Gallagher, Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:20:08 -0400: > Being that it's a different upstream project now, you need to create a > new package in Fedora. Once that's reviewed and included in the > packageset, you should raise the question of default inclusion with > FESCo. Sure, no problem. Just I don

Re: forked-daapd to replace mt-daapd

2010-10-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/2010 08:12 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: > mt-daapd in Fedora (and EPEL) is nothing than life of pain (crashes, > sudden unexaplained stops, etc.) and its upstream is dead. > > There is now fork of it (http://blog.technologeek.org/category/hacks/ >

forked-daapd to replace mt-daapd

2010-10-11 Thread Matej Cepl
mt-daapd in Fedora (and EPEL) is nothing than life of pain (crashes, sudden unexaplained stops, etc.) and its upstream is dead. There is now fork of it (http://blog.technologeek.org/category/hacks/ forked-daapd) which shows some life and hope it could be acutally maintained by somebody who at le

Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed. It's starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. Some of the things it does which are IMHO better: - starts disk formatting / copying / installing in paralle

[License change] xfce4-cpugraph-plugin

2010-10-11 Thread Christoph Wickert
xfce4-cpugraph-plugin has a new upstream now. He fixed some bugs, bumped the version from 0.4.1 to 1.0.0 and changed the license from BSD to GPLv2+. Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

orphaning pychess

2010-10-11 Thread Thomas Spura
Hi list, I'm orphaning pychess, because I don't use it that often anymore and I don't have time to take care properly for all the bugs (and it needs some love...): 23 open bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Fedora&component=pychess&bug_status=NEW&bug_statu

[LICENSE CHANGE] gtk-murrine-engine changes license to dual-licensing LGPLv2.1 and LGPLv3

2010-10-11 Thread Martin Sourada
Hi all, as required by the licensing guidelines [1] I announce hereby a license change in gtk-murrine-engine in version 0.98.1 and newer to dual-licensing "LGPLv2.1 and LGPLv3" from GPLv2+. Since the change is to more permissive licenses, AFAIK nothing in fedora uses gtk-murrine-engine directly an

Re: orphan most of my packages

2010-10-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: >  I took uniconvertor it is needed for ImageMagick. jfyi: new version of it requires the sk1libs package which is absent (still?) in Fedora. Additionally I have some patches for older version. I could send them to you if

Re: orphan most of my packages

2010-10-11 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
I took uniconvertor it is needed for ImageMagick. 10.10.2010 18:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Hello, > > I have no more time to support the following packages in the Fedora. > > jack-audio-connection-kit -- The Jack Audio Connection Kit > > klamav -- Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop > > man-pag

Re: genkey Segmentation fault

2010-10-11 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 10/10/10 12:25 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >On 10/9/10 2:54 PM, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Philip Prindeville >>wrote: >>> Any suggestions? >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=genkey >> >> Regards, >> François > So... despite being