On 11/29/11 12:04 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
+1 git
I use git for all my work and am accustomed to cloning svn repos into git.
There are some disadvantages of doing a svn clone into git instead of cloning
from a git repo. The thing I hate the most is that the svn history can be lost
when cloning into git. I have seen this when doing a move in svn and a clone
to git doesn't recognize this and it loses all prior history on the file.
The general consensus seems to be that Git is preferable. Would it be out of
line for me to volunteer us to participate in the Git alpha testing?
Unfortunately, the deadline to volunteer is tomorrow, so there's not enough
time to do an official vote (although, technically, several people have
already voted here :). Fwiw, I'm definitely +1 on Git as well.
Perhaps some of our elders can let us know if we should back off here, and
take the time to think and do another vote before doing this.
Thanks
-- leif
