On 02/08/2012 06:32 AM, Alex Keybl wrote:
Can you clarify this? It sounds like changes would land on aurora *first*, and
then be forward-ported to mozilla-central. Which, IMO, goes against the basic
principles of how our branches work.
Only in the very rare instance where B2G v2 (Gecko change
On 8/2/2012 12:07 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Which brings me to another question: how long do you expect to keep B2G
on Gecko 17? (eg. will v2 be off 17 or off the next ESR or off something
else still?) Fragmentation on eg. Android is well-documented, what's the
plan in that department?
Fragme
On 01/08/2012 22:47, Alex Keybl wrote:
On 10/7, we'll similarly move active B2G v1 platform development to
mozilla-beta, and on 11/19 work will move to the mozilla-esr17 branch. A
notice referencing this dev.platform post will be sent to the enterprise
list shortly for comment, as some of the ESR
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> On 8/2/2012 12:07 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
>
>> Which brings me to another question: how long do you expect to keep B2G
>> on Gecko 17? (eg. will v2 be off 17 or off the next ESR or off something
>> else still?) Fragmentation on eg. Android i
Zack Weinberg a écrit :
Does MS have any plan to support the x32 memory model? It needs kernel
as well as compiler support.
Could a shim layer possibly bring x32 to a x64 process under Windows ?
Or else have most of the code handle memory as "offset inside a bucket",
and reduce most pointer
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
intent with our Tablet token.
Dao suggests it would be nice to get cross-browser consistency here.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
According to the MDN here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Observer_Notifications#HTTP_requests
HTTP-ON-EXAMINE-MERGED-RESPONSE is:
called *instead* of http-on-examine-response when a response will be
read partially from cache, and partially from the network (HTTP 206 or
304 response). Headers ar
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:32:30PM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>
> IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
> intent with our Tablet token.
>
> Dao suggests it would be nice to get
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>
> IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps
> in
> intent with our Tablet token.
>
> Dao suggests it would be nice to get cross-browser consistency here.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
On Thursday, August 2, 2012 7:09:43 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>
> >
>
> > IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps
>
> > in
>
> > intent with our Tablet token.
>
> >
>
> >
On 07/28/2012 05:19 PM, thus spoke Jonas Sicking:
> When are we doing PRUint32? ;-)
+1!
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Maybe we should take a different approach to the problem...
Have an all-developer "fix orange tests" day where developers work ONLY
on fixing random oranges (maybe once you've successfully fixed 1 or 2
random oranges, you can go back to your other work?)
Not meant as a criticism, but rather jus
On 08/02/2012 09:32 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>
> IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
> intent with our Tablet token.
>
> Dao suggests it would be nice to get cross-browser cons
I want to just kick a parenthesis here. This thread called my
attention because yesterday I just went through the passage
"Kinect’s remarkable gestural interface, for example, makes clear that
Microsoft no longer insists its customers master multimedia,
multiplayer complexity. Microsoft instead as
On Thursday, August 2, 2012 6:32:30 AM UTC-7, Gervase Markham wrote:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>
> IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
> intent with our Tablet token.
>
> Dao suggests it would be nice to
For a discussion of current B2G test automation status and future plans,
see this blog post:
http://jagriffin.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/mozilla-a-team-b2g-test-automation-update/
Jonathan
On 8/1/2012 9:30 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/1/12 5:47 PM, Alex Keybl wrote:
any desktop/mobile change
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:54 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, August 2, 2012 6:32:30 AM UTC-7, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>>
>> IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
>> intent with our Table
On 8/2/2012 3:19 PM, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote:
According to the MDN here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Observer_Notifications#HTTP_requests
HTTP-ON-EXAMINE-MERGED-RESPONSE is:
called *instead* of http-on-examine-response when a response will be
read partially from cache, and partially from th
On 8/2/12 8:59 AM, Mark Finkle wrote:
1. Let's not chase every browser's UA change. UAs _suck_ and I'd rather
leave ours alone now that we fought through the debate.
<3
UA changes just seem to be enormous time sinks relative to their value.
I'd also prefer to see us changing it less, with th
Hi all,
For the past couple of weeks these builds have been failing. Because
they don't show up TBPL, there is little visibility into them, but these
*are* shipping products and need to be fixed:
Mac fails to successfully run configure:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779907
Windows f
On 8/1/12 2:47 PM, Alex Keybl wrote:
... and on 11/19 work will move to the mozilla-esr17 branch.
I don't really understand this, perhaps I am missing something?
ESR and a v1.0 product seem inherently at odds. EG, I would assume that
B2G will be making substantial and even high-risk changes r
On 8/2/12 1:44 AM, Andreas Gal wrote:
Reporting of the results and integration is very lacking, and until those
pieces fall into place (e.g. try integration), the developer experience is
going to suck a lot if we enforce the rule below (backout).
That's the concern, yes.
Basically, if we're
The ESR branch's purpose previously was to support enterprise deployments. Now
that we are supporting both desktop deployments and B2G v1 on that branch,
security/stability changes will not be the only fixes taken. There may be
B2G-specific changes and minor cross-platform changes in support of
Your expectation that we'll still be taking major cross-platform changes to
Gecko that late in the 17 cycle does not line up with the planning being done
in the B2G dev team. If at any point it becomes clear that we need to pull B2G
v1's Gecko off the trains for the sake of other products' qualI
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>
> IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
> intent with our Tablet token.
Opera and, IIRC, the RIM PlayBook browser say "Tabl
Hi, all.
I just tested view port meta tag on various devices and browsers. In
chrome, opera and default browser for Android (4 at Galaxy Nexus) and on
Blackberry 10 webkit all is good, when we pass in content attribute
"width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=no" both browsers
scales
That's right! We're finally ready to throw the switch! Tomorrow (that is,
Friday, August 3, 2012) we intend to switch from the current MindTouch-based
wiki to our new Kuma platform for the Mozilla Developer Network wiki. The
changeover should happen at about 10:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time.
At t
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:22:43 -0500, Scott Johnson wrote:
> Maybe we should take a different approach to the problem...
>
> Have an all-developer "fix orange tests" day where developers work ONLY
> on fixing random oranges (maybe once you've successfully fixed 1 or 2
> random oranges, you can go
On Friday, 3 August 2012 02:30:03 UTC+1, Philip Chee wrote:
> If it's random, how do you know if you've actually fixed it without
> having to waste your time watching the tree for a week?
http://brasstacks.mozilla.com/orangefactor/
___
dev-platform mail
Hi,
The #1 problem for many people with the current MDN wiki was that it didn't
offer mediawiki-compatible markup editing. It would be great to be able to
use right away one's familiarity with mediawiki markup (which is what most
people know), and of course being able to copy and paste contents to
30 matches
Mail list logo
