sebbASF commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-887893058
"I'd like to understand when and where the decision was made that we should
implement LDAP person."
That's a question for Infra, but as far as I know, the ASF LDAP schema is
clr-apache commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-887884985
Hi Sebb,
I am inclined to agree with you that the only reason we have LDAP sn is to
satisfy a schema requirement that an LDAP "person" needs a cn and an sn.
I'd li
sebbASF commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-887426891
The test cases are in lib/spec/lib/person_spec.rb.
However, I think this is all moot.
I don't think there is a use-case for the sn and givenName fields.
INFRA have a
