Re: ARIA membership and role="password"

2016-06-21 Thread Marco Zehe
An update to this: I just re-joined the ARIA-WG on Mozilla's behalf. Marco 2016-06-02 17:47 GMT+02:00 David Bolter : > Hi Johnathan, > > Our lack of direct W3C ARIA involvement recently is mainly due to > time/resource constraints and we have influence via proxy. > > I think ARIA is best scoped

Re: ARIA membership and role="password"

2016-06-02 Thread David Bolter
Hi Johnathan, Our lack of direct W3C ARIA involvement recently is mainly due to time/resource constraints and we have influence via proxy. I think ARIA is best scoped as passive semantics used to describe the reality of how web developers (ab)use HTML. It is not unreasonable to argue that ARIA, b

Re: ARIA membership and role="password"

2016-06-02 Thread Alexander Surkov
Hi, Jonathan. As far as I can tell, no one in Mozilla is super active in ARIA nowadays; I personally (among others I think) skim through ARIA email threads and provide occasional feedback on feature by feature basis. One of reasons keeping me off I think is I'm worried about direction taken in AR

ARIA membership and role="password"

2016-06-02 Thread Jonathan Kingston
Hey, So I was just informed that Mozilla isn't a member of the ARIA working group which shocked me, we have however had a hand in the spec over the years (I have cc'd those mentioned). I notice over the years some disappointment with the spec as it being a separate module to semantics in HTML i