Supportive. It's tedious that Apache org creates many barriers for us to leverage a more systematic way, but the proposed solutions with a number of bots to assist the review process are definitely helpful.
Meanwhile, I recall that one important reason of adding code owners is to help improve the PR visibility from new contributors who don't know anyone in the community and have no idea who to cc. In this case, it's possible that no one from the community will participate the PR so the proposed solutions still cannot help. Thus, I would suggest adding one more change to this RFC (either of the following): 1. Improve the PR template to guide the contributors about how to improve the PR visibility. We actually have this already but seems not effective. Pro: it is a simple change. Con: it may be ignored by most contributors. 2. Improve the cc-bot to do more. For example, if the cc-bot finds no @ in the PR body, it replies the PR saying that it is encouraged to cc someone from the community for visibility and here is the code owner list. Pro: this will definitely get the attention by PR author. Con: it needs more changes to the cc-bot. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/5) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/5266d1eb0b09e613769ffd4b6b9e1b4c9a36bbb3ea37fec9583fa693dd1a79c0).
