Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #14

2017-06-26 19:40 GMT+02:00 Ehsan Akhgari : > On 06/26/2017 09:52 AM, Armen Zambrano Gasparnian wrote: >> >> On Friday, 23 June 2017 10:05:42 UTC-4, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Chris Peterson >>> wrote: >>> On 6/23/17 12:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #14

On 06/26/2017 09:52 AM, Armen Zambrano Gasparnian wrote: On Friday, 23 June 2017 10:05:42 UTC-4, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Chris Peterson wrote: On 6/23/17 12:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: But to speak of a more direct measurement of performance, let's look at our

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #14

On Friday, 23 June 2017 10:05:42 UTC-4, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Chris Peterson > wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/23/17 12:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > > > > But to speak of a more direct measurement of performance, let's look at > > our progress on Speedometer V2 > > <

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #14

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Chris Peterson wrote: > > > On 6/23/17 12:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > > But to speak of a more direct measurement of performance, let's look at > our progress on Speedometer V2 > . > Toda

Re: Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #14

On 6/23/17 12:17 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: But to speak of a more direct measurement of performance, let's look at our progress on Speedometer V2 . Today, I measured our progress so far on this benchmark by comparing

Quantum Flow Engineering Newsletter #14

Hi everyone, We have about 13 more weeks before the train of Firefox 57 leaves the station. Next week many of you will be at the upcoming work week, so I thought it may be a good time to have some retrospection over our progress so far, just so that you can get a good sense of how to extrapolate