On 12/18/11, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I would approve if the existence of HTML5 meant anyone using the older > HTML4 features got killed. Most of the novelties of HTML5 are complementary to the elements of HTML 2 and 4. HTML3 Plus was documentation of a bunch of bells and whistles implemented by commercial web browsers of which every copy should be burned, twice.
Sadly, the scripting interface defined by HTML5 is defined pretty much the same way as the elements of HTML3 Plus were, but executable code in documents is bound to suck anyway. > Next I would demand communism. > After you've shot all writers of HTML 4, lawyers, politicians, programmers and designers? And expect people to listen to and support your political theories?
