On 05/02/2013 16:26, Ralph Giles wrote:
On 13-02-05 4:56 AM, rvj wrote:
A request for a simple audio/sound interface seems to be doomed for
a decade
Can you be more specific? I don't know what "operating system sound
control" is. What bug are you referring to?
There's a lot of work goin
Some key contributors are away at the DOM/WebAPI work week. Next meeting will
be on Feb 12.
In the meantime, please check out Nick's excellent blog about all things
Memshrink:
https://blog.mozilla.org/nnethercote/
See you next week!
--Jet
___
dev-pl
I have added some nsTArray-like APIs for those of you who want to be
able to switch between nsTArray and nsCOMArray. The following *Element*
APIs have been created based on the *Object* APIs, however the return
value has been changed from bool to void where possible (only the
*Object* APIs perf
On 2013-02-05 11:18 AM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari a écrit :
currently we cannot do 64-bit PGO builds because of an internal compiler
error on mozilla-central.
Also with VS2012 ?
I'm not aware if anybody has tried 64-bit PGO builds with VS2012.
Cheers,
Ehsan
I have implemented a custom protocol handler. Now i am trying to get the POST
data when a post request is made to my custom protocol.
So far i have nsiProtocolHandler::NewChannel in which i changed the scheme of
the uri from custom to "https" and created new channel.
In my channel i have implem
> I think I got a little confused.
--read-var-info=yes will eat up all your memory (at least with libxul.so)
for very little benefit. I suggest not using it.
> But ithout --read-var-info=yes, it is a little difficult to
--track-origins=yes provides you with useful information. If that
doesn't
On 13-02-05 4:56 AM, rvj wrote:
> A request for a simple audio/sound interface seems to be doomed for
> a decade
Can you be more specific? I don't know what "operating system sound
control" is. What bug are you referring to?
There's a lot of work going on right now to develop audio-related
Ehsan Akhgari a écrit :
currently we cannot do 64-bit PGO builds because of an internal compiler
error on mozilla-central.
Also with VS2012 ?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 2013-02-04 10:07 PM, Ryan VanderMeulen wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:59 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
I was talking to Taras and Naveed about this today, and what also came
up was:
4. Do the work to make 64-bit JS jit perf as good as 32-bit JS jit
perf, and then switch to x64 builds for Windows. There are
On 2013-02-04 9:59 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
On Friday, February 1, 2013 7:19:04 PM UTC-8, Brian Smith wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Given the above, I'd like to propose the following long-term
solutions:
1. Did we try escalating a support request to Microsoft regarding this issue? I
know
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 6:14:47 AM UTC-5, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> Is that replacing dev-doc-needed or is it for documentation bugs filling
> only?
dev-doc-needed will still be used, but its primary purpose will be to let the
docs team know that a doc bug needs to be filed. We have a guide
A request for a simple audio/sound interface seems to be doomed for a
decade
but just out of interest what would it take to bribe someone to write
something to access the operating system sound control?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-pla
Well if print.show_print_progress = false did what I thought it should
which is to suppress
a) preview progress dialog box (and)
b) printing progress dialog box
that would suit me fine
"Zack Weinberg" wrote in message
news:eq2dncuto_2uwjlmnz2dnuvz_tidn...@mozilla.org...
On 2013-02
13 matches
Mail list logo
