> I once envisioned a Plugin to directly go to "Print Views" of websites,
> since they tend to have considerably less suck on them.
I used to do the same thing, also I processed these pages with a few
scripts and htmlfmt. But then these clever web site operators stopped
serving specially cleansed
cting an other CSS layout. So we are pretty
much left alone with a huge pile of junk in every html file today.
Also -- HTML embedded base64 encoded images every two or three lines
(for the 30 twitter symbols).
Fuck HTML5
Yeah, lets all learn how to use all the X protocols.
* hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> [2011-11-02 10:11]:
> > I once envisioned a Plugin to directly go to "Print Views" of websites,
> > since they tend to have considerably less suck on them.
>
> I used to do the same thing, also I processed these pages with a few
> scripts and htmlfmt.
Do you mean, y
No. I try to use hget+sed+htmlfmt for Offline reading and synchronising,
but like you said images are no fun in text only formats. So ive also
played around with cleaned html in rss and mails, but stuff just doesnt
feel right.
Searching for solutions...
Am 02.11.2011 10:45 schrieb :
> * hiro <23h.
I believe every master-slave layout, i.e., layouts where mfact/nmaster
make sense, should own its own mfact/nmaster value, not to be disturbed
by other layouts. As said before, `col' and `tile' for example just
can't share the same mfact and still both look good.
Consequently, I decided to update
Left (back) arrow works in dmenu well. Right (forward) does not do anything.
Is it a bug or feature?
Cordially,
s.
On 11/02/11 at 01:52pm, Swiatoslaw Gal wrote:
> Left (back) arrow works in dmenu well. Right (forward) does not do anything.
> Is it a bug or feature?
>
It works here.
Manolo
--
> * hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> [2011-11-02 10:11]:
> > > I once envisioned a Plugin to directly go to "Print Views" of
> > > websites,
> > > since they tend to have considerably less suck on them.
> >
I used to use mobile version of some websites, but as handheld
computer bloat up, so do websites
* Bjartur Thorlacius [2011-11-02 16:00]:
* hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> [2011-11-02 10:11]:
> > I once envisioned a Plugin to directly go to "Print Views" of
> > websites,
> > since they tend to have considerably less suck on them.
>
I used to use mobile version of some websites, but as handhel
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> Another core concept that plays into this is "progressive enhancement",
> which states that the basic content can be downloaded and displayed in a
> simple yet readable manner by only presenting the content itself (w/o
> images, CSS, or J
* Kurt H Maier [2011-11-02 16:40]:
web idiots have been spouting such bullshit since the 'graceful
degradation' days of html4. it's never come true, and it never will,
because the "standards" put forth are anything but. what you are
talking about is the web version of "the check is in the mail
* hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> [2011-11-02 13:21]:
> No. I try to use hget+sed+htmlfmt for Offline reading and synchronising,
> [..]
> Searching for solutions...
best compromise I found was w3m which has a decent way to spawn external
"browsers", which I misuse for flash or other evil stuff which
* Bjartur Thorlacius [2011-11-02 15:55]:
> I used to use mobile version of some websites, but as handheld
> computer bloat up, so do websites.
Sadly yes. Another problem there is that they try to be smarter than the
client by offering some buttons to hide and show content, rather than
just showi
* Andreas Krennmair [2011-11-02 16:59]:
> * Kurt H Maier [2011-11-02 16:40]:
> And progressive enhancement has already become true. Much
> of the whole HTML5 hype is BS, but it has been shown that it isn't
> too difficult to develop web applications that are functional on a
> vast range of client
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:14 PM, wrote:
> developing sane web applications is possible for ages. If you put "from
> lynx to full-blown browsers" into the definition of sane (which is
> itself the only sane way) everithing is clear. Most folks don't seem to
> think like that and trade usability and
Somebody claiming to be Kurt H Maier wrote:
web idiots have been spouting such bullshit since the 'graceful
degradation' days of html4. it's never come true, and it never will,
because the "standards" put forth are anything but. what you are
talking about is the web version of "the check is in
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:14:39 -, Andreas Krennmair
wrote:
On the contrary, HTML5 goes the way of bringing markup to a more
abstract, semantic way (with a plethora of new tags such as ,
and many more), and for this semantic markup the layout is
defined purely via CSS.
Or the user agen
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:05:17 -, wrote:
Print versions, where they exist, are the sanest solution in my
experience. Wikipedia is a nice example. I have a bookmark, which sends
me directly there. Not perfect though, because links point to
non-printable versions of the article. Shame.
In that
Hello and thanks for the wonder that is dwm.
Below is a patch for issues I have found with 2 monitors where one
monitor is below another.
The issue can be found when moving a floating window that fills the
entire available area from one monitor to another. (This is with a
borderpx of 0)
thanks,
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> Or the user agent (aka your browser). Furthermore, this will allow you to
> customize layout by configuring your user agent. Read: layouts that suck
> less. HTML tables are completely uncustomizable.
No it won't, because people will cont
Hello,
For those who were weary of my Ruby wmiirc[1]'s power consumption,
I am happy to announce that the latest Ruby 1.9.3-p0 stable release
has solved Ruby's problem of causing excessive CPU wakeups-from-idle
which would drain your laptop battery much sooner than you'd expect.
On my ASUS UL30A-
Anselm,
Any word on a timetable for disowning wmii? This is a four-hundred
line configuration that requires a 1600-line library, not to mention
an entire extra programming language.
To manage x11 windows.
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For those who were weary of my Ruby wmiirc[1]'s power consumption,
> I am happy to announce that the latest Ruby 1.9.3-p0 stable release
> has solved Ruby's problem of causing excessive CPU wakeups-from-idle
Indeed it has. I ha
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> Anselm,
>
> Any word on a timetable for disowning wmii? This is a four-hundred
> line configuration that requires a 1600-line library, not to mention
> an entire extra programming language.
>
> To manage x11 windows.
>
>
what does that even m
25 matches
Mail list logo
