Chen Lei wrote:
> How about qt-doc? Currently, it bundles src/qch/html docs, the src
> image files are completely useless and duplicate with files in html
> directory. The content of the qch and html docs is identical, since
> assistant_adp is dropped by qt 4.7, I suggest to split html docs into
>
2010/8/9 Kevin Kofler :
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Depending on the technologies and applications involved I could see
>> duplication being okay when one format is meant for people utilizing
>> less /usr/share/doc/foo/* vs running /usr/bin/documentationviewer or
>> /usr/bin/programmer-ide
>
> Tha
I wrote:
> As for the Internet connection: I've just downloaded root-doc in 4
> minutes, at 2.5 megaBYTES per second. And that's in Vienna, Austria. There
> are places with even faster Internet connections.
PS: That's my HOME connection. You don't want to know how fast I could
download that file
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Depending on the technologies and applications involved I could see
> duplication being okay when one format is meant for people utilizing
> less /usr/share/doc/foo/* vs running /usr/bin/documentationviewer or
> /usr/bin/programmer-ide
That's the case for the KDE stuff: p
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:39:44PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I have filed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992
Imho the bug report s
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Robert Scheck wrote, at 08/09/2010 04:39 AM +9:00:
>> Hi,
>> as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>>
>> I have filed:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I no longer use cvs2cl, so I've orphaned it in package database. Go grab
> it if you want it.
I picked it up, in Fedora only. I'm not interested in EPEL, so if anybody
wants it in EPEL, feel free to grab it there and I'll also grant you
comaintainership in Fedora if you ap
Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Waiting for Devhelp to be downgraded to 2.31.x after Fedora 14 Alpha
> is released.
This report is about Rawhide (now targeting F15+), not the F14 branch.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
Robert Scheck wrote, at 08/09/2010 04:39 AM +9:00:
> Hi,
> as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> I have filed:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992
>
> Does somebody know how to contact D
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 22:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the proper known_hosts entry,
> one has to download https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ssh_known_hosts btw.
I'm very glad to see that Fedora provides such a list. I just installed
it on my computer (afte
Hi,
as per non-responsive maintainer policy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I have filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992
Does somebody know how to contact Deji Akingunola? I've been unsuccessful
via e-mail and Red Hat Bugzi
On 08/08/10 20:19, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> My advice: stop doing that.
Taken
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> I've taken a look at the root source rpm, and it looks like root-doc is
> generated by root itself *after* root has been completely built (rather
> than as part of root's build process).
>
> I've opened a bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621812
> suggesting
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> While in the general case, I would agree with you, in this specific
> case, I think it's worth building on the client. 687MB is a very large
> download, over 90 minutes on a 1mbit/s link, and 45 minutes on a 2mbit/s
> link. Because of the large size and number of files, i
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 19:47 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 08/08/10 19:28, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> >> By that I mean the maintainer\Co-Maintainer\Good Citizen
> >> retelling the same fix\workaround posted earlier in the bug.
> >> To either enable\updates-testing or do xyz.
> >> Because the bug
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> As I said in the bug report, I don't think building docs client side
> is the right way to go at all. In the general case this would require
> end users to install extra tools to build the docs, and defeats the
> purpose of a package managed system such as Fedora.
+1
I
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 20:01 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> > Users should already be reading the existing information, because abrt
> > provides the link after it makes its changes (adding the user to CC and
> > adding a comment with the "how to reproduce"
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Users should already be reading the existing information, because abrt
> provides the link after it makes its changes (adding the user to CC and
> adding a comment with the "how to reproduce" text, if it was nonempty).
> The proposal would just be to rev
On 08/08/10 19:28, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> By that I mean the maintainer\Co-Maintainer\Good Citizen
>> retelling the same fix\workaround posted earlier in the bug.
>> To either enable\updates-testing or do xyz.
>> Because the bug report hasn't been read by the "added to" person.
>
> As I said, I
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:29 -0500, Steve Bonneville wrote:
> i.g...@comcast.net wrote:
> > Ideally (from this perspective), the host would validate the response
> > itself.
>
> Exactly, if sshd is sufficiently paranoid it should make a query with
> CD set in the request and do all the validation
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 09:24 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 08/08/10 03:25, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Would it be any benefit to the maintainers\bugzappers.
> >> If abrt opened the existing link, before it would report?
> >
> > And then what? Encourage the user not to add a comment unless
Hi,
When I try to fire up s-c-samba, I'm getting the following reported back
Authorization error
The authorization needed for 'org.fedoraproject.config.samba.configure'
could not be obtained. The application will exit now.
Is anyone else seeing this? I need to set up the samba share for my main
On 8 August 2010 09:28, Chen Lei wrote:
> I can help to review mysql-connector-c and Silvercity, howerver we may
> need a approve from FESCo for bundling scintilla in silvercity.
Scintilla is already bundled in with other apps in Fedora,
unfortunately. For example, geany bundles a slightly modifi
Compose started at Sun Aug 8 13:15:23 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0
CGAL-3.6.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
LuxRender-0
Le 08/08/2010 10:28, Chen Lei a écrit :
> I can help to review mysql-connector-c
Submit for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/622272
+
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le 08/08/2010 10:28, Chen Lei a écrit :
> I can help to review mysql-connector-c and Silvercity, howerver we may
> need a approve from FESCo for bundling scintilla in silvercity.
I don't plan to package silvercity,
but rather keep both (scintilla + silvercity) bundled in MW.
+
--
devel mailing
I'm developing a pywebkitgtk application, so I'm interested too
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Sun Aug 8 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
Mayavi-3.3.0-1.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc1
Thank you, Chen Lei and Remi.
I found MySQL Workbench for Linux has an bug. The bug seems to come from
scintilla. I typed some CJK words in SQL Editor of MySQL Workbench. It would
show the garbled codes and incorrect words. The bug does not appears on
Fedora, but also on any other Linux distros, i
2010/8/8 Remi Collet :
> Le 07/08/2010 19:17, Liang Suilong a écrit :
>
>> The first one, as we know, mysql-gui-tools has retired since Fedora 13
>> because of many bugs. MySQL Workbench will take the place of
>> mysql-gui-tools. Now MySQL Workbench 5.2.26 GA released. Could review
>> request conti
On 08/08/10 03:25, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>>
>> Would it be any benefit to the maintainers\bugzappers.
>> If abrt opened the existing link, before it would report?
>
> And then what? Encourage the user not to add a comment unless they have
> new information? If that is the proposal, I am in favor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/10 02:33 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> You need to add it as CC in your initial "CVS" request. If you forgot to
> do so, contact the person who processed this CVS request, apologize for
> the inconvenience, and ask them to fix it.
>
> Regards,
32 matches
Mail list logo
