last chance for votes.
I'll t&r this evening
i
- Original Message -
> Again, this is a broken API only on 3.0.x branch, trunk is fine.
>
> Brian
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Brian Geffon
> wrote:
>
> > Nick,
> > Are you on the 3.0.x branch because I just did:
> >
> > bgeffon-mn:
Again, this is a broken API only on 3.0.x branch, trunk is fine.
Brian
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Nick,
> Are you on the 3.0.x branch because I just did:
>
> bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git pull
> Already up-to-date.
> bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git branc
Nick,
Are you on the 3.0.x branch because I just did:
bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git pull
Already up-to-date.
bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git branch -a
* 3.0.x
master
remotes/origin/2.0.x
remotes/origin/3.0.x
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/dev
remotes/
On 9 Feb 2012, at 16:31, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Look at InkAPC.cc in 3.0.x that declaration in ts.h.in doesn't match
> the definition, that's the problem.
$ grep TSFetchUrl proxy/api/ts/ts.h.in
[...]
tsapi void TSFetchUrl(const char* request,int request_len, struct sockaddr
const*
Nick,
Look at InkAPC.cc in 3.0.x that declaration in ts.h.in doesn't match
the definition, that's the problem.
Brian.
On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:25 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>>
>> On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote:
> [snip]
>> @@ -57,22 +57,23 @@
>> *) Build:
- Original Message -
>
> On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote:
[snip]
> @@ -57,22 +57,23 @@
>*) Build: Add possibility to extend tsxs command line for
>-Iincludes.
> Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1212075
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
- Original Message -
>
> On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > I'll post my patch here so as not to delay it while I find my way
> > into ASF git.
>
> Looks like the listserver stripped out the attachment. Inlining ...
>
>
>
> Index: STATUS
> =
- Original Message -
>
> On 7 Feb 2012, at 15:45, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I'd like to call for last votes on our 3.0.x/STATUS:
>
> Lower-hanging fruit reviewed. Some other proposals looked at but
> taking longer
> to get my poor little braincell around.
>
> Came to
On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote:
> I'll post my patch here so as not to delay it while I find my way
> into ASF git.
Looks like the listserver stripped out the attachment. Inlining ...
Index: STATUS
===
--- STATUS
On 7 Feb 2012, at 15:45, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I'd like to call for last votes on our 3.0.x/STATUS:
Lower-hanging fruit reviewed. Some other proposals looked at but taking longer
to get my poor little braincell around.
Came to commit but got FORBIDDEN. I'm guessing that's dow
- Original Message -
>
> On 7 Feb 2012, at 15:45, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> > I'm going to t&r on Thursday no matter what it looks like
> > so if there's any bugs or fixes you'd like to see in 3.0.3
> > you'd better vote.
>
> Thanks for the call!
>
> If that were Friday or weekend instead of
On 7 Feb 2012, at 15:45, Igor Galić wrote:
> I'm going to t&r on Thursday no matter what it looks like
> so if there's any bugs or fixes you'd like to see in 3.0.3
> you'd better vote.
Thanks for the call!
If that were Friday or weekend instead of Thursday, I might have a good session
reviewing
Hey folks,
I'd like to call for last votes on our 3.0.x/STATUS:
*) API: Wrong implementation of TSHttpSsnArgGet().
Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1220600
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1055
+1: zwoop, igalic
*) Traffic Cop
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > it's been a good two months since we had a stable release.
> > Considering how much we've done on trunk, maybe we should
> > kick one off.
> > I invite everyone - especially our new committers - to
> > prop
- Original Message -
>
> Hey folks,
>
> it's been a good two months since we had a stable release.
> Considering how much we've done on trunk, maybe we should
> kick one off.
> I invite everyone - especially our new committers - to
> propose backports in Jira (and/or STATUS), as well as
>
15 matches
Mail list logo