On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
> On 4/21/15 5:26 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> ...
>>
>> - the biggest backout rate for those authors is 48.8%.
>
> The suspense is killing me. Is it Ehsan?! ;-) ;-)
Clearly not:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> by raw numb
To get some feedback on AsyncPanZoom we are enabling it on tonight's nightly,
for Windows only. It will be re-disabled in the next nightly.
For those unfamiliar, APZ makes scrolling responsive by pre-rendering more
content than what is visible in the viewport [1]. This lets us present it
asynch
On 4/21/15 5:26 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
...
- the biggest backout rate for those authors is 48.8%.
The suspense is killing me. Is it Ehsan?! ;-) ;-)
Justin
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo
That sounds like a nice idea, though I wonder how you'd specify the
duration of the application of the stylesheet via a media query?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Christopher Lord
> wrote:
> > http://chrislord.net/?p=273&preview=1&
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:26:12AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:50:43PM -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> > On 21/04/15 02:41 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> > >On 4/21/15 11:27 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > >>>I agree that it shouldn't be 10%. Hopefully once we have the autol
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:50:43PM -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> On 21/04/15 02:41 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> >On 4/21/15 11:27 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> >>>I agree that it shouldn't be 10%. Hopefully once we have the autolander
> >>>this will be a non-issue.
> >>
> >>It would be a huge help
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
> Seeing how often I get pushback from people over backouts, I wouldn't agree
> with this premise, FWIW.
People, remember to *thank* the person who backs out your code.
Just like you should thank people for finding your bugs. Better now
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:31:28PM -0700, Bobby Holley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
> > Right. Someone just needs to collect the data *privately* and then notify
> > people or take other remedial action.
> >
>
> Personally, I'd much rather keep an eye on
I personally have no objection to my name being publicly visible on the
list. I don't care either way about the ability to see other people's
names, as long as I know where I stand.
Oh, and if we want to remain anonymous, I'm sure we can all be randomly
affected city names or whatever. This will g
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Nick Fitzgerald
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> And this can surely be done via private channels, without public
>> shaming and the potential negatives people have listed elsewhere in the
>> thread, right?
>>
>
> How,
On 4/21/2015 4:56 PM, jmath...@mozilla.com wrote:
I think we're being bit too sensitive here, I'm sure we can all handle a little
public shaming on stuff like this. :) If you find yourself on the top of a list
like list, and you feel a bit bad about it, good. Learn from it, push to try
more of
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Nick Fitzgerald
wrote:
>
>
> And this can surely be done via private channels, without public shaming
> and the potential negatives people have listed elsewhere in the thread,
> right?
>
How, exactly?I want the ability to see where I match up against my peers.
Hi all,
Bug 1145439 has landed, which means that we now throttle requestAnimationFrame
for offscreen iframes.
This should give us significant benefits in terms of CPU and energy usage for
pages with iframes that do animation - think HTML5 ads. One test, on
areweflashyet.com, showed a 50% improvem
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> It's not about making mistakes - it's about being mis-calibrated with
> respect to the rest of the development community. And it's not about
> shaming - it's about making people (both the developer and others) aware of
> these mismatches so t
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Robert O'Callahan
wrote:
> Right. Someone just needs to collect the data *privately* and then notify
> people or take other remedial action.
>
Personally, I'd much rather keep an eye on the leaderboard and police
myself, rather than waiting for somebody to send m
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:06 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
> I think it would be good to have metrics on rates at which different
> people break inbound, partly because I think the system works better
> when people use a similar amount of care to each other (as opposed
> to some people being less care
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Andrew Halberstadt <
ahalberst...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> But contributors aside, it could be de-motivating for employees too. If I
> break inbound, I already feel really bad about it.. no need to rub it in my
> face :). If there are employees who are blatantly abusi
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
> On 2015-04-21 4:56 PM, jmath...@mozilla.com wrote:
>
>> I think we're being bit too sensitive here, I'm sure we can all handle a
>> little public shaming on stuff like this.
>>
> We should not do this. There aren't a lot of things that will rot
On 2015-04-21 4:56 PM, jmath...@mozilla.com wrote:
I think we're being bit too sensitive here, I'm sure we can all handle a little
public shaming on stuff like this.
We should not do this. There aren't a lot of things that will rot
organizational morale and make people risk-averse faster and mo
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:11:36PM -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> On 21/04/15 03:02 PM, Aaron Klotz wrote:
> >On 4/21/2015 12:50 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> >>
> >>This could be effective, but if not implemented with care it could
> >>also be very de-motivating, especially for a well-intent
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:11:43 PM UTC-5, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> On 21/04/15 03:02 PM, Aaron Klotz wrote:
> > On 4/21/2015 12:50 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> >>
> >> This could be effective, but if not implemented with care it could
> >> also be very de-motivating, especially for a we
On 2015-04-21 3:30 PM, Aaron Klotz wrote:
Sure, a valid point. A public shaming is not necessary.
