Let's just delete the thread from our inboxes and move on then. >_>
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Ryan R wrote:
> squabble squabble squabble
>
> On 6/14/09, Thomas Gallen wrote:
> > The issue of incompatibility between the two groups has been brought
> > up in previous threads about
squabble squabble squabble
On 6/14/09, Thomas Gallen wrote:
> The issue of incompatibility between the two groups has been brought
> up in previous threads about this same topic (and I agree).
> Unfortunately, if nobody was listening before, then most likely nobody
> is listening now.
>
> Thomas
The issue of incompatibility between the two groups has been brought
up in previous threads about this same topic (and I agree).
Unfortunately, if nobody was listening before, then most likely nobody
is listening now.
Thomas
On Jun 14, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Niklas Koponen wrote:
> I don't enjoy following the list anymore. Previously when I noticed new
> messages in the dwm list I got excited, now I just get annoyed.
>
> I will probably unsubscribe to this list.
>
> I just hope dwm won't start sucking as much as this ma
Enno Boland (Gottox) dixit (2009-06-12, 21:54):
> > Ditto for #suckless on oftc. Just makes me wonder what went wrong in the
> > merger.
> Admit, you were arguing with uriel :)
No, recently I was definitely agreeing with uriel. :) You're mistaking
me for someone else.
--
[a]
> Ditto for #suckless on oftc. Just makes me wonder what went wrong in the
> merger.
Admit, you were arguing with uriel :)
--
http://gnuffy.chaotika.org - Real Community Distro
Niklas Koponen dixit (2009-06-12, 22:21):
> When the mailing lists got merged, somehow d...@suckless.org started to suck.
> There is a lot of noise and it seems that the people that used to actively
> post to d...@suckless.org are not posting there anymore. At least that is my
> opinion, I don't h
Hi!
I enjoyed following the d...@suckless.org list. I'm not a C programmer but I
enjoyed reading the fine comments people made about dwm code and patches to
it. I also got a lot of hints about different kind of useful suckless
software.
It was easy to decide if I wanted to read or not the mails b
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:10:44PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> I have a totally different POV on this whole matter.
> Imho all the threads about these issues are very entertaining reading
> material, so I hope the lists stay as they are :)
If you mean that you only want one list (dev@) then yo
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:39:37 +0200
"Claudio M. Alessi" wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:46:20PM +0800, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> > Why can't people filter out messages with [OT] is the subject line?
> Why can't people just stay on-topic?
>
> To me, people should avoid OT posts, should use filte
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:46:20PM +0800, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> Why can't people filter out messages with [OT] is the subject line?
Why can't people just stay on-topic?
To me, people should avoid OT posts, should use filters (since the list
configuration can't satisfy all users, while personal f
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> On (12/06/09 12:15), Daniel Bainton wrote:
>> To: dev mail list
>> From: Daniel Bainton
>> Subject: Re: [dev] last request for a dev-only list
>> Reply-To: dev mail list
>> List-Id: dev mail list
>&g
On (12/06/09 12:15), Daniel Bainton wrote:
> To: dev mail list
> From: Daniel Bainton
> Subject: Re: [dev] last request for a dev-only list
> Reply-To: dev mail list
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> But people are idiots, they don't know how to format the subject
If you are in the list, then you are supposed to know how to filter.
2009/6/12 Daniel Bainton :
> But people are idiots, they don't know how to format the subject clearly.
>
> 2009/6/12 Aurélien APTEL :
>> I agree. Just don't read the thread you don't find interesting. The
>> subject should be c
But people are idiots, they don't know how to format the subject clearly.
2009/6/12 Aurélien APTEL :
> I agree. Just don't read the thread you don't find interesting. The
> subject should be clear about that.
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
>> I try to answer extra
I agree. Just don't read the thread you don't find interesting. The
subject should be clear about that.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote:
> I try to answer extra-uriel-like-friendly.
>
> Why can't people stfu and do some work or try to learn how to filter
> mails instead
I try to answer extra-uriel-like-friendly.
Why can't people stfu and do some work or try to learn how to filter
mails instead of argueing about such needless crap.
The old lists were mostly off-topic too. And especially the dwm-list
was used to announce other suckless(-like) projects very often.
Why can't people filter out messages with [OT] is the subject line?
--
Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin - staticfree.info/~samuel
Maybe a bbs would be better. With plenty of sections! !!;)))
On Jun 11, 2009 8:19 PM, "Jeremy Jay" wrote:
Again, I know how easy it is to set up filters, and I've done it before,
but unsubscribing is an even more simple solution.
I think dev@ is pretty self-explanatory, it should be for bug re
Again, I know how easy it is to set up filters, and I've done it before,
but unsubscribing is an even more simple solution.
I think dev@ is pretty self-explanatory, it should be for bug reports,
patches, and other _DEV_elopment-related topics. Most people interested in
one of these are interested
There's always the archives. Unfortunately, because of the size of
peoples rants these days the off topic discussion is beginning to far
outweigh actual project related chatter.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0400, Jeremy Jay wrote:
> As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I
The set of emails that every member of a list wants to read is
different, the only solution to make everyone happy would be to have
one list per-email (or perhaps one list per-thread, if you are really
optimistic and tolerant).
As an alternative one can setup filters or use the Delete button (or
d
I'd suggest taking a look at hackers@ and wiki@, which will at least
keep you abreast of code changes and any patches that get added to the
website.
--
Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin - staticfree.info/~samuel
As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I could really
do without all the off-topic conversations by the same 10 people. If
there will not be split suckless-dev/suckless-discussion lists I will be
unsubscribing. I hate to miss all the good code and patches, but I also
hate dealing
24 matches
Mail list logo
