I may have broken that in my last patch. I know I had to make changes there. I
recommend tweaking the code to follow the comment, and then implementing
dynamic SSLNetProcessor.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012, 11:02:46 PM, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following commen
On 2/8/12 11:18 PM, James Peach wrote:
On 08/02/2012, at 9:02 PM, James Peach wrote:
Hi all,
In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following comment:
// Set number of ssl threads equal to num of processors if
// SSL is enabled so it will scale properly. If SSL is not
// enabled, leave num
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2012, at 9:02 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following comment:
> >
> > // Set number of ssl threads equal to num of processors if
> > // SSL is enabled so it will scale properly. If SSL is not
> > // ena
On 08/02/2012, at 9:02 PM, James Peach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following comment:
>
> // Set number of ssl threads equal to num of processors if
> // SSL is enabled so it will scale properly. If SSL is not
> // enabled, leave num of ssl threads one, incase a r
Hi all,
In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following comment:
// Set number of ssl threads equal to num of processors if
// SSL is enabled so it will scale properly. If SSL is not
// enabled, leave num of ssl threads one, incase a remap rule
// requires traffic server to act as an ssl cl