I support this RFC and will shepherd it through review process. It looks like
we have some :heart: from the OctoML folks, but would be great to get some
feedback from others in the community, particularly from folks who may be
monitoring TVM PRs less frequently than those of us at Octo.
Let's
It definitely makes sense for us to reduce the traffic from the github emails.
Github teams is definitely a good idea. I'm supportive 👍
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/4)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mod
Supportive. It's tedious that Apache org creates many barriers for us to
leverage a more systematic way, but the proposed solutions with a number of
bots to assist the review process are definitely helpful.
Meanwhile, I recall that one important reason of adding code owners is to help
improv
I agree that the existing approach does not work well and support this RFC :+1:
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/6)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https
