On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
> I'm interested in math and CASs, but my opinions on available software
> are ill-formed and mostly ignorant. Does anyone else here have an
> interest in this topic, broadly speaking? If so, do you have any
> preferences for one package
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:11:50AM -0800, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Yannic Haupenthal
> > you might use
> >
> > /Firefox.*/ -> sel # and/or
> > /Shiretoko.*/ -> sel
> >
> > in your tagrules.
>
> Awesome! This is the best solution. :-)
> Please disregar
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:11:50AM -0800, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Yannic Haupenthal
> > you might use
> >
> > /Firefox.*/ -> sel # and/or
> > /Shiretoko.*/ -> sel
> >
> > in your tagrules.
>
> Awesome! This is the best solution. :-)
> Please disregar
A little off topic maybe, hope I'll be forgiven ...
I'm reading Rob Pike's C programming style guide
(http://www.quut.com/c/pikestyle.html), and the last rule says:
--
Simple rule: include files should never include include file
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:09:28AM +0100, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 10:25 PM, Uriel wrote:
> > If you define your personal identity based on the colors of your
> > fucking window manager I feel sorry for your pathetic worthless life.
>
> This is not the first time that you confuse caus
On 6/29/2010 7:42 AM, Nick wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:34:52PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
I'm looking for a minimally sane way to generate presentation slides,
ideally using something similar to markdown and capable of generating
decent-looking html (and hopefully) pdf.
S5 looks quite decent.
Hi:
I switched my main computer to Windows XP a while ago to play some
games, and was frustrated with the lack of simple usable IRC clients
(among other applications). So I decided to write my own. Since I didn't
want to mess with Visual Studio and complicated GUI toolkits, I decided
to write
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
wrote:
>
> On 12 Jul 2010, at 13:50, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12 Jul 2010, at 03:33, Joseph Xu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> I switched my main computer to Windows XP a while ago to
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis
wrote:
>
> On 13 Jul 2010, at 14:09, Joseph Xu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ethan:
>>
>> Thanks for checking out the software. Sounds like Tk is not as
>> cross-platform as it claims. I don't have access to a mac
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Uriel wrote:
> The ircfs site t is up now:
>
> http://www.ueber.net/code/r/ircfs
>
> ircfs is great, and its gui is great too, and mjl is a great hacker.
Thanks for linking this.
>
> And does the world really need yet another python irc client? And I'm
> not sure
Under what circumstance would you not be able to run sam's gui and have
to resort to a curses interface? sam already provides a way to connect
the gui to a remote host via ssh to edit files over a slow connection.
I've even done this with an old Windows port of sam running locally and
a remote
On 8/2/2010 6:15 PM, Wolf Tivy wrote:
I noticed there is a project for a samterm on the project ideas page.
Has anyone started on this? It seems like a really good idea.
I guess ideally it would be usable without X (in text mode) but would
still keep the nice view and selection interface.
Luxuri
x27;s my view on why a curses samterm is a good idea.
If noone is interested, I will survive with nano, but if people are
Why don't you just use vim? It meets all your requirements and like sam
has ed-style commands.
interested or if someone has started, I'm willing to throw some
time at it.
On 8/3/2010 11:14 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
Hey,
On 3 August 2010 09:50, Joseph Xu wrote:
Very few people use sam to begin with, even fewer would like the curses
interface. I'm guessing no more than 20 people.
The best reason not to write a program ever: nobody is using it yet.
I
Hi everyone,
I was playing around with awk and ran into some surprising data for the
function match(s, r), which returns the position of the first match of
regular expression r in string s. Here's the test I ran:
$ yes | head -1 | tr -d '\n' >/tmp/big
$ yes | head -100 | tr -d '\n' >/
On 08/11/2010 07:10 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:01:27AM -0700, Robert Ransom wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:41:30 -0400
>> Kris Maglione wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 06:14:55AM -0400, Joseph Xu wrote:
>>>> Hi everyon
On 8/22/2010 12:47 PM, David J Patrick wrote:
On 10-08-22 12:37 PM, Alexander Teinum wrote:
What doesn’t work well for me, is that I cannot easily extend
Markdown. The design that I propose is simpler and more strict. All
tags work the same way. The input is close to a data structure, and it
doe
Josh and I were discussing this over IRC. Here's an alternative patch I
came up with. It relies on the shell that executes st to parse the
arguments, so you can't run a command like st -e "touch arst", you have
to run st -e touch arst. This also means you can't have any st arguments
after the -e be
On 11/28/2010 06:22 AM, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Joseph Xu wrote:
>> came up with. It relies on the shell that executes st to parse the
>> arguments, so you can't run a command like st -e "touch arst", you have
>> to run s
Are there any instructions on how to use this libc with gcc?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:14 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> We don't compile stuff anymore since we have discovered the rc shell :D
>
> On 10/27/10, finkler wrote:
>> On 10/28/10 01:16, Jacob Todd wrote:
>>> If someone was go
Here's a little data just to ground things a bit:
$ time dash -c ''
real0m0.001s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
$ time rc -c ''
real0m0.002s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
$ time bash -c ''
real0m0.007s
user0m0.003s
sys 0m0.000s
$ time python -c ''
real0m0.028s
On 1/23/11, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 22 January 2011 20:41, Joseph Xu wrote:
>> Here's a little data just to ground things a bit:
>>
>> $ time dash -c ''
>>
>> real0m0.001s
>> user0m0.000s
>> sys 0m0.000s
>>
&g
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Sorry to revive this older discussion but I finally found that one
> graphical
> shell implemented in Webkit that your idea reminded me of. I thought you
> might be interested in reading about it (if you haven't already).
>
>
> http://acko.net
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Max DeLiso wrote:
> A) That's stupid
> B) Therefore OP must be stupid.
I don't think you're stupid, because the few times I've had to use
cmd.exe, I've thought about this myself. But I do think it's a waste of
time. How much do you use the console in Windows? Ver
> Is this a matter of efficiency alone?
The C implementation is straightforward and short. It doesn't get
simpler if you wrote it in a higher level language. Your shell script
is IMO much harder to understand.
25 matches
Mail list logo
