> True, but that doesn't mean certain elements of HTML5 aren't an
> improvement. I personally love , , , ,
> , and , since if they are used it means I can reliably
> strip out only the useful parts of a page and leave the mess that is
> the graphic designers' web behind. Go progress!
I would appro
On 12/18/11, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would approve if the existence of HTML5 meant anyone using the older
> HTML4 features got killed.
Most of the novelties of HTML5 are complementary to the elements of
HTML 2 and 4. HTML3 Plus was documentation of a bunch of bells and
whistles impl
> After you've shot all writers of HTML 4, lawyers, politicians,
> programmers and designers? And expect people to listen to and support
> your political theories?
They will when I build giant killing machines in HTML5, but I fear the
migration of my SOAP to IPV6 and DNSSEC might cause random head
