On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:17:53PM +0100, sin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 09:07:10PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > I can see the need for a '-d' flag for compatibility reasons but my
> > preference would be to just ignore the flag if it is specified. What are
> > peoples opinion on the '-d' f
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I can see the need for a '-d' flag for compatibility reasons but my
> preference would be to just ignore the flag if it is specified. What are
> peoples opinion on the '-d' flag?
>
> In any case, the tr.1 man page should be updated and the TOD
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:08:29AM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > I can see the need for a '-d' flag for compatibility reasons but my
> > preference would be to just ignore the flag if it is specified. What are
> > peoples opinion on the '-d'
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:17:53PM +0100, sin wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 09:07:10PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>> > I can see the need for a '-d' flag for compatibility reasons but my
>> > preference would be to just ignore the flag if
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:55:08PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
> There is wrong information about the installation directory and about
> how to run quark in the README.
Applied, thanks.
Dear suckless developers,
The manpage of XGetTextProperty mentions:
> An extra byte containing null (which is not included in the nitems
> member) is stored at the end of the value field of text_prop_return.
Which, if I understand correctly, means that the value field of the
property is dynamica
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:06:17PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:17:53PM +0100, sin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 09:07:10PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> >> > I can see the need for a '-d' flag for compatib
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>
>> I'll also probably rewrite the mmap code to use malloc since it causes
>> issues on some machines.
>
> The reason we used mmap was that it allocates memory only on use. So
> even if we mmap space for 1'114'112 ints (one for each unicode poi
Did anyone implemented links hinting without java script?
s.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 07:19:45PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> >
> >> I'll also probably rewrite the mmap code to use malloc since it causes
> >> issues on some machines.
> >
> > The reason we used mmap was that it allocates memory only on
Swiatoslaw Gal writes:
> Did anyone implemented links hinting without java script?
Why would you want that? It would be hundreds of lines of tremendously
ugly C-code for navigating the DOM, creating CSS, installing key
handlers...
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
> > Did anyone implemented links hinting without java script?
>
> Why would you want that? It would be hundreds of lines of tremendously
> ugly C-code for navigating the DOM, creating CSS, installing key
> handlers...
The reason I switched javascript on default is… quite embarrassing.
I use comp
Swiatoslaw Gal writes:
>> > Did anyone implemented links hinting without java script?
>>
>> Why would you want that? It would be hundreds of lines of tremendously
>> ugly C-code for navigating the DOM, creating CSS, installing key
>> handlers...
>
> The reason I switched javascript on default i
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:02:05PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> True. I would suggest just adding checks and bailing out when the return
> code is <0. Maybe something like the following?
Looks good. Can you resend with an attachment?
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 08:42:22PM +0100, sin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:02:05PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > True. I would suggest just adding checks and bailing out when the return
> > code is <0. Maybe something like the following?
>
> Looks good. Can you resend with an attachment?
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:20:14PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 08:42:22PM +0100, sin wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:02:05PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > > True. I would suggest just adding checks and bailing out when the return
> > > code is <0. Maybe something lik
16 matches
Mail list logo