Hiho all,
attached is a variation on John Yates' dmenu xft patch that actually
works (fixed segfault on exit, plus you can actually choose fonts other
than the default).
Regards,
Mate
diff -r 9b203c5c180d config.h
--- a/config.h Sat Apr 18 12:50:12 2009 +0100
+++ b/config.h Thu May 21 11:11:04 2
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:01:27AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> I received my long awaited X200s yesterday, and the dwm development
> will continue now, first item in the queue is the new multihead
> support as discussed on IRC a while ago.
this is a very welcome development :)
the particulars
Hiho,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:03:24PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> Didn't the Ion maintainer consider switching to Windows over how
> totally retarded XrandR and Xinerama are?
yes, but the Ion maintainer is so legendarily insufferable that he's
possibly even worse than you :) (just read his blog)
Bes
Hi all,
this is a patch against current hg that attaches new clients above the
current focused client, as opposed to as master every time. (This is how
xmonad behaves).
Regards,
Mate
diff -r 4fff5050c835 dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Thu Jul 02 20:56:23 2009 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Sun Jul 05 15:54:30 2009 +0200
Yo,
> Something like this was requested by some people here and there who
> are not comfortable with running a tiling window manager for all the
> windows.
how is this different from Xephyr/Xnest?
Regards,
Mate
Greetings,
the attached patch moves the lt[] array inside the Monitor structure,
so setting layout on one monitor doesn't alter it on another in any way.
Regards,
Mate
diff -r 4fff5050c835 dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Thu Jul 02 20:56:23 2009 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Mon Jul 06 11:44:00 2009 +0200
@@ -136,6 +136,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:32:26AM +, Kupai József wrote:
Hiho,
> I have a problem with DWM.
> I start Xterm with Mod1-Shift-Return. When I press these buttons sometime
> Xterm does not start.
> I hear only a Beep, but there is no more Xterm window. In average I have to
> press Mod1-Shift-Retur
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:38:07PM +, Kupai József wrote:
> I start dwm with the dwm command after I killed twm.
> I have no ~/.xsession-errors
...rrighto.
Try to launch an xterm, then try launching further xterms from that
(from the same terminal command that's specified in your config.h). T
Hiho,
> Yes, thanks to them, and also to the patch contributors, I find bstack
> very useful. Does anyone happen to know if there's an nmaster patch for
> 5.6? It appears the last one is from 4.7 (2007).
http://port70.net/~kzed/dwm-5.6/
batteries not included / ymmv.
worksforme, though
Best r
> > anyway, i could agree with the change if it's just
> > #define MODKEY Mod1Mask|ControlMask
imho the best default is Mod1 - it's a lot less annoying than Ctrl+Alt,
in apps Esc+key can often be used instead. Ctrl+Alt is not a good
default, because it'll induce EMACS-fingers and scare off the use
Hello all,
I have updated my dwm-5.6 patches for dwm-5.6.1, and created a new
webpage for them:
http://port70.net/~kzed/dwm-5.6.1/
List of patches:
- attachabove
- nmaster+bstack (bugfixed version!)
- push
- fancybar
Fancybar is a tuned version of my dwm-5.6 statusbar patch, with real
the xorg.conf? What would "-1"?
> be, then?
-1 means not to put matching clients on any particular monitor
(instead, use the current selected monitor).
Numbering probably depends on how xinerama data is provided.
Best regards,
Mate Nagy
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 02:17:15AM +0200, Valentin wrote:
> Isn't that what screen's there for? :P
if only screen's interface for scrolling back wasn't ridiculously
uncomfortable. IMHO shift+pgup/pgdn, and horribile dictu mousewheel
scrolling are essential. On the other hand, regex search forward
Hiho,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:06:41AM +, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Are there any patches for dwm that let you spawn new clients as slaves instead
> of always making the new client master?
-> http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/attachabove
maybe this
Regards,
Mate
Hiho,
> I was wondering if it was possible to map keyboard buttons to move the
> mouse cursor/ send mouse button events. For example, I was thinning of
> having alt gr and the arrow buttons move the mouse cursor, and alt gr
> + "z", "x" and "c" send left, middle, right mouse button events.
have you
Hiho,
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:29:39AM -, hessi...@hessiess.com wrote:
> But these features are non-standard and will not work the same on
> different viewers, hence the point, HTML NEVER prints the same from two
> different viewers. Generally the point of systems like TeX is you can
> garent
bridges, etc. any more. They're all great
craftmanship, but completely uneconomical in this age. So sorry it
hurts ya.
