Now instead we will get to try to phrase code in a way that
clang-format will preserve readably?
I should think "it doesn't always produce nice formatting, but it's at
least consistent" sounds like a major warning sign, particularly given
that we definitely have tricky code for which we have made
Le 28/09/2017 à 23:21, Randell Jesup a écrit :
>> On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 10:15:05 AM UTC+2, Chris Pearce wrote:
>> Oh d'oh! Looks like I replied to an old thread, and the plan now is in fact
>> to clang-format the entire tree after 57. Sweet as!
> Where did you find that? Was this plan
>On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 10:15:05 AM UTC+2, Chris Pearce wrote:
>Oh d'oh! Looks like I replied to an old thread, and the plan now is in fact
>to clang-format the entire tree after 57. Sweet as!
Where did you find that? Was this plan communicated? It's not in this
thread... (which star
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 10:15:05 AM UTC+2, Chris Pearce wrote:
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 at 3:29:48 AM UTC+2, Anthony Jones wrote:
> > Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach
> > clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary
> > bu
On Friday, May 23, 2014 at 3:29:48 AM UTC+2, Anthony Jones wrote:
> Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach
> clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary
> but it is functional enough to give it a try. I have not put the effort
> into upstr
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> And then you end up with something like:
>
> class Foo {
> Type MethodA() { do_something(); }
> Type MethodB()
> {
> do_something_that_happens_to_be_long_enough_not_to_fit_on_the_same_line();
> }
> Type MethodC() { do_something_el
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Sylvestre Ledru
wrote:
>> clang-format messes up really badly many macros.
>> For example nsElementTable.cpp becomes unreadable.
>
> Yeah, for this kind of structure & presentation layout, we should just
ignore the formatting on these.
>
> It is hard for reformatt
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 02:49:56PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 26/09/2017 à 14:33, smaug a écrit :
> > On 05/23/2014 04:29 AM, Anthony Jones wrote:
> >> Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach
> >> clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very t
Le 26/09/2017 à 14:33, smaug a écrit :
> On 05/23/2014 04:29 AM, Anthony Jones wrote:
>> Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach
>> clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary
>> but it is functional enough to give it a try. I have not put
On 05/23/2014 04:29 AM, Anthony Jones wrote:
Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach
clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary
but it is functional enough to give it a try. I have not put the effort
into upstreaming my changes. Dependin
On 22/05/2014 18:29, Anthony Jones wrote:
> Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach
> clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary
> but it is functional enough to give it a try. I have not put the effort
> into upstreaming my changes. Depen
I tried using clang-format on entire files and I noticed two things
(there might be others, I didn't look too closely):
1) When it reformats comments to fit in the line length, it just inserts
linebreaks rather than rewrapping the text. So you end
up
with text like this, where the last couple
Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach
clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary
but it is functional enough to give it a try. I have not put the effort
into upstreaming my changes. Depending on the feedback I receive I will
either:
* F
13 matches
Mail list logo
