> True, but that doesn't mean certain elements of HTML5 aren't an > improvement. I personally love <article>, <header>, <nav>, <section>, > <audio>, and <video>, since if they are used it means I can reliably > strip out only the useful parts of a page and leave the mess that is > the graphic designers' web behind. Go progress!
I would approve if the existence of HTML5 meant anyone using the older HTML4 features got killed. Next I would demand communism. HTML5 is just yet an other standard. You guys are too positive I guess...
