On 01/25/2016 09:30 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > For example, for a long time b2g partners held back our minimum > supported gcc. Now that there are no such partner requirements, perhaps > we can consider bumping up the minimum to gcc 4.8? (bug 1175546)
We moved to 4.8 on b2g a year ago: see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1056337 Who's behind? :P > Another example, last year because of 2.5 release pressure where people > were planning on using service workers in gaia app, we had to add a huge > hack for "supporting" app:// URIs for service worker interception. The > last time that this code bit me was earlier this morning. It would be > nice if I can remove this broken code now instead of worrying about how > to keep supporting it going forward (this makes fixing bug 1222008 more > complicated than it needs to be.) I have no objections to remove this particular support. -- Fabrice Desré Connected Devices Mozilla Corporation _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