I think people may have misunderstood what I suggested. How about a
tool that lets you login through Persona and then tells you (and only
you) how well you're doing? :-)
_
I think it would be good to have metrics on rates at which different
people break inbound, partly because I think the system works better
when people use a similar amount of care to each other (as opposed
to some people being less careful and breaking inbound a lot, and
others being very careful an
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Christopher Lord wrote:
> http://chrislord.net/?p=273&preview=1&_ppp=0afe20d87f
I haven't reviewed it completely, but it seems at the very least you
should use media queries rather than require separate stylesheets.
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
_
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:11:36PM -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> On 21/04/15 03:02 PM, Aaron Klotz wrote:
> >On 4/21/2015 12:50 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
> >>
> >>This could be effective, but if not implemented with care it could
> >>also be very de-motivating, especially for a well-intent
On 4/21/2015 1:11 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
On 21/04/15 03:02 PM, Aaron Klotz wrote:
On 4/21/2015 12:50 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
This could be effective, but if not implemented with care it could
also be very de-motivating, especially for a well-intentioned
contributor.
Is this real
On 21/04/15 03:02 PM, Aaron Klotz wrote:
On 4/21/2015 12:50 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
This could be effective, but if not implemented with care it could
also be very de-motivating, especially for a well-intentioned
contributor.
Is this really an issue though, given the time and effort req
On 4/21/2015 12:50 PM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
This could be effective, but if not implemented with care it could
also be very de-motivating, especially for a well-intentioned
contributor.
Is this really an issue though, given the time and effort required to
earn sufficient commit access
On 21/04/15 02:41 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 4/21/15 11:27 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I agree that it shouldn't be 10%. Hopefully once we have the autolander
this will be a non-issue.
It would be a huge help if someone made a little tool which would show
you how often one specific person break
On 4/21/15 11:27 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I agree that it shouldn't be 10%. Hopefully once we have the autolander
this will be a non-issue.
It would be a huge help if someone made a little tool which would show
you how often one specific person breaks inbound. I would definitely
like to know w
On 2015-04-21 12:20 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/2015 06:07 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:39 AM, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:03:37 AM UTC-5, Gabriele Svelto
w
This form has some issues. There are required sections of "Downloading with
scripts and other programs" that only make sense for developers of the
script or download tool.
- Which protocols do you use ? (no idea whatever mozregression uses)
- Please describe what your scripts/programs/scrape
Hi people,
I've spent the last week or so articulating some thoughts on navigation
transitions. This is something I've thought about before (as I'm sure a lot
of us have), but seeing Google's proposal encouraged me to get it written
down. I'm not a huge fan of all aspects of their proposal, so I'v
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/21/2015 06:07 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:39 AM, wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:03:37 AM UTC-5, Gabriele Svelto
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 21/04/2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/21/2015 06:07 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:39 AM, wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:03:37 AM UTC-5, Gabriele Svelto
>> wrote:
>>> On 21/04/2015 08:25, Gabor Krizsanits wrote:
Maybe because I usually work o
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:39 AM, wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:03:37 AM UTC-5, Gabriele Svelto wrote:
> > On 21/04/2015 08:25, Gabor Krizsanits wrote:
> > > Maybe because I usually work on core, and such confidence is hard to
> reach
> > > there, but I'd like to think at least a try ru
Hi dev-platform,
Heads up: I just landed on Inbound a patch that gives nsIntPoint and
nsIntRect the same treatment I gave to nsIntSize: these two classes are now
typedefs of mozilla::gfx::IntPoint and mozilla::gfx::IntRect, which means
that they can't be forward-declared as they used to, but other
On 2015-04-21 6:43 AM, skuldw...@gmail.com wrote:
I know, not that well explained and over simplified. But the concept
is hopefully clear, but in case it's not...
For what it's worth, a lot of really smart people have been thinking
about this problem for a while and there aren't a lot of easy bu
Very briefly:
On 21/04/15 12:43, skuldw...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1. User downloads a browser (be it Firefox, Chrome, Opera, etc.)
> securely (https?) from the official download location. 2. Upon
> installation a private key is created for that browser installation
> and signed by the browser's certif
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:03:37 AM UTC-5, Gabriele Svelto wrote:
> On 21/04/2015 08:25, Gabor Krizsanits wrote:
> > Maybe because I usually work on core, and such confidence is hard to reach
> > there, but I'd like to think at least a try run that check if the patch
> > builds on all platform
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:57:58 PM UTC+2, Richard Barnes wrote:
> In order to encourage web developers to move from HTTP to HTTPS, I would
> like to propose establishing a deprecation plan for HTTP without security.
I think server side SSL certificates should be deprecated as a means to encry
ftp.mozilla.org has been around for a long time in the world of Mozilla,
dating back to original source release in 1998. Originally it was a
single server, but it’s grown into a cluster storing more than 60TB of
data, and serving more than a gigabit/s in traffic. Many projects store
their files the
On 21/04/2015 08:25, Gabor Krizsanits wrote:
> Maybe because I usually work on core, and such confidence is hard to reach
> there, but I'd like to think at least a try run that check if the patch
> builds on all platform and a full test run on at least one platform is not
> too much sacrifice of on
43 matches
Mail list logo
