Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-28 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:18 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote: > >> >> 1) You use this feature? > > Yes, we do use this feature. > >> >> 2) You will support this feature, and work on the code? > > sure we will support it, because we use it. Alright, cool. Lets keep log collation, I’ll reopen the clo

Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-28 Thread Yongming Zhao
> > 1) You use this feature? Yes, we do use this feature. > > 2) You will support this feature, and work on the code? sure we will support it, because we use it. just go thorough the jira you listed below, looks not that bad, I think we can fix it, let us fix them first to in the ‘probation

Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-28 Thread Theo Schlossnagle
Yes. -1 from me. On Apr 28, 2015 12:54 AM, "Leif Hedstrom" wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Theo Schlossnagle > wrote: > > > > I'm pretty sure we use log collation here. Also, we tend to not have any > > issues with it. > > > Roger. Surprised you are at least not running into the orph

Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-27 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Theo Schlossnagle wrote: > > I'm pretty sure we use log collation here. Also, we tend to not have any > issues with it. Roger. Surprised you are at least not running into the orphaned log issues :). Should I consider this a -1 vote then to not eliminate this f

Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-27 Thread Theo Schlossnagle
I'm pretty sure we use log collation here. Also, we tend to not have any issues with it. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote: > > > > on the collation: > > I don’t get that many critical bugs on collation: project = TS

Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-27 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Apr 27, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote: > > on the collation: > I don’t get that many critical bugs on collation: project = TS AND component > = Logging AND resolution = Unresolved AND text ~ "collation" ORDER BY due > ASC, priority DESC, created ASC > so, what is the problem we

Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-27 Thread Yongming Zhao
on the collation: I don’t get that many critical bugs on collation: project = TS AND component = Logging AND resolution = Unresolved AND text ~ "collation" ORDER BY due ASC, priority DESC, created ASC so, what is the problem we would like to remove it completely? the current ATS logging a u

[FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] Log collation

2015-04-21 Thread Leif Hedstrom
We have a feature to do remote logging, called “log collation”. This runs either as part of traffic_server itself, or using the stand-alone collector, traffic_sac. The issues with log collation are * Not well supported, no development / fixes are done on critical bugs * It has so