On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:18:32 +0200, Ms2ger wrote:
> On the plus side, it could make it easier to share code between
> thunderbird and the b2g email code.
Not really since the b2g email app is on github and doesn't share code
with thunderbird for now.
Fabrice
_
org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
>
>
>
> ___
> firefox-dev mailing list
> firefox-...@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev
>
--
Fabrice Desré
b2g team
Mozilla Corporation
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
ople from various corners of the platform
that helped us so far. I guess I'll have to bribe you now!
Feel free to reach out to me if you need any more details on the subject,
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
___
d
patches that couldn't land because of Firefox OS tests
> failing in ways the author couldn't figure out? I'm thinking of
> examples such as bug 1043562. Can we land such patches now?
Yes.
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
__
have no objections to remove this particular support.
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
ds. You're right that for
apis that are turned on by prefs in tests that's a gray area. That will
be on the module owners to decide what to do.
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.m
it's doable (especially not whether a gecko engineer
can do it) but if it's a reasonable tool for others to use. Gecko is not
one unfortunately.
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
#x27;m puzzled - that seems like major
shortsightedness coming from a 'platform' team. If I misunderstood, my
apologies.
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
1257127 is tracking the fix.
thanks,
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1291291 which is up for grabs.
--
Fabrice Desré
Connected Devices
Mozilla Corporation
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:31:30 -0700, Ben Adida wrote:
>> 3. I recall talking with Fabrice that this was a non-trivial amount of
>> work for fixing this,
>
> I'm having trouble seeing how that is. We can stage the feature in a
> couple of ways, first by letting marketplace packaged apps claim an
>
Hi Henri,
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:12:05 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> How do I get the language code for the currently active UI language pack
> from within Gecko C++ code in a way that works across desktop, Android,
> B2G and Metro?
A c++ version of could work:
let chrome = Cc["@mozilla.org/chr
In the download api we are working on for b2g, a download event in webidl
looks like:
[Constructor(DOMString type, optional DownloadEventInit eventInitDict)]
interface DownloadEvent : Event
{
readonly attribute DOMDownload? download;
};
dictionary DownloadEventInit : EventInit
{
DOMDownload
d implementation of
the certified apps csp is still there though, and will be hard to beat
perf wise. I'm not sure how many resources the app is loading at
startup, but the csp cost is mostly linear with the resource number and
that adds up.
Fabrice
--
On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 14:37:40 -0700, Florian Bender wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. August 2014 18:11:23 UTC+2 schrieb Wesley Johnston:
>> Link to standard: There is no public standard in place for these
>> meta-tags and none in progress either.
>
> Have you seen https://github.com/whatwg/meta-theme-color
On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:42:49 +0100, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 28/07/14 17:12, Dale Harvey wrote:
>> We specifically chose a User Agent to something compatible with our
>> Android release to get more compatible websites, despite the "standard"
>> way would be to not do browser sniffing.
>
> I'm
n fix (or can find someone to fix) code that is in mozilla-central. But
> code that is outside of that tree will be problematic. Namely, Gaia and
> addons.
> Can someone own updating Gaia JS to be ES6-compliant? It is unclear to me what
> should be done about addons.
Gaia doesn't use
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:04:28 -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2014-09-15, 5:47 AM, Kilik kuo wrote:
>> One more thing,
>>
>> We would like to support URL of app scheme for requesting session.
>> And the scope will be as below.
>> - Certified and Privileged with declaration of origin apps are
>> su
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:05:46 +0800, Philip Chee wrote:
> On 31/01/2015 14:03, Vladan Djeric wrote:
>> We do need a performant key-value store implementation. This has been
>> discussed before and various people have come up with proposals (myself
>> included), but no one has had the time & focus t
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:30:00 -0400, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> If I do not find a suitable owner in the next two weeks, I intend to
> remove the XULRunner code from the mozilla-central repository on
> 14-August.
Two weeks during summer time seems a bit short. You may not get
interested people th
In Bug 778668 I'm making changes to the nsIAlertsService that impacts
code in m-c and c-c.
What's the best way coordinate these landings while not breaking c-c?
My m-c patch will do m-i -> m-c -> c-c, but I have no idea which revision
of m-c is picked up by c-c and when.
Fabrice
__
21 matches
Mail list logo
