Re: SVN vs Git

2011-12-02 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 12/1/11 5:56 PM, Alan M. Carroll wrote: I suppose I can get used to git (after all, I eventually moved on from RCS). In exchange, you guys can get used to templates :-). Eep, that seems like a steep price to pay ;) -- leif

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-12-02 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > I suppose I can get used to git (after all, I eventually moved on > from RCS). In exchange, you guys can get used to templates :-). +0 git -0 templates Both make my head hurt. +1 for progress - if that means git or templates or both, I'm in > Thursday, December

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-12-01 Thread mohan_zl
git +1 2011/12/2 ming@gmail.com > +1 > > we use git in every day of TS, let us move forward. > > 在 2011-12-01四的 17:00 -0700,Leif Hedstrom写道: > > On 12/1/11 4:56 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On 11/29/11 12:04 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > >> +1 git > > >> > > >> I use git for all my work and am

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-12-01 Thread ming....@gmail.com
+1 we use git in every day of TS, let us move forward. 在 2011-12-01四的 17:00 -0700,Leif Hedstrom写道: > On 12/1/11 4:56 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > On 11/29/11 12:04 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > >> +1 git > >> > >> I use git for all my work and am accustomed to cloning svn repos into > >> git. There a

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-12-01 Thread Alan M. Carroll
I suppose I can get used to git (after all, I eventually moved on from RCS). In exchange, you guys can get used to templates :-). Thursday, December 1, 2011, 5:56:32 PM, you wrote: > Perhaps some of our elders can let us know if we should back off here, and > take the time to think and do anoth

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-12-01 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 12/1/11 4:56 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: On 11/29/11 12:04 PM, Bryan Call wrote: +1 git I use git for all my work and am accustomed to cloning svn repos into git. There are some disadvantages of doing a svn clone into git instead of cloning from a git repo. The thing I hate the most is that

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-12-01 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 11/29/11 12:04 PM, Bryan Call wrote: +1 git I use git for all my work and am accustomed to cloning svn repos into git. There are some disadvantages of doing a svn clone into git instead of cloning from a git repo. The thing I hate the most is that the svn history can be lost when cloning

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-29 Thread Bryan Call
+1 git I use git for all my work and am accustomed to cloning svn repos into git. There are some disadvantages of doing a svn clone into git instead of cloning from a git repo. The thing I hate the most is that the svn history can be lost when cloning into git. I have seen this when doing a

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-28 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > Hi all, > > There has been a sometimes heated discussion at the ASF over Git vs > Subversion. I'm not going to reiterate all that here. However, I'd > like for us to start a discussion whether we want to migrate to Git, > or stay with Subversion. Infraops are lookin

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-26 Thread Eric Ahn
+1 git Eric iPhone 2011. 11. 26. 오후 12:29 Jason Giedymin 작성: > Git +1 > > -Jason > > On Nov 25, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On 11/25/11 3:40 PM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> I was +-0 there, and the same here. Not against it, but neither would I >>> want to be pushed by the more be

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-25 Thread Jason Giedymin
Git +1 -Jason On Nov 25, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 11/25/11 3:40 PM, Nick Kew wrote: >> I was +-0 there, and the same here. Not against it, but neither would I want >> to be pushed by the more belligerent elements of the peanut gallery. It's >> only a tool! IMHO an importan

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-25 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 11/25/11 3:40 PM, Nick Kew wrote: I was +-0 there, and the same here. Not against it, but neither would I want to be pushed by the more belligerent elements of the peanut gallery. It's only a tool! IMHO an important consideration is to work within what infra@ is ready for, and comfortable wi

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-25 Thread John Plevyak
I am for git. It is more flexible and faster. On Nov 25, 2011 12:15 PM, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote: > Hi all, > > There has been a sometimes heated discussion at the ASF over Git vs > Subversion. I'm not going to reiterate all that here. However, I'd like for > us to start a discussion whether we wan

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-25 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:14:53 -0700 Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Hi all, > > There has been a sometimes heated discussion at the ASF over Git vs > Subversion. I'm not going to reiterate all that here. However, I'd like for > us to start a discussion whether we want to migrate to Git, or stay with >

Re: SVN vs Git

2011-11-25 Thread Theo Schlossnagle
git would make the work I do easier. SVN is in no way a showstopper, but having multiple remotely accessible local branches would make it easier for me to vet ideas and implementations before proposing them back to the community. -- Theo Schlossnagle (mobile) http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnag