I'm pretty sure we use log collation here. Also, we tend to not have any issues with it.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Yongming Zhao <ming....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > on the collation: > > I don’t get that many critical bugs on collation: project = TS AND > component = Logging AND resolution = Unresolved AND text ~ "collation" > ORDER BY due ASC, priority DESC, created ASC > > so, what is the problem we would like to remove it completely? > > > We closed a few of them as Won’t Fix. But the issues that were crippling > were > > - There is no way to replay an orphaned log > > and together with > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2629 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2062 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2101 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2781 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-910 > > > this becomes completely crippling (it filled up our disks). > > > > > > > the current ATS logging a ugly but very good in performance thinking > log system, the SAC is a dedicated commercial server to offer log collation > service, due to that we are now open sourced, that is a good idea removing > the duplicated SAC codes. In our using with syslog-ng, it’s performance > may affect very busy ATS systems, that is why Yunkai pushed many collation > improvements. > > No one has said anything about the logging infrastructure itself. In fact, > I do not think it’s ugly, I think it’s very good. This has nothing to do > with that, logging will work as it does. > > > > > yes, logging has some ugly bugs, but collation should not that bad > after Yunkai’s work, and it does not bother you if you just logging to > local disk and collection with the other systems, right? > > > Yes, it did bother us, because the misbehavior around orphaned logs are > crippling. > > > > > please consider keep this feature, I am very happy that a simple > collation works for me out of box. > > > > sure you may find someone will take interest in supporting it, only if > it is still there. > > > So, I take it that > > 1) You use this feature? > > 2) You will support this feature, and work on the code? > > > > I could probably be convinced to give this feature another year > “probation”, but only under the conditions that you answered “yes” to both > questions above. If so, I’ll file a Jira on the biggest issue, that > orphaned logs are abandoned with no way to get inserted again. > > > Anyone else have any thoughts on this? > > > — Leif > > -- Theo Schlossnagle http://omniti.com/is/theo-schlossnagle
