Thank you for opening a discussion thread rather than posting more in the bug.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tobias B. Besemer < tobias.bese...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Ignoring viewpoints of non-Mozilla-employees can't be the way to go for a > OSS Project! > The same mistake made Oracle with OpenOffice! > Now the project is almost death! > Think Mozilla should find his way back to his roots! > Would be nice, if some people think about it! > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114647 > I removed the marker that my comments are "Offtopic" ... (because I write > my viewpoint to this topic!) > ...and re-opened my attachment! > Even if the employees are not interested how other OSS-Geeks see things > that belong to the integration for Mozilla Products into Windows, this > opinions of not-employees are anyway not "Offtopic", or "Spam"! > I did not mark your posts off topic because you are not a Mozilla employee, I marked them off-topic (comments 144, 145, and 146) because they are not relevant to the technical discussion in the bug. The subject of the bug is "Rename the content process to something intelligible". Your posts are talking about extensions breaking with e10s, how you are fine with breaking Silverlight and Flash, and saying that Windows breaks software. None of these advance the state of the discussion in the bug. Andrew > > > Greets, Tobias. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
