It's reliable if you want only the audio and not the video ;)
* hiro <23h...@gmail.com> [2014-06-03 21:05:23 +0200]:
> choose a stream, meaning of itags is on wikipedia article of youtube.
> wget -q -O - 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux1Za8Wmz_s'|sed
> 's/"/\n/g; s/\\u0026/ /g; s/,/\n/g'|sed -n
> '/url_encoded_fmt_stream_map/,/^$/p; /adaptive_fmts/,/^$/p'
>
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:05:23PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> choose a stream, meaning of itags is on wikipedia article of youtube.
> wget -q -O - 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux1Za8Wmz_s'|sed
> 's/"/\n/g; s/\\u0026/ /g; s/,/\n/g'|sed -n
> '/url_encoded_fmt_stream_map/,/^$/p; /adaptive_fmts/,/^$/p'
>
but beware: they lowered audio quality in general recently. whereas I
used to get 192kbit vorbis in the past now I can only get 128kbit,
both in the normal 720p/1080p video and the pure audio versions.
it might be that the itag 141 and 172 are not available, even though
the example I posted seems t
yes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Quality_and_codecs
itag bitrate
139[3] MP4 AAC 48
140 MP4 AAC 128
141[3] MP4 AAC 256
171 WebMVorbis 128
172[3] WebMVorbis 192
Quoth hiro:
> One very nice new thing i discovered by going the manual way without
> the stupid quvi (which sadly randomly stopped working at some point
> for me) was that they now at least they have pure audio files
> together with that adaptive streaming bullshit, so I don't need ffmpeg
> for my
choose a stream, meaning of itags is on wikipedia article of youtube.
wget -q -O - 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux1Za8Wmz_s'|sed
's/"/\n/g; s/\\u0026/ /g; s/,/\n/g'|sed -n
'/url_encoded_fmt_stream_map/,/^$/p; /adaptive_fmts/,/^$/p'
One very nice new thing i discovered by going the manual way wi
> - not use GNOME
As a matter of fact, I don't have gnome. But, having "any high
level script" bindings in order to customize the gnome desktop is
ok... till it's not mandatory for a reasonnably featured
desktop. If I'm not wrong, gnome desktop APIs are based on
gobject which can be interacted wi
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> You missed the points.
>
> I don't want "standard" distro integration to be a massive work.
> Now it's near unreasonable to integrate a proper desktop distro
> alone, and it's quite worse from a "SDK" point of view. It's good
> for the bus
> Yes; you could go change it to embed Lua.
Sure. And all the used external lua modules too.
Should have been a C toolbox, not lua scripts...
What a pain!
--
Sylvain
You missed the points.
I don't want "standard" distro integration to be a massive work.
Now it's near unreasonable to integrate a proper desktop distro
alone, and it's quite worse from a "SDK" point of view. It's good
for the business of distro integration: coze a small team, or a
sole coder canno
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 04:14:21PM +0200, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
> You're speaking like you're using some OS in which, during runtime,
> the code of that software written with a scripting language
> is passed through a dispatcher that recalls namespace sessions
> and, then, to a limited number of
You're speaking like you're using some OS in which, during runtime,
the code of that software written with a scripting language
is passed through a dispatcher that recalls namespace sessions
and, then, to a limited number of scripting interpreters loaded
and daemonised in memory when available for
patrick295767 patrick295767 writes:
> Actually, this page http://suckless.org/rocks could be better.
> Many useful lightweight applications are not listed.
If you think something is missing, then present a commit(s) to the
submission queue, with your rationale in the commit message.
pgpcIJUaeQM1
- "Unless I’m mistaken, suckless in general advocates for
statically-linked standard C libraries of reasonable size.
http://suckless.org/rocks";
Actually, this page http://suckless.org/rocks could be better.
Many useful lightweight applications are not listed.
This very old, SC, is not listed.
The
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> Why would you do this? It's bloody idiotic, if you think about it. It
> would be like having all C programs ship their own libc. Have you seen
> how big perl is? Do you really want to have two perl installations just
> because two different
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 04:08:59PM +0200, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
> installed lua (with additional modules).
>
> I don't want this high level script language as a system
> dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
> l
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
> installed lua (with additional modules).
>
> I don't want this high level script language as a system
> dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
> libquvi. [R
On Thu, 15 May 2014 16:08:59 +0200
Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
> installed lua (with additional modules).
> I don't want this high level script language as a system
> dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
> libquvi. Coze I wo
Hi,
Unfortunately, libquvi on gentoo expects a system
installed lua (with additional modules).
I don't want this high level script language as a system
dependency. I would prefer lua being packaged internally into
libquvi. Coze I would like to quit gentoo one day and have my own
suckless-ish dist
many many many thanks. Awesome post !!
2014-05-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Dmitrij D. Czarkoff :
> patrick295767 patrick295767 said:
>> One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
>> any win32 apps as well.
>
> quvi dump -b mute -e "ffplay %u" $URL
>
> --
> Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
>
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> quvi dump -b mute -e "ffplay %u" $URL
Heyho,
since mpv uses quvi internally you could also just use:
mpv $URL
--Markus
patrick295767 patrick295767 said:
> One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
> any win32 apps as well.
quvi dump -b mute -e "ffplay %u" $URL
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:57:56PM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
> any win32 apps as well.
Your drugs suck.
One can retrieve the link and send it over mplayer on nix, vlc,... and
any win32 apps as well.
2014-05-07 19:33 GMT+02:00 Ryan O’Hara :
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM, patrick295767 patrick295767
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was watching a movie on youtube, and finally I realized that we
>> still h
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM, patrick295767 patrick295767
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was watching a movie on youtube, and finally I realized that we
> still haven't coded an application, such as we were doing 10-20 years
> ago.
>
> Why we still so heavily use the browser, when so much is possible with
26 matches
Mail list logo