Best regards,
Mate Nagy
Hiho,
> The Fibonacci spiral patch offers a new layout that arranges the clients in
> a spiral - http://www.aplusbi.com/projects/dwm/dwm-5.6.1-fibonacci.diff
neat
>
> The movestack patch allows you to swap the selected client with the client
> before or after it (a clone of the Xmonad mod-shift-j
> i'd argue that closures don't mix well with the c style of programming
>
> eg if you add closures then you'd need anonymous functions then you'd
> start writing in the functional style passing around functions then
> you'd need memory management to clean up the return values and
> arguments (so
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:05:22PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Whut? Lightweight resources on the host? How do you figure running a
> text editor in obfuscated javascript in a browser locally on your
> computer is lighter than running a text editor natively?
AND selling all your company and p
> What do others think about this proposal? No Xinerama support by default?
IMHO xinerama support should be enabled by default, since those -dev
libs are usually installed. (Disclaimer: I'm using Xinerama ;)
Regards,
Mate
Hiho,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 01:21:51AM +0200, Julien Steinhauser wrote:
> nmaster_bstack patch updated for dwm-5.7.
the nmaster patch page http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/nmaster actually
has this patch already; actually, a stilistically improved version by nsz.
(Yeah, I noticed after I updated
Hiho,
> Do you mean the nmaster-sym-5.7?
> At first glance, I didn't get what the sym stand for,
I believe 'sym' stands for 'symbol', because this variation rewrites
the layout symbol according to your current nmaster value (to 2]=, 3]=,
or T2T, T3T and so on).
> With it and nmaster=1, I could eve
Hiho,
> > But the nasty thing is, layout patches like gaplessgrid need to know
> > Monitor when compiled.
I thought the same, when writing nmaster+bstack, but then nsz has
rewritten it in its current form, and it doesn't need to know Monitor.
Look at http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/nmaster-sym.c
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 08:26:08PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Doesn't terrify me. I sleep quite well in fact.
>
> I do observe some obsession-terrification-related symptoms on this list.
> :)
in short: everyone who hates vi was molested as a kid.
makes sense
M.
> > sounds fine. Maybe with a keybinding and adding numbers to the link like
> > vimperator does.
> >
> Lynx-cur has also the numbering link feature as an option and doesn't use
> javascript for that as vimperator does.
the best thing about vimperator though (which makes it usable as
opposed to
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:58:39AM -0400, David Neu wrote:
> bstack.c (dwm 5.6.1) (20090908)
> bstackhoriz.c (dwm 5.6.1) (20090908)
>
> Can anyone advise what, if anything need to make them work with dwm 5.7.2?
you can use nmaster+bstack, which is up to date and is included in the
patches page (I
Hiho,
> I'm a little uneasy with that since I'm using Xinerama all the time
> nowadays. But I wouldn't mind doing that by default.
>
> Any complaints?
yes plz (although didn't we have this thread a couple of times?)
I think Xinerama should be enable by default - most people will have
the necessa
ce implemented (the things that make vimperator good)
Regards,
Mate Nagy
Hello,
> I'm officially announcing a go excercise project called: godwm (dwm
> implemented in Go)
i'd be interested in helping with this
Regards,
Mate
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 04:22:48PM +, Aled Gest wrote:
> Please don't fallaciously assume I don't know anything just because
> I'm criticizing a Language you're fanatical about.
> I agree, no language can directly accommodate all needs, but if I find
> my self wanting to write ugly macr
> Out of curiosity: what were the other reasons and what did you settle on
> instead (if anything)?
Windows (and the iPhone)
M.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:14:37PM +0100, Frederic DUBOIS wrote:
> Something like GraphApp? (http://www.enchantia.com/software/graphapp/)
looks nice until you realize it doesn't support fonts (and they even
ideologized it for themselves in the FAQ)
Mate
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:44:04PM +0100, pancake wrote:
> why do you need TTF? font rendering is a really complex stuff, in dwk
yes
> we were only planning to support monospaced fonts, calculate sizes
yes
> with changing size of fonts is really complex and cpu-intensive task and
yes
> i dont thin
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:57:31PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well one design decision for the API I'm in favor with is not to
> provide any font-related functionality in the first version and leave
> font rendering up to the implementation. If someone writes an app he
> shouldn't bother about
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> This has been the best thread in this mailing list in a long time, or
> perhaps ever.
i saw the line
"3237 Mar 05 Uriel ( 22) Re: [dev] unsubscribe"
in my mutt, and just for a tiny, fleeting moment, a glimmer of hope
Ma
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 04:08:03AM -0300, Axel Bayerl wrote:
> What you can try now, is to make it pass the validator:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/page-validator [validator.w3.org]
I want to comment on this:
page validation is an illusion, because there are no "web standards"
except for what the bro
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:52:14PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 5 April 2010 17:34, Charlie Kester wrote:
> > As for paragraphs, separating them with blank lines always made more
> > sense to me than tags, and here again, no closing tag is required.
no closing tags are required for eit
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:35:31AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> 1. Debian Squeeze (Linux 2.6.32)
> 2. Radeon HD 3600 card
> 3. xserver-xorg 7.5
> 4. xserver-xorg-core 1.7.6
>
> If you have a similar set up I'd like to try out your xorg.conf.
incidentally, when i last saw
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:35:31AM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> Finally got a second monitor but can't get Xinerama to function for the
> life of me.
> ..
> 2. Radeon HD 3600 card
hahahahah sorry you're screwed
Mate
PS. for all seriousness it's gonna be pretty difficult, i always had a
t
Why do I get mail on the *suckless* mailing list that *literally*
contains 10 pages of css? ("suckless" web framework right)
Is this some kind of weird parallel universe or something, because
please teleport me back
M.
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 08:42:48PM -0700, Robert Ransom wrote:
> You need a definition of 'suckless user interface' before you start
> specifying guidelines for how to produce one.
>
> Here's a draft:
>
> A suckless user interface is:
>
> * useful,
> * usable,
> * transparent,
> * eith
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0200, Gregor Best wrote:
> There are languages (such as arabic) that are not written in the latin
> left-to-right fashion but exactly the other way round (i.e. you have to
> start reading at the right end of a line and end at the left).
indeed! let's depend on p
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:40:59PM -, hessi...@hessiess.com wrote:
> Literally non resizeable, the window cannot be resized.
hm, I can open SDL windows that are resizable easily enough,
with... "SDL_RESIZABLE"
Mate
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:09:33PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> > Conclusion: 0.7 seconds is somewhat noticeable lag. It's another
> > question whether it's worth the effort to write the C program, but
> > hey, it's been done already.
>
> Well, I (and others possibly) have no concern about cache
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Elmo Todurov wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 01:32 PM, pancake wrote:
> >i would probably even improve the heap usage of this .c, but it's
> >better solution than the shellscript one IMHO.
>
> How?
I believe usability is a factor as important as general sucklessne
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:18:35PM +0200, c...@wzff.de wrote:
> Do these layouts provide any benefits? I found them rather useless actually,
> even in dwm... What do you use them for, and in what way do you use them if
> you don't mind sharing your experience?
I just tried the fibonacci (dwindle)
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> Using the vim splits may be cheating, but it sure is convenient.
sorry for self-reply: I thought that maybe for maximum punishment, the
fibonacci layout could support nmaster. (Also note that this is a
2560x1600 setup, that's why
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:03:27AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> My point was that that is false.
not only is it false, but a few months ago we were running an
application (with nsz) where on one computer about 10 processes mmapped
a 3.5GB file all at once, perfectly happily. (They were 64 bit
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 07:12:54PM +0400, anonymous wrote:
> Lynx and Mozilla Firefox support Gopher.
firefox's gopher support has some catches (e.g. only port 70 is
supported, given port after : is ignored).
There is an extension for firefox called overbite:
http://gopher.floodgap.com/overbite/
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:28:28PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Vi is a modal clusterfuck. I mean, the crazy shit that thing does?
> It's different on every machine. Even Bill Joy doesn't use vi anymore.
vi[m] is awesome (also most popular programmer's editor)
if you dismiss vi (and especial
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:29:36AM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote:
> > English really isn't much more than bastardized Germanic [...]. A bit like
> > C++ to C,
> > really.
> You made my day.
then i suggest reading this article:
http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/awfgrmlg.html
Mate
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:59:25AM +0200, pancake wrote:
> http://en.tokipona.org/
well this looks really interesting, no joke
thanks for the link
Mate
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:10:27AM -0700, Robert Ransom wrote:
> Scheme *should* be used for everything because at least one good macro
> system has been designed for it. Lisp macros can do arbitrary
> computation at compile-time, and the Scheme macro system required by
> R6RS provides all the pow
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:22:52PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:10:27AM -0700, Robert Ransom wrote:
> > Scheme *should* be used for everything because at least one good macro
> > system has been designed for it. Lisp macros can do arbitrary
> > comput
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:46:16AM -0700, Robert Ransom wrote:
> It was (at least in that paragraph). See my reply to your other message
> for three examples of useful SYNTAX-RULES macros; SYNTAX-RULES cannot
> be implemented properly without a hygienic macro system. I don't think
> you would act
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:46:09AM +0100, Aled Gest wrote:
> I've yet to see evidence of that in Scheme's case. If you can provide
> links to practical examples, of tools that are cleanly and efficiently
> written in Scheme, that aren't purely academic in purpose, and don't
> come with 30 pages of
Hello all,
here I am advertising my own personal project. (Technically it's a
complete rewrite, the old version was announced here once before.)
