On 15/02/2012, at 8:58 PM, Brian Geffon wrote: > Because according to zwoop, once the dist has been pushed they aren't > really sure how to fix it..it's technically released, we just > haven't publicly announced it.
then releasing 3.0.4 and quietly forgetting about 3.0.3 seems like the lesser evil J > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:56 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 15/02/2012, at 8:55 PM, Brian Geffon wrote: >> >>> And never publicly release 3.0.3? >> >> Oh, if 3.0.3 hasn't flown the coop yet, then why not fix it there? >> >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:51 PM, James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 15/02/2012, at 8:28 PM, Brian Geffon wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>> As some may or may not know, the RC for ATS 3.0.3 has a minor issue in >>>> that >>>>> the ts.h generated does not correctly set the minor version or the >>>> integer >>>>> version number in ts.h. Do we have any proposals on how to deal with >>>> this? >>>>> One issue that immediately comes to mind is that in 3.0.3 we fixed the >>>>> broken TSFetchUrl declaration, and unfortunately because the version >>>>> numbers are broken in ts.h applications using the api and TSFetchUrl >>>> don't >>>>> have an easy way to determine whether they need to include a forward >>>>> declaration for TSFetchUrl now. >>>>> >>>>> What does everyone think. Suggestions on how to resolve this? >>>> >>>> Spin a 3.0.4 that just fixes the version numbers? >>>> >>>> J >>>> >> >>
