Because according to zwoop, once the dist has been pushed they aren't really sure how to fix it..it's technically released, we just haven't publicly announced it.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:56 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: > On 15/02/2012, at 8:55 PM, Brian Geffon wrote: > > > And never publicly release 3.0.3? > > Oh, if 3.0.3 hasn't flown the coop yet, then why not fix it there? > > > > > Brian > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:51 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On 15/02/2012, at 8:28 PM, Brian Geffon wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Everyone, > >>> As some may or may not know, the RC for ATS 3.0.3 has a minor issue in > >> that > >>> the ts.h generated does not correctly set the minor version or the > >> integer > >>> version number in ts.h. Do we have any proposals on how to deal with > >> this? > >>> One issue that immediately comes to mind is that in 3.0.3 we fixed the > >>> broken TSFetchUrl declaration, and unfortunately because the version > >>> numbers are broken in ts.h applications using the api and TSFetchUrl > >> don't > >>> have an easy way to determine whether they need to include a forward > >>> declaration for TSFetchUrl now. > >>> > >>> What does everyone think. Suggestions on how to resolve this? > >> > >> Spin a 3.0.4 that just fixes the version numbers? > >> > >> J > >> > >
