On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:20:14PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 08:42:22PM +0100, sin wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 09:02:05PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote: > > > True. I would suggest just adding checks and bailing out when the return > > > code is <0. Maybe something like the following? > > > > Looks good. Can you resend with an attachment? > > Can do!
Applied, thanks.
