- Original Message -
>
> First off, sorry for the late reply: WORK.
>
> Next
> +1 on 3.0.4
>
> Also, someone should fix up our release process wiki,
> in case someone (me?!) left out a step or two.
>
> n.b.: zym had an issue with TrafficManager -- someone might
> want to take a look at th
First off, sorry for the late reply: WORK.
Next
+1 on 3.0.4
Also, someone should fix up our release process wiki,
in case someone (me?!) left out a step or two.
n.b.: zym had an issue with TrafficManager -- someone might
want to take a look at that and +/-1 the backport proposal
and.. maybe.. b
I like that idea. Igor, thoughts?
Brian
On Feb 15, 2012, at 9:02 PM, James Peach wrote:
> On 15/02/2012, at 8:58 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
>> Because according to zwoop, once the dist has been pushed they aren't
>> really sure how to fix it..it's technically released, we just
>> haven't publi
On 15/02/2012, at 8:58 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Because according to zwoop, once the dist has been pushed they aren't
> really sure how to fix it..it's technically released, we just
> haven't publicly announced it.
then releasing 3.0.4 and quietly forgetting about 3.0.3 seems like the lesser
ev
Because according to zwoop, once the dist has been pushed they aren't
really sure how to fix it..it's technically released, we just
haven't publicly announced it.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:56 PM, James Peach wrote:
> On 15/02/2012, at 8:55 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> > And never publicly releas
On 15/02/2012, at 8:55 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> And never publicly release 3.0.3?
Oh, if 3.0.3 hasn't flown the coop yet, then why not fix it there?
>
> Brian
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:51 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
>> On 15/02/2012, at 8:28 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Everyone,
And never publicly release 3.0.3?
Brian
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:51 PM, James Peach wrote:
> On 15/02/2012, at 8:28 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
>
> > Hello Everyone,
> > As some may or may not know, the RC for ATS 3.0.3 has a minor issue in
> that
> > the ts.h generated does not correctly set the
On 15/02/2012, at 8:28 PM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> As some may or may not know, the RC for ATS 3.0.3 has a minor issue in that
> the ts.h generated does not correctly set the minor version or the integer
> version number in ts.h. Do we have any proposals on how to deal with this?
>
Hello Everyone,
As some may or may not know, the RC for ATS 3.0.3 has a minor issue in that
the ts.h generated does not correctly set the minor version or the integer
version number in ts.h. Do we have any proposals on how to deal with this?
One issue that immediately comes to mind is that in 3.0.3
