Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-26 Thread Joe Drew
In case people are wondering (like I was), says: > Client versions between 2.1 and 2.4.2 inclusive are affected. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/lis

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-25 Thread Jeff Hammel
On 02/21/2013 05:41 AM, Justin Lebar wrote: Can guidance be provided as to where to get such things for commonly-run versions of Linux? It's also easy to install hg using pip or easy_install. You can get either of these tools using your distro's package manager. (easy_install is usually called

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Gregory Szorc
This thread is reminding me why we have an in-tree system bootstrapper tool (/python/mozboot) to effortlessly configure an optimal development environment. If running that does not install what you need, please file a Core :: Build Config bug and consider contributing a patch to make it do what

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Jed Davis
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:36:15AM +, Gervase Markham wrote: > The Mercurial download page: > http://mercurial.selenic.com/downloads/ > offers 2.5.1 for Mac and Windows, but no Linux packages. Can guidance be > provided as to where to get such things for commonly-run versions of Linux? Debian

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Milan Sreckovic
This also worked on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Milan On 2013-02-21, at 11:08 AM, Dave Hylands wrote: > > I'm running 64-bit Linux Mint 14, which is based on Ubuntu 12.10. I did the > following: > > sudo apt-get install python-setuptools python-dev build-essential > sudo easy_install -U mercurial > >

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Mike Habicher
Hi Dave, On 13-02-21 11:08 AM, Dave Hylands wrote: Hey Mike, I'm running 64-bit Linux Mint 14, which is based on Ubuntu 12.10. I did the following: sudo apt-get install python-setuptools python-dev build-essential sudo easy_install -U mercurial and it downloaded and installed 2.5.1 Thanks.

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Dave Hylands
Hey Mike, - Original Message - > From: "Mike Habicher" > To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:21:09 AM > Subject: Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1 > > On 13-02-21 08:41 AM, Justin Lebar wrote: > >>

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:21:09AM -0500, Mike Habicher wrote: > On 13-02-21 08:41 AM, Justin Lebar wrote: > >>Can guidance be > >>provided as to where to get such things for commonly-run versions of Linux? > >It's also easy to install hg using pip or easy_install. You can get > >either of these t

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Mike Habicher
On 13-02-21 08:41 AM, Justin Lebar wrote: Can guidance be provided as to where to get such things for commonly-run versions of Linux? It's also easy to install hg using pip or easy_install. You can get either of these tools using your distro's package manager. (easy_install is usually called py

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Gervase Markham
On 21/02/13 13:41, Justin Lebar wrote: > that.) I think pip is the preferred method these days. The magic incantation for me was: sudo pip install mercurial --upgrade This gave me version 2.5.1. Gerv ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.m

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Justin Lebar
> Can guidance be > provided as to where to get such things for commonly-run versions of Linux? It's also easy to install hg using pip or easy_install. You can get either of these tools using your distro's package manager. (easy_install is usually called python-setuptools or something like that.)

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Bob Clary
On 02/21/2013 03:36 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: The Mercurial download page: http://mercurial.selenic.com/downloads/ offers 2.5.1 for Mac and Windows, but no Linux packages. Can guidance be provided as to where to get such things for commonly-run versions of Linux? On Fedora 18 I just yum erase

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Pascal Chevrel
Le 21/02/2013 12:36, Gervase Markham a écrit : On 20/02/13 16:06, Justin Lebar wrote: The client bug that's fixed with the new version of hg is slowly and irreversibly ruining our blame, so I don't think we should wait before upgrading clients. The Mercurial download page: http://mercurial.sel

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-21 Thread Gervase Markham
On 20/02/13 16:06, Justin Lebar wrote: > The client bug that's fixed with the new version of hg is slowly and > irreversibly ruining our blame, so I don't think we should wait before > upgrading clients. The Mercurial download page: http://mercurial.selenic.com/downloads/ offers 2.5.1 for Mac and

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-20 Thread Justin Lebar
> Don't we need to update our servers first due to phases? But either way, > yes, this should be a bigger priority. The client bug that's fixed with the new version of hg is slowly and irreversibly ruining our blame, so I don't think we should wait before upgrading clients. Based on experience, b

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-20 Thread Paul Adenot
On 02/20/2013 08:56 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: > On 2/20/2013 2:40 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: >> Guess we should plan a mozillabuild release. >> >> - Kyle > > Don't we need to update our servers first due to phases? But either way, > yes, this should be a bigger priority. Either update the servers to

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-20 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: > > I have no idea what phases are. A sort of useful, sort of annoying Mercurial feature. Run |hg help phase| in a sufficiently recent version for details. Nick ps: when you update to a version that supports phases, the first time you use the

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-20 Thread Ryan VanderMeulen
On 2/20/2013 2:40 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: Guess we should plan a mozillabuild release. - Kyle Don't we need to update our servers first due to phases? But either way, yes, this should be a bigger priority. -Ryan ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-plat

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-20 Thread Kyle Huey
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: > On 2/20/2013 2:40 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: > >> Guess we should plan a mozillabuild release. >> > > Don't we need to update our servers first due to phases? But either way, > yes, this should be a bigger priority. I have no idea what phase

Re: Please upgrade to at least Mercurial 2.5.1

2013-02-19 Thread Kyle Huey
Guess we should plan a mozillabuild release. - Kyle On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Jonathan Watt wrote: > Earlier today I noticed that hg annotate was messed up on m-c for > nsSVGFilters.cpp. Turns out this was due to a bug that has been fixed in > Mercurial 2.5. Please update to version 2.5