I support this RFC and will shepherd it through review process. It looks like we have some :heart: from the OctoML folks, but would be great to get some feedback from others in the community, particularly from folks who may be monitoring TVM PRs less frequently than those of us at Octo.
Let's allow for comments through end of this week, and we can propose the formal RFC on Friday. My personal opinion of this is that I think removing automatic assignment of reviewers from CODEOWNERS will help to reduce the spam and make it easier to respond to PRs. I'm not sure this is a full-fledged replacement for CODEOWNERS, and such a replacement may become necessary in the future. However, I think it's a good start, and we can continue to iterate on this problem once we reduce the blast radius of each PR (in terms of review requests). However, I also helped author this RFC so I don't feel comfortable proceeding without feedback from the rest of the community. ccing a few folks from the community @Mousius @manupa-arm @leandron @ramana-arm @comaniac @yzhliu @ziheng @wrongtest @kparzysz @hjiang --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-remove-codeowners/12095/3) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/926162101dc82f2153bea8810ebee9f2dcec6482cd841d024cba1a049c6076df).
