as #648
-Original Message-
From: Ard Biesheuvel
Sent: 2020年5月22日 21:27
To: Leif Lindholm ; Laszlo Ersek
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; g...@suse.com; Gao, Liming
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] ArmPkg/CompilerIntrinsicsLib: provide
atomics intrinsics
On 5/22/20 12:54 PM, Leif
Sent: 2020年5月22日 21:27
To: Leif Lindholm ; Laszlo Ersek
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; g...@suse.com; Gao, Liming
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] ArmPkg/CompilerIntrinsicsLib: provide
atomics intrinsics
On 5/22/20 12:54 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 22:22:58 +0200, Las
: 2020年5月29日 4:09
To: Gao, Liming ; Leif Lindholm ; Gary
Lin ; af...@apple.com; Kinney, Michael D
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; ard.biesheu...@arm.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] ArmPkg/CompilerIntrinsicsLib: provide
atomics intrinsics
On 05/28/20 17:48, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Leif:
> B
lm
>> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 5:49 PM
>> To: Gary Lin
>> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; ard.biesheu...@arm.com; ler...@redhat.com; Gao,
>> Liming
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] ArmPkg/CompilerIntrinsicsLib: provide
>> atomics intrinsics
>>
>&g
ndholm
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 5:49 PM
> To: Gary Lin
> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; ard.biesheu...@arm.com; ler...@redhat.com; Gao,
> Liming
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] ArmPkg/CompilerIntrinsicsLib: provide
> atomics intrinsics
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:36:33 +0800, Gary Lin wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:44:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
> > unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
> > new intrinsics, and eve
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:44:48PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
> unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
> new intrinsics, and even though it would be possible to work around this
> by specifyin
On 05/22/20 15:27, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 5/22/20 12:54 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 22:22:58 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 05/21/20 16:16, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>>
OK, then I would vote *for* merging the patch regardless. We know how
long some toolchain ver
On 5/22/20 12:54 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 22:22:58 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 05/21/20 16:16, Leif Lindholm wrote:
OK, then I would vote *for* merging the patch regardless. We know how
long some toolchain versions can stick around simply because they were
mentioned i
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 22:22:58 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 05/21/20 16:16, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> > OK, then I would vote *for* merging the patch regardless. We know how
> > long some toolchain versions can stick around simply because they were
> > mentioned in some blog post somewhere tha
On 5/21/20 10:22 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 05/21/20 16:16, Leif Lindholm wrote:
OK, then I would vote *for* merging the patch regardless. We know how
long some toolchain versions can stick around simply because they were
mentioned in some blog post somewhere that ended up high in search
rankin
On 05/21/20 16:16, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> OK, then I would vote *for* merging the patch regardless. We know how
> long some toolchain versions can stick around simply because they were
> mentioned in some blog post somewhere that ended up high in search
> rankings.
>
> Once gcc 10.2 is released (
On 5/21/20 7:02 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/21/20 6:59 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 5/21/20 6:45 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/21/20 6:40 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via groups.io wrote:
On 5/20/20 2:37 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Ard,
On 5/20/20 1:44 PM, Ard Biesheuvel w
On 5/21/20 6:59 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 5/21/20 6:45 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/21/20 6:40 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via groups.io wrote:
On 5/20/20 2:37 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Ard,
On 5/20/20 1:44 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit ca
On 5/21/20 6:45 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 5/21/20 6:40 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via groups.io wrote:
On 5/20/20 2:37 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Ard,
On 5/20/20 1:44 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
unless -mno-outl
On 5/21/20 6:40 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via groups.io wrote:
On 5/20/20 2:37 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Ard,
On 5/20/20 1:44 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10
On 5/20/20 2:37 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Ard,
On 5/20/20 1:44 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
new intrinsics, and even though it would be possible
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 15:31:44 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > That does mean you would need GCC 10.2 at least, or you get the error,
> > > unless we merge this patch as well. That would mean the intrinsics are
> > > never
> > > used in practice, but using a compiler that does use them will n
On 5/21/20 3:16 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 14:58:56 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm
Thanks!
Apparently, GCC 10 is getting fixed so that we can set a #pragma in
MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h, and be done with it.
That does mean you would
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 14:58:56 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> Apparently, GCC 10 is getting fixed so that we can set a #pragma in
> MdePkg/Include/AArch64/ProcessorBind.h, and be done with it.
>
> That does mean you would need GCC 10.2 at least
On 5/21/20 1:23 PM, Leif Lindholm via groups.io wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 13:44:48 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
new intrinsics, and even though it wo
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 13:44:48 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
> unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
> new intrinsics, and even though it would be possible to work around this
> by specifying
On 05/20/20 13:44, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
> unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
> new intrinsics, and even though it would be possible to work around this
> by specifying the command line opti
Hi Ard,
On 5/20/20 1:44 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
new intrinsics, and even though it would be possible to work around this
by specifying the command line
Gary reports the GCC 10 will emit calls to atomics intrinsics routines
unless -mno-outline-atomics is specified. This means GCC-10 introduces
new intrinsics, and even though it would be possible to work around this
by specifying the command line option, this would require a new GCC10
toolchain prof
25 matches
Mail list logo
