git +1 2011/12/2 ming....@gmail.com <ming....@gmail.com>
> +1 > > we use git in every day of TS, let us move forward. > > 在 2011-12-01四的 17:00 -0700，Leif Hedstrom写道： > > On 12/1/11 4:56 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On 11/29/11 12:04 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > >> +1 git > > >> > > >> I use git for all my work and am accustomed to cloning svn repos into > > >> git. There are some disadvantages of doing a svn clone into git > instead > > >> of cloning from a git repo. The thing I hate the most is that the svn > > >> history can be lost when cloning into git. I have seen this when > doing a > > >> move in svn and a clone to git doesn't recognize this and it loses all > > >> prior history on the file. > > > > > > The general consensus seems to be that Git is preferable. Would it be > out > > > of line for me to volunteer us to participate in the Git alpha testing? > > > Unfortunately, the deadline to volunteer is tomorrow, so there's not > > > enough time to do an official vote (although, technically, several > people > > > have already voted here :). Fwiw, I'm definitely +1 on Git as well. > > > > > > I spoke with infra-ops briefly, and here's the scope: We'd have to > request > > by tomorrow to *potentially* participate in the Git alpha testing. That > > doesn't mean that we are obligated to do the migration, i.e. we still > have > > time to back out should someone -1 / object to it. > > > > So, unless I hear otherwise, I will send a proposal for ATS to join the > git > > alpha testing to infra-ops tomorrow. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- Leif > > > > -- > zym, Zhao Yongming. > aka: yonghao @ taobao.com > > -- 张练 mohan...@taobao.com
