--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
I want to point out that the bug in question had 48 Mozillians CC'ed on it,
so any comments on the bug which are extraneous to the subject of the bug
add noise to the signal.
Comments are a place to make a case for a fix, but not indulging in a
jeremiad if a decision is made not to fix.
-- Emma
I wrote the following in bug 1270308 comment 14, and thought it might be
worth mentioning/discussing here. Not a new observation, of course, but
perhaps worth thinking about. I should re-emphasize the effort that
goes into making clean shutdown work without intermittent is a LOT of
work for a lot
On 05/09/2016 04:59 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
But I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't take anymore long till Mozilla is on the
ground...
It seems a bit odd that you're using the "you will lose marketshare"
argument in favour of your demands, but in the content process bug your
demands basica
K, I wait till Mozilla hit the bottom because marking my opinions to problems
as "Offtopic" and removing my rights because I get p*ssed that my thinking
about it is "off topic" is getting to much for me!
But I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't take anymore long till Mozilla is on the
ground...
Se
On 5/9/2016 2:23 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
Hi!
Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS
Project!
The same mistake made Oracle with OpenOffice!
Now the project is almost death!
Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots!
Would be nice, if some peo
Below is a highlight of all work the build peers have done in the last 2
weeks as part of their work to modernise the build infrastructure.
Since the last report[1] a large number of improvements have landed in
Mozilla Central.
We have been experimenting with making a global cache available to al
On Monday 2016-05-09 11:42 -0700, Jet Villegas wrote:
> Is this a follow-up, or are we prevented from parsing extended HTML color
> attributes by some other invariant?
Colors in HTML use a parsing algorithm that basically accepts all
garbage, and people depend on that, so we're probably unable to
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2016 20:54:44 UTC+2 schrieb Kyle Huey:
> Because you are *still* (as of 10 minutes ago) removing the off-topic
> labels that were applied to clearly off-topic comments I have temporarily
> removed your editbugs permissions.
>
> - Kyle
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2016 20:33:11 UTC+2 schrieb Andrew McCreight:
> Thank you for opening a discussion thread rather than posting more in the
> bug.
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go fo
Same belongs to bug 1219672!
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1219672
If Mozilla still don't know that I sometimes give a rant, if thing go really
wrong, but on the other side my rants were the reasons in the last 2,5 years,
that Firfox was getting on Windows much better again, then
Because you are *still* (as of 10 minutes ago) removing the off-topic
labels that were applied to clearly off-topic comments I have temporarily
removed your editbugs permissions.
- Kyle
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer <
tobias.bese...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ignoring
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:35 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> I just landed a patch to implement the #rgba and #rrggbbaa syntax
> for colors in CSS,
>
Nice!
> It affects only colors specified in CSS, and not those specified in
> HTML attributes.
>
> Is this a follow-up, or are we prevented from par
Thank you for opening a discussion thread rather than posting more in the
bug.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer <
tobias.bese...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a
> OSS Project!
> The same mistake made Orac
On 2016-05-09 2:23 PM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots!
Would be nice, if some people think about it!
While reasonable people can disagree about policy decisions, Bugzilla
has never been the right place to air those disagreements.
- mhoye
__
Hi!
Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a OSS
Project!
The same mistake made Oracle with OpenOffice!
Now the project is almost death!
Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots!
Would be nice, if some people think about it!
https://bugzilla.mozilla.or
On 5/8/16 10:18 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
I was wondering if it makes to add in the supports() list all keywords which
have influences to the Chrome of browser, aka no effect on navigation context.
That depends on what the goal is, obviously.
* link rel="feed" has an effect on the chrome UI, by
On Thu, 05 May 2016 15:36:30 +0200, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Florin Mezei
wrote:
Do you still intend to do some analysis to see whether this will be a
problem in real life? We have somewhat of a history in shipping changes
that
break compatibility, and then end u
Hi everyone,
Here's the list of new issues found and filed by the Desktop Release QA
team last week, *May 2nd - May 6th* (week 18).
Additional details on the team's priorities last week, as well as the
plans for the current week are available at:
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/Des
(cross posting to dev-developer-tools)
I just filed the following bug for devtools support:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1271191
Right now, the devtools inspector panel displays CSS colors (in the Rules
sidebar panel) as editable color swatches, and allows to convert between
the v
20 matches
Mail list logo
