Am Montag, 9. Mai 2016 20:33:11 UTC+2 schrieb Andrew McCreight: > Thank you for opening a discussion thread rather than posting more in the > bug. > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a > > OSS Project! > > The same mistake made Oracle with OpenOffice! > > Now the project is almost death! > > Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots! > > Would be nice, if some people think about it! > > > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114647 > > I removed the marker that my comments are "Offtopic" ... (because I write > > my viewpoint to this topic!) > > ...and re-opened my attachment! > > Even if the employees are not interested how other OSS-Geeks see things > > that belong to the integration for Mozilla Products into Windows, this > > opinions of not-employees are anyway not "Offtopic", or "Spam"! > > > > I did not mark your posts off topic because you are not a Mozilla employee, > I marked them off-topic (comments 144, 145, and 146) because they are not > relevant to the technical discussion in the bug. The subject of the > bug is "Rename > the content process to something intelligible". Your posts are talking > about extensions breaking with e10s, how you are fine with breaking > Silverlight and Flash, and saying that Windows breaks software. None of > these advance the state of the discussion in the bug. > > Andrew > > > > > > > > Greets, Tobias. > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-platform mailing list > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > >
You should read the complete bug again! Above were a lot of comments why it is OK or not to break things or rename files or not! So were is really the difference then that I'm not a employee ???? _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