Home page: http://repo.hu/projects/plumb/
Plumb is a program that runs multiple processes and lets you define
arbitrary pipes between them (it uses lib
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:25:56PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/plumb
well darn, should've expected it from plan9 :)
yeah, i'll consider the name change, it's no problem at this point -
any suggestions for names? :)
Mate
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 05:40:43PM -0400, David J Patrick wrote:
> how about "piper" ?
why not "piper maru" at that
srsly, nice names so far, how about comments on the ware :D
Mate
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Hi,
> your »plumb« looks like the Plan 9 plumber[0] done wrong,
> whereas your »plumbnet« is a wrong done socat[1] or
> ncat[2]. Those tools do network right and allow further
> configuration, like encryption, wrappers, filters, e
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:39:24PM -0700, Robert Ransom wrote:
> This list is a subculture itself (as is the 9fans list).
wait what? i thought this list *was* the 9fetish^wfans list
M.
Hello all,
I guess I can't get enough of the punishment I always get in these
threads. Announcing project:
http://repo.hu/projects/cchan/
'This is a small library that implements a "channel" construct for
inter-thread communication in C programs. '
This is a very small and simple lib that does
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:42:43AM -0400, Corey Thomasson wrote:
> I was only referring to the channels, not the entire library. I
> pointed it out more as a potential jumpstart for implementing a
> select(), etc. I wasn't trying to say cchan was redundant.
libtask is a good pointer and looks nice
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:50:01PM +0200, timow+...@diningphilosopher.de wrote:
> On 2011-05-10, CHABOT Simon wrote:
> > Could you give me some suckless softwares name to work with UML ?
honestly i'm surprised by this lack of reaction to "UML" + "suckless" in
the same sentence. Usually this mailin
Hi,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:15:43AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> I think it's about time we started a minimalist, statically linked set
> of core utilities. The BSD family are bloated, and the GNU monstrous.
> Some of us seem to be resorting to using those from Plan 9, which were
> designed
> Honestly, I dislike 'modal text editors' as I feel they make the task at
> hand more difficult that it was to begin with. Sure there's a lot to be
> said for the power they bring, but with some forethought and planning
> I think that most of the power and all of the 'usefulness' of a modal
> edit
> I'd be surprised if you couldn't read epub books in 40 years. It's
> hard to
> kill an open text-based format.
I'd be surprised if you could read epub books in 40 years
(without electricity)
((or food))
regards,
Mate
> I like to change my background to a random color every 2-10ms; it's
http://dagobah.net/flash/epilepsy-with-nice-music.swf
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:40:48PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> On 06-08 12:13, Bert Münnich wrote:
> >>i dont think this is a task for an image viewer. we should
> >>probably write an ssetroot or so linking against imlib2 and
> >>allowing opaque colors like xsetroot does..
I think developing another X
hi,
> Whether or not your keyboard has a page up/down key is a bit moot;
> the point is that an editor should have under 10 keybindings: up,
> down, left, right (C-hjkl), page up and down (C-uv), save and quite
> (and search and search-and-replace (if you are feeling luxurious)).
you are wrong and
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:49:12AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Nick wrote:
> > I haven't used it,
> > so don't know it's level of suckiness, but might cairo work?
>
>
> No.
maybe check out animator: http://repo.hu/projects/animator/
disclaimers:
- i'm the aut
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:55:37PM -0400, Bryan Bennett wrote:
> Let's face it - the web is no longer focused on Gopher-like information
> presentation and gathering any longer. Live with it.
The Chrome browser source code is 155MB without libraries.
Its you and similar people who made the web to
hi,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:28:54AM +0300, Ruben Mikkonen wrote:
> > I don't know about all you, but I find dwm's sloppy focus can be
> > really annoying at times -- focusing a window when I accidentally
> > nudge my atrophying pointer -- and would rather click-to-focus. The
> > great thing abou
74 matches
Mail list logo
